NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Not sure anyone comprehends my post.
The developer would and is making decisions and directing ideas or what would happen. A company has a group of thinkers just like us.
The ideas they talk about in public would just move to a post. Do you all like this. Yes or no and why.
No different than our posts but in this example there would be direct responses for an explained topic.
What we have today are reaction posts missing details and directions. This wouldn't determine what they put in but it gives feedback before it's put in
No idea why this was taken as allowing the customer to run the company.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Is this just me or does it not seem like a decent idea?
This ain't a democracy. It's their game, they don't have to ask us anything ...NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Why doesn't Zenimax create posts for us to vote on before and idea goes to PTS?
The people they use in house are employed by the company for thier opinion. The people on the forum are utterly random and not people who get paid for their opinion (for the most part). I know who I'd trust more.
vestmanneb17_ESO wrote: »NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Is this just me or does it not seem like a decent idea?
Camel is a horse designed by committee.
Quick answer?
Because the stuff they've announced as 'new' and 'upcoming' has been in the works for years. The stuff we won't see until next year and beyond is already under development. Very little, if any, new content is in direct response to player feedback. The best we can do, honestly, is report bugs, clitches and broken or wildly unbalanced mechanics and offer cosmetic suggestions or improvements. Some of which ( see the addition of Jerkins to light armor ) are easy and will be implemented rapidly. But huge, game-altering stuff that gets bandied about the forums will probably either never get done or is already being developed.