Maintenance for the week of April 6:
• [COMPLETE] ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – April 9, 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC) - 6:00PM EDT (22:00 UTC)

Former Emperors - Question + Poll

Nihili
Nihili
✭✭✭
I'm curious about the choices ZOS has made concerning Emperors, but more specifically former* emperors.

The emperor skill line is obviously ridiculously overpowering - but that's its point and I'm not debating whether that should be buffed or nerved or anything. The player who destroyed his social life - umm I mean dedicated all that time to become emperor deserves some sort of reward so he doesn't feel like such a big loser - uhm I mean deserves some sort of reward for his hard work. My question though is whether once he is emperor and then becomes a former emperor, should the passives really drop out THAT much? He had something crazy like 100% Ultimate gain, and afterwards it's reduced to "5% less ultimate cost" I think it was? Come on the guy was an emperor give him some slack, make it something 25% ultimate gain. So here's a poll so I can get community feedback on this:
Edited by Nihili on August 10, 2014 9:01PM

Former Emperors - Question + Poll 102 votes

No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
74%
Maddjujupitdemon_ESOLauraShaggygamingindytims_ESOliquid_wolfSaint_JiubB14_ESOBraidasErock25IllumousAntirobwookiefriseurGrandspasfrosth.darkomenb16_ESOTehMagnusElendorAshTalRoleMaulkinKaghei 76 votes
No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperors, but they can have a little bit more than they have now (my opinion)
17%
ecitraffic_ESOVeshalCinnamon_SpiderAllPlayAndNoWorkAltaris16_ESOgurluasb16_ESOZabusBuckshunexPausekeyKillerhebeDontBeAfraidyorzoAnteCoyoteNihiliBlazzin-AceXalluscompunerd3 18 votes
Yes, former emperors need to have their passives buff to be closer to their previous state, but still not quite Emperor-level yet
6%
Amsel_McKaySqckijimaKirito144AsgariObusVanHalen 7 votes
Former Emperors and Emperors should be indistinguishable.
0%
Morostyle 1 vote
  • Enodoc
    Enodoc
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    With Emperor Farming being what it is (was? how has it gone since the new campaigns started?), many people are of the opinion that former emperor buffs should be removed altogether, as the title has become meaningless due to the number of people farming it off each other.
    UESP: The Unofficial Elder Scrolls Pages - A collaborative source for all knowledge on the Elder Scrolls series since 1995
    Join us on Discord - discord.gg/uesp
  • Cody
    Cody
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    Former emperors should not get squat, harsh as it sounds. I would say the title could be a cool bragging right.... but it has been ruined by all the emperor farmers:(
  • Columba
    Columba
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    former emporers should get nothing....and like it. current emporers should get a minor buff only, not god mode.
  • Nox_Aeterna
    Nox_Aeterna
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    The emperor could be god mode to me , no problem , there should be only one at a time and that guy should be awesome.

    Now there is no limit on the amount of former emps , so it is ok to give them something to make them feel special , they did get emp , but they should not be much stronger than the normal player , i believe minor buffs are ok.
    "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
    -Hanlon's razor
  • SBR_QuorTek
    SBR_QuorTek
    ✭✭✭
    Get rid of any former emperor benefits, well other than maybe the title, though the playerbase has made obtaining the title worthless.
  • Braidas
    Braidas
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    these polls should have to pass some sort of screening ffs
  • kijima
    kijima
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, former emperors need to have their passives buff to be closer to their previous state, but still not quite Emperor-level yet
    The passives for former emp aren't OP, this poll seems a little silly be honest.

    You should be stating the former emps passives (for those that don't know what they are) and then asking two questions.

    1. Should Former Emperor's keep their current Passives
    2. Should Former Emperor's lose their current Passives
    Been here since Feb 2014 - You'd think I'd be half reasonable at this game by now...
  • pitdemon_ESO
    pitdemon_ESO
    ✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    1. Should Former Emperor's keep their current Passives
    2. Should Former Emperor's lose their current Passives
    3. Should Former Emperors lose their Passives and have the title replaced with Farmer Emperor

    :p
    The Grixxitt of Melek - Alfar Nightblade
    Grixx of the Reach - Crafter/Reachwitch/Sorceror


    Must...downvote...stupidity... (clicks sidebar furiously)
  • kijima
    kijima
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, former emperors need to have their passives buff to be closer to their previous state, but still not quite Emperor-level yet
    @pitdemon_ESO‌ your third option in poll makes the most sense. :D
    Been here since Feb 2014 - You'd think I'd be half reasonable at this game by now...
  • Orchish
    Orchish
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    Former Emperors should have a title and nothing more. That's my opinion.
  • Atreyu
    Atreyu
    ✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    If it were for me I would strip former emperors of even that little bit they still have. Especially considering those who pve'd their way to victory in empty campaigns.
    Edited by Atreyu on August 11, 2014 2:18AM
    Atreyu - VR14 - DK
  • ThisOnePosts
    ThisOnePosts
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    lmfao @ Farmer Emperor. How true it is. However, the passives don't need buffs while Werewolf is almost useless.
  • Mortuum
    Mortuum
    ✭✭✭✭
    Add 1 more option: Farmed Emperors can have a title only. Yes, its correct and not a typo: FARMED Emperor title...
  • Mud_Puppy
    Mud_Puppy
    ✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    Due to the fact most formers we see aren't legitimate and got there by some form of exploit, the entire AP system should be changed.

    Even without that issue, something like like a non static ranking shouldn't act static. After being deposed there should be no more boons recieved.
    /kill
  • Nihili
    Nihili
    ✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperors, but they can have a little bit more than they have now (my opinion)
    I'm going to offer a different perspective on what you guys are saying, but just to make it clear, this perspective isn't necessarily a view I hold, it is just one I am sharing with you guys

    I don't see that many former emperors, and you guys make "farming" it sound like the easiest thing ever. If that was the case why aren't all of you former emperors?
    The fact that some people can dedicate enough time to becoming an emperor, and "farm" it, shouldn't be enough justification for its nerfing. A LOT in this game is farming. I "farm" gold and xp on a regular basis - I suppose we should nerf that too, just because I can "unfairly farm" 100,000 gold? Nerf xp too, because I can reach VR in a couple days worth of gameplay. Just because someone gets something in a unconventional way, doesn't mean that method is wrong. But maybe in this case it is wrong. Which leads me to my next point.

    What is wrong about having Emperorship farmable? "Oh, you see it's because 1) emperors are incredibly overpowered which leads to 2) there shouldn't be many emperors/former emperors, otherwise it breaks the game".
    The interesting point about this argument is that it makes the emperorship skill-line unreachable, and if reached you possess it only temporarily. You're calling for the eradication of former emperors. In other words you're saying that once an emperor has been crowned by capturing 6 keeps, the moment he loses one of those keeps he can't keep his emperor skill-line. And how easy is it to lose one of those keeps? It can happen overnight. In short, you get to be emperor for an hour and after that you lose it mate, and "oh you want to keep some of your powers? nope nope, you see the community complained your a tad overpowered babe".

    Why bother getting emperorship if you'll lose it nearly the next day? Why have a skill line that can only be reached by the best players, and then lost almost immediately? Why does it feel like I'm the only person who thinks of this?
    This means that former emperors must have some of the emperorship powers, otherwise there would be no motivation for any of the players to work towards it.

    You guys who call for former emperors to be "stripped of everything but the title" really shouldn't become devs...You cry for blood too easily :neutral_face:
  • Syndy
    Syndy
    ✭✭✭
    NookyZooky wrote: »
    Former emperors should not get squat, harsh as it sounds. I would say the title could be a cool bragging right.... but it has been ruined by all the emperor farmers:(

    This... The option I wanted is not in the poll... They should get nothing, not even the small increases they get now from being a former emperor... A title, and a costume, that is it... Unless you are the current emperor, imo, you should get no buffs...

    With no "former emperor" buffs, it would stop the emperor farming.
    Syndy - VR14 Breton Templar
    Sacrilege
    Daggerfall Covenant

    Warhammer
    Syndia - 100 Zealot, Syndai - 99 Black Guard, Cyndrana - 84 Sorceress
  • Mortuum
    Mortuum
    ✭✭✭✭
    Nihili wrote: »
    I'm going to offer a different perspective on what you guys are saying, but just to make it clear, this perspective isn't necessarily a view I hold, it is just one I am sharing with you guys

    I don't see that many former emperors, and you guys make "farming" it sound like the easiest thing ever. If that was the case why aren't all of you former emperors?
    The fact that some people can dedicate enough time to becoming an emperor, and "farm" it, shouldn't be enough justification for its nerfing. A LOT in this game is farming. I "farm" gold and xp on a regular basis - I suppose we should nerf that too, just because I can "unfairly farm" 100,000 gold? Nerf xp too, because I can reach VR in a couple days worth of gameplay. Just because someone gets something in a unconventional way, doesn't mean that method is wrong. But maybe in this case it is wrong. Which leads me to my next point.

    What is wrong about having Emperorship farmable? "Oh, you see it's because 1) emperors are incredibly overpowered which leads to 2) there shouldn't be many emperors/former emperors, otherwise it breaks the game".
    The interesting point about this argument is that it makes the emperorship skill-line unreachable, and if reached you possess it only temporarily. You're calling for the eradication of former emperors. In other words you're saying that once an emperor has been crowned by capturing 6 keeps, the moment he loses one of those keeps he can't keep his emperor skill-line. And how easy is it to lose one of those keeps? It can happen overnight. In short, you get to be emperor for an hour and after that you lose it mate, and "oh you want to keep some of your powers? nope nope, you see the community complained your a tad overpowered babe".

    Why bother getting emperorship if you'll lose it nearly the next day? Why have a skill line that can only be reached by the best players, and then lost almost immediately? Why does it feel like I'm the only person who thinks of this?
    This means that former emperors must have some of the emperorship powers, otherwise there would be no motivation for any of the players to work towards it.

    You guys who call for former emperors to be "stripped of everything but the title" really shouldn't become devs...You cry for blood too easily :neutral_face:

    Why we are not? Because we dont want to be seen as exploiters, simple. I much more prefer my Captain title then ''Farmer Emperor''.Dedicate time mate? Please, small campaign, few friends, get title, resign, loose keep, next get it. Possible to do it several times without real effort, so dont say it require anything else then bunch of like-minded farmers.

    What is wrong with it being farmable? It supposed to be reward for very few, possible skilled players, spending their time in Cyro, real Alliance leaders. Cant really compare it to farming mats or gold, that was bit silly, no offense.

    Who said it cant be hold longer? Real, very few btw, Emperors in game will fight with teeth and nails to hold title, defending keeps, leading big groups, helping where help is needed. Seen it twice only...but doable for sure.

    To sum it up mate i will just say one thing: i have seen lvl 23 FORMER EMPEROR myself...And title is not account-wide. Is that enough to explain how broken this mechanic is in game now?? Lvl 23...Prolly member of Farmer guild or group, who took it for lols when all others were feed. This is how ''hard'' it is to get. This is what i disagree with what you said.

    If/when Zeni change system, and make farming impossible, so we will only have well earned and deserved Emperors and Formers, i will 100% agree that formers should be strong, maybe 30% Emperor strength. Until this happen: no damn way, FARMER title only.

  • Nihili
    Nihili
    ✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperors, but they can have a little bit more than they have now (my opinion)
    Mortuum wrote: »
    Nihili wrote: »
    I'm going to offer a different perspective on what you guys are saying, but just to make it clear, this perspective isn't necessarily a view I hold, it is just one I am sharing with you guys

    I don't see that many former emperors, and you guys make "farming" it sound like the easiest thing ever. If that was the case why aren't all of you former emperors?
    The fact that some people can dedicate enough time to becoming an emperor, and "farm" it, shouldn't be enough justification for its nerfing. A LOT in this game is farming. I "farm" gold and xp on a regular basis - I suppose we should nerf that too, just because I can "unfairly farm" 100,000 gold? Nerf xp too, because I can reach VR in a couple days worth of gameplay. Just because someone gets something in a unconventional way, doesn't mean that method is wrong. But maybe in this case it is wrong. Which leads me to my next point.

    What is wrong about having Emperorship farmable? "Oh, you see it's because 1) emperors are incredibly overpowered which leads to 2) there shouldn't be many emperors/former emperors, otherwise it breaks the game".
    The interesting point about this argument is that it makes the emperorship skill-line unreachable, and if reached you possess it only temporarily. You're calling for the eradication of former emperors. In other words you're saying that once an emperor has been crowned by capturing 6 keeps, the moment he loses one of those keeps he can't keep his emperor skill-line. And how easy is it to lose one of those keeps? It can happen overnight. In short, you get to be emperor for an hour and after that you lose it mate, and "oh you want to keep some of your powers? nope nope, you see the community complained your a tad overpowered babe".

    Why bother getting emperorship if you'll lose it nearly the next day? Why have a skill line that can only be reached by the best players, and then lost almost immediately? Why does it feel like I'm the only person who thinks of this?
    This means that former emperors must have some of the emperorship powers, otherwise there would be no motivation for any of the players to work towards it.

    You guys who call for former emperors to be "stripped of everything but the title" really shouldn't become devs...You cry for blood too easily :neutral_face:

    Why we are not? Because we dont want to be seen as exploiters, simple. I much more prefer my Captain title then ''Farmer Emperor''.Dedicate time mate? Please, small campaign, few friends, get title, resign, loose keep, next get it. Possible to do it several times without real effort, so dont say it require anything else then bunch of like-minded farmers.

    What is wrong with it being farmable? It supposed to be reward for very few, possible skilled players, spending their time in Cyro, real Alliance leaders. Cant really compare it to farming mats or gold, that was bit silly, no offense.

    Who said it cant be hold longer? Real, very few btw, Emperors in game will fight with teeth and nails to hold title, defending keeps, leading big groups, helping where help is needed. Seen it twice only...but doable for sure.

    To sum it up mate i will just say one thing: i have seen lvl 23 FORMER EMPEROR myself...And title is not account-wide. Is that enough to explain how broken this mechanic is in game now?? Lvl 23...Prolly member of Farmer guild or group, who took it for lols when all others were feed. This is how ''hard'' it is to get. This is what i disagree with what you said.

    If/when Zeni change system, and make farming impossible, so we will only have well earned and deserved Emperors and Formers, i will 100% agree that formers should be strong, maybe 30% Emperor strength. Until this happen: no damn way, FARMER title only.

    Some decent points and I'll take it on board. I'll admit I haven't seen a level 23 emperor but I'll take your word for it - I still feel like the points I raised are worth a thought or two, but I'll give way to yours at the moment.
  • Mortuum
    Mortuum
    ✭✭✭✭
    @Nihili In general, i do agree with you that something like Emperor/Former should be worth it, and give nice, perma boost to your character. My only point is:not in current state of the game, when everyone and their dog are Former Emperors.

    As said in the end of my post, when this issue will be fixed, and we will have, for example, 1 Emperor and 2-3 Former Emperors in each campaign, then even ex-Emperors will deserve decent boost which will make them important/wanted on the battlefield.

    Emperor can stay as it is now, very strong and hard to kill himself, while formers may/should get AOE buffs like +crit, +attack speed, regen aura, list of possibilities is endless really. Dont make them strong as character, but make them useful for Alliance.I actually think if this system will be in game from start, there will be way less farming, only real PVP players/team leaders will want it, to help their Alliance, not PVE players for speed trials/any PVE as it is now.

  • AshTal
    AshTal
    ✭✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    While I don't see hundreds of former emperors I know that the majority are already decked out in legendary gear and Vet 12 with all the PvP skills and probably spend more time in PvP than any other player. I can't see why they need any sort of bonus at all they are going to slaughter casual PvPers as it is.
  • Halrloprillalar
    Halrloprillalar
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    Is this a serious thread?
  • c0rp
    c0rp
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Where is the choice for "EMPEROR ABILITIES SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM GAME"?
    Force weapon swap to have priority over EVERYTHING. Close enough.
    Make stamina builds even with magicka builds.
    Disable abilities while holding block.
    Give us a REASON to do dungeons more than once.
    Remove PVP AoE CAP. It is ruining Cyrodiil.
    Fix/Remove Forward Camps. They are ruining Cyrodiil.
    Impenetrability needs to REDUCE CRIT DAMAGE. Not negate entire builds.
    Werewolf is not equal to Vamps/Bats.
  • SBR_QuorTek
    SBR_QuorTek
    ✭✭✭
    I still can't believe this thread was made to be honest, where is the... sure keep former emperor, but only as a title with no extra gain or benefit.
  • liquid_wolf
    liquid_wolf
    ✭✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    As a former emperor, I don't believe changes need to be made.
  • Durham
    Durham
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    EMP farming is why i voted the way i did... I would like to see the Emp. (Server Name) This would tell more of a story...
    PVP DEADWAIT
    PVP The Unguildables
  • Lionxoft
    Lionxoft
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's an idea. Remove former emperor buffs and you'll have objective gameplay instead of farm fiestas. PvP leads need to play their own game.
  • demonlkojipub19_ESO
    demonlkojipub19_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, former emperors should not have anything near the power they had while they were emperor.
    This counts as no more power than the guy next to him, who never got emperor.
  • McCracken79
    McCracken79
    ✭✭✭
    I don't think the Emperor buffs are the problem. When you mix them with a DragonKnight, Vampire or Templar then that is when it becomes ridiculous. It comes down to the class abilities + Emperor buffs. You also have to remember that with any good Emperor there are one or two good healers with them. Most people go straight for the Emp and forget about his healers. Take them down first and they will be more vulnerable.
  • Anomaly 2
    Anomaly 2
    ✭✭
    As a former emperor I really hope they don't buff or nerf the former emperor buffs.. They are so incredibly minor as they are which is they way they should stay. Its meant to be a small increase to say congratulations on your achievement. Increasing it more would feel OP. Leave them alone ZOS...
    Edited by Anomaly 2 on August 13, 2014 12:22AM
  • Perphection
    Perphection
    ✭✭✭✭
    Do you guys even know what the former Emp buffs are? Seriously...OP?
Sign In or Register to comment.