andre.roques.3b14_ESO wrote: »I think the biggest concern is the use of mega servers rather than smaller population servers that many MMOs used previously. The logic is that if you have 1/2 million people playing on a mega server, a single AH would be a bit of a nightmare.
audabon2013 wrote: »
je25ffb14_ESO wrote: »I'd be curious to hear from the community, and perhaps EOS, what the logic is behind having separate auction houses.
I suppose the answer will be that it will stop gold farmers but, in the end, the more supply, the less the cost. Secondly, gold selling and such should be the responsibility of EOS to weed out. The response of, 'it makes people interact' is proving to be the reverse, actually. Having 5 guilds makes it incredibly difficult to get to know anyone, ESPECIALLY, when you have to shop guilds to shop for items.
Please add a central auction house!
andre.roques.3b14_ESO wrote: »I think the biggest concern is the use of mega servers rather than smaller population servers that many MMOs used previously. The logic is that if you have 1/2 million people playing on a mega server, a single AH would be a bit of a nightmare.
audabon2013 wrote: »Still the same old arguments.
1. Doomsday lies about how a megaserver AH woul destroy the universe as we know it.
2. Immersion (aka social). trade spam isnt very social/immersive, sadly people like this fallback argument due to its subjective basis.
The only thing I could ever think of is that there aint that much in game that you actually need to buy.
MercyKilling wrote: »I just want an easily accessible place where I can go WITHOUT BEING A MEMBER OF ANY GUILDS and peruse/buy things other players have to sell.
If this turns out to be an auction house, so be it.
If Zenimax can keep it from becoming an auction house, kudos to them.
audabon2013 wrote: »Still the same old arguments.
1. Doomsday lies about how a meged daserver AH woul destroy the universe as we know it.
2. Immersion (aka social). trade spam isnt very social/immersive, sadly people like this fallback argument due to its subjective basis.
I could care less about either of our opinions on a global AH, as it's a done and done topic. What irks me is the fact you still don't understand the difference between an immersion argument and a social one. You could have used "2. Immersion/Social" and it would have been correct as you could use either/or for your argument... But using also known as..? No lol
EDIT: Spelling
audabon2013 wrote: »Still the same old arguments.
1. Doomsday lies about how a megaserver AH woul destroy the universe as we know it.
2. Immersion (aka social). trade spam isnt very social/immersive, sadly people like this fallback argument due to its subjective basis.