So when's Dragon's Blood getting nerfed?
TheBull
✭✭✭✭✭
✭
✭
It's pretty stupid as it stands. Didn't Wheeler say, "DKs still have too much survivability" about a month ago?
Update please!
Edited by TheBull on July 23, 2014 6:24PM Update please!
Killed by Sunshine 1vX How I see it.
Killed by Early Bright - Blood Flow - Magicka NB Build
Twitch - SunshineNB
Youtube - The Redguard
Killed by Early Bright - Blood Flow - Magicka NB Build
Twitch - SunshineNB
Youtube - The Redguard
40
-
dsalter✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭personally i'd rather see it either stops magicka regeneration for 5seconds (not that great but it's a nerf) or reduces the effect of your next Dragons blood cast within 10 secondsPLEASE REPLY TO ME WITH @dsalter otherwise i'm likely to miss the reply if its not my own thread
EU - [Arch Mage Dave] Altmer Sorcerer
Fight back at the crates and boxes, together we can change things.10 -
WebBull✭✭✭✭✭
✭
Just quit and then you wont have to worry about it any more. NB's seem to do fine against me if they play their role right. Might want to study up.
18 -
TheBull✭✭✭✭✭
✭
Just make it reduce damage by 90% or something. The heal allows for too much terrible play.personally i'd rather see it either stops magicka regeneration for 5seconds (not that great but it's a nerf) or reduces the effect of your next Dragons blood cast within 10 seconds
Edited by TheBull on July 23, 2014 6:32PMKilled by Sunshine 1vX How I see it.
Killed by Early Bright - Blood Flow - Magicka NB Build
Twitch - SunshineNB
Youtube - The Redguard11 -
Fi'yra✭✭✭I'm not trying to make this sound bad..
but maybe you should learn to play properly..
I'm a Dragon Knight, and I find myself using other skills rather than Dragonblood to survive, because it doesn't always give you that much of a health bonus, and if spammed you eventually run out of magicka anyway, so you have no survival after that..23 -
xaraan✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭I've played a DK and against many a DK with various classes, it's not that OP and for me has paid off more in PvE than PvP. If it needed anything, maybe a minor increase in magicka cost.-- @xaraan --
nightblade: Xaraan • templar: Xaraan-dar • dragon-knight: Xaraanosaurus • necromancer: Xaraan-qa • warden: Xaraanodon • sorcerer: Xaraan-ra
AD • NA • PC7 -
TheBull✭✭✭✭✭
✭Edited by TheBull on July 23, 2014 6:44PMKilled by Sunshine 1vX How I see it.
Killed by Early Bright - Blood Flow - Magicka NB Build
Twitch - SunshineNB
Youtube - The Redguard17 -
Cody✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
11 -
WebBull✭✭✭✭✭
✭NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
If your spamming it then you are not killing anyone........and will soon be out of Magicka24 -
Mojomonkeyman✭✭✭✭✭
✭NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
If your spamming it then you are not killing anyone........and will soon be out of Magicka
That argument helped sorcerers a lot when BE was on the table...
Koma Grey, Chocolate Thunder, Little Mojo, Dagoth Mojo & Mojomancy18 -
Cody✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭
well that's not what happens. a lot of DKs I face, will use a lot of other magic costing abilities, then use dragon blood. I get them to low health again, they, again, after having used a lot of other magic casting abilities, STILL use dragon blood. it never ends. it seems they never run out of resources. im not even sure it can at least be interrupted.NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
If your spamming it then you are not killing anyone........and will soon be out of Magicka
Edited by Cody on July 23, 2014 6:58PM5 -
onlinegamer1✭✭✭✭✭
✭NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
Um.... what?
Do you understand math? (specifically, percentages)
If you are at 40% health (meaning, you are DOWN 60%), then you get back 30% of 60%, or 20% of your total health. You are now at 60% (meaning, DOWN 40%).
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 40%, or 13%. You are now at 73% (meaning, DOWN 27 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 27%, or 9%. You are now at 82% (meaning, DOWN 18 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 18%, or 6%. You are now at 88% (meaning, DOWN 12 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 12%, or 4%. You are now at 92% (meaning, DOWN 8 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 8%, or 2.6%. You are now at 94-95% (meaning, DOWN 5 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 5%, or 1.6%. You are now at 96% (meaning, DOWN 4 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 4%, or 1.3%. You are now at 97% (meaning, DOWN 3 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 3%, or 1%. You are now at 98% (meaning, DOWN 2 %)
"Spam..... I do not thin' that word means what you thin' it means." - Enigo MontoyaEdited by onlinegamer1 on July 23, 2014 7:00PM20 -
Emperor✭✭✭✭Mojomonkeyman wrote: »NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
If your spamming it then you are not killing anyone........and will soon be out of Magicka
That argument helped sorcerers a lot when BE was on the table...
The difference is that dragon blood already gives diminishing returns when spammed so there is no need to add that kind of nerf to it.
If you spam dragon blood then you are wasting magic because it heals about 30% of MISSING health.If you like small group PvP (2-4 players) and solo PvP check out my video
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jechGImtFio
SPOILER: The first 40 seconds of the video contains a scene from the final Molag Bal boss fight!
.12 -
Mojomonkeyman✭✭✭✭✭
✭I`m sure he means infight, you know, when he finally managed to bring the DK after the first GDB down again, surviving the broken invasion-taloning so far and whoops - GDB all the way... back to 70%.
Bias is strong in here. Do you honestly think of yourself as some kind of math geniuses for pointing out the obvious despite knowing what he meant? Internet really brings out the worst in people...
I bet we see so many DKs running without it, because the skill is so mediocre.
Best regards
Edited by Mojomonkeyman on July 23, 2014 7:09PMKoma Grey, Chocolate Thunder, Little Mojo, Dagoth Mojo & Mojomancy6 -
sotonin✭✭✭onlinegamer1 wrote: »NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
Um.... what?
Do you understand math? (specifically, percentages)
If you are at 40% health (meaning, you are DOWN 60%), then you get back 30% of 60%, or 20% of your total health. You are now at 60% (meaning, DOWN 40%).
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 40%, or 13%. You are now at 73% (meaning, DOWN 27 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 27%, or 9%. You are now at 82% (meaning, DOWN 18 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 18%, or 6%. You are now at 88% (meaning, DOWN 12 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 12%, or 4%. You are now at 92% (meaning, DOWN 8 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 8%, or 2.6%. You are now at 94-95% (meaning, DOWN 5 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 5%, or 1.6%. You are now at 96% (meaning, DOWN 4 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 4%, or 1.3%. You are now at 97% (meaning, DOWN 3 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 3%, or 1%. You are now at 98% (meaning, DOWN 2 %)
"Spam..... I do not thin' that word means what you thin' it means." - Enigo Montoya
I don't know anybody who can spam it that long.... If they can then good on them for having such awesome magicka. Realistically maybe 3 times before out of mana. maybe a few more. But you are forgetting the most important part of your equation. WHILE you are spamming this your magicka is draining and you are still being attacked and losing health. so it would take a lot more than what you described to get to full. It just doesn't happen. In fact my DK's survivability is pretty damn weak compared to some other classes skill combinations.12 -
tordr86b16_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭onlinegamer1 wrote: »NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
Um.... what?
Do you understand math? (specifically, percentages)
If you are at 40% health (meaning, you are DOWN 60%), then you get back 30% of 60%, or 20% of your total health. You are now at 60% (meaning, DOWN 40%).
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 40%, or 13%. You are now at 73% (meaning, DOWN 27 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 27%, or 9%. You are now at 82% (meaning, DOWN 18 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 18%, or 6%. You are now at 88% (meaning, DOWN 12 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 12%, or 4%. You are now at 92% (meaning, DOWN 8 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 8%, or 2.6%. You are now at 94-95% (meaning, DOWN 5 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 5%, or 1.6%. You are now at 96% (meaning, DOWN 4 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 4%, or 1.3%. You are now at 97% (meaning, DOWN 3 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 3%, or 1%. You are now at 98% (meaning, DOWN 2 %)
"Spam..... I do not thin' that word means what you thin' it means." - Enigo Montoya
qft
quote this post throughout the thread. this is not rocket science. it a waste of magicka to "spam" GDB. what you all should is L2P. you got your bare spanked by a DK? boo hoo, try again.
[Moderator Note: Edited per our rules on Rude and Insulting comments]Edited by ZOS_LeroyW on July 23, 2014 8:34PM6 -
jelliedsoup✭✭✭✭✭As an NB if I can't stun a dk it's dark cloak time.www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=Ks8_KGHqmO43 -
dsalter✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭personally i'd rather see it either stops magicka regeneration for 5seconds (not that great but it's a nerf) or reduces the effect of your next Dragons blood cast within 10 secondsonlinegamer1 wrote: »NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
Um.... what?
Do you understand math? (specifically, percentages)
If you are at 40% health (meaning, you are DOWN 60%), then you get back 30% of 60%, or 20% of your total health. You are now at 60% (meaning, DOWN 40%).
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 40%, or 13%. You are now at 73% (meaning, DOWN 27 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 27%, or 9%. You are now at 82% (meaning, DOWN 18 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 18%, or 6%. You are now at 88% (meaning, DOWN 12 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 12%, or 4%. You are now at 92% (meaning, DOWN 8 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 8%, or 2.6%. You are now at 94-95% (meaning, DOWN 5 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 5%, or 1.6%. You are now at 96% (meaning, DOWN 4 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 4%, or 1.3%. You are now at 97% (meaning, DOWN 3 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 3%, or 1%. You are now at 98% (meaning, DOWN 2 %)
"Spam..... I do not thin' that word means what you thin' it means." - Enigo Montoya
I don't know anybody who can spam it that long.... If they can then good on them for having such awesome magicka. Realistically maybe 3 times before out of mana. maybe a few more. But you are forgetting the most important part of your equation. WHILE you are spamming this your magicka is draining and you are still being attacked and losing health. so it would take a lot more than what you described to get to full. It just doesn't happen. In fact my DK's survivability is pretty damn weak compared to some other classes skill combinations.
Hold Block and casting is where it shines. DK's take massive punishment while blocking and can insta cast it at the same time.PLEASE REPLY TO ME WITH @dsalter otherwise i'm likely to miss the reply if its not my own thread
EU - [Arch Mage Dave] Altmer Sorcerer
Fight back at the crates and boxes, together we can change things.1 -
Teargrants✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭It's really not that OP, it's just one of the abilities that defines DK play style. The answer is CC, as with all classes.
How do you kill a DK? CC them so they can't throw out dragons blood and scales.
How do you kill a sorc? CC them so they can't run with BE.
How do you kill a NB? CC them so they can't vanish with cloak.
How do you kill a templar? CC them so they can't heal back to full and cast blazing shield.
[Moderator-Notiz: Entsprechend unseren unseren Community-Regeln betreffend unhöfliche und beleidigende Kommentare entfernt]Edited by ZOS_JoanaL on July 25, 2014 1:46AMPOST EQVITEM SEDET ATRA CVRA
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
EP ※ Teargrants ※
EP ※ Kissgrants ※
DC ※ Kirsi ※
※ Vehemence Council ※
※ #JustOutOfRenderRange ※
~Teargrants YouTube~
┬┴┬┴┤(･_├┬┴┬┴10 -
Mojomonkeyman✭✭✭✭✭
✭So, according to your flawless logic, why did we need a nerf on BE again, Kirsika? Ah right, there`s not only black & white, but a wide variety of nuances inbetween... which make certain aspects "fun" to play against or no so "fun".
You all mustve been very vocal against the BE nerf... or it`s just bias speaking.Edited by Mojomonkeyman on July 23, 2014 9:01PMKoma Grey, Chocolate Thunder, Little Mojo, Dagoth Mojo & Mojomancy3 -
shanersimms_ESO✭✭✭onlinegamer1 wrote: »NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
Um.... what?
Do you understand math? (specifically, percentages)
If you are at 40% health (meaning, you are DOWN 60%), then you get back 30% of 60%, or 20% of your total health. You are now at 60% (meaning, DOWN 40%).
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 40%, or 13%. You are now at 73% (meaning, DOWN 27 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 27%, or 9%. You are now at 82% (meaning, DOWN 18 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 18%, or 6%. You are now at 88% (meaning, DOWN 12 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 12%, or 4%. You are now at 92% (meaning, DOWN 8 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 8%, or 2.6%. You are now at 94-95% (meaning, DOWN 5 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 5%, or 1.6%. You are now at 96% (meaning, DOWN 4 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 4%, or 1.3%. You are now at 97% (meaning, DOWN 3 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 3%, or 1%. You are now at 98% (meaning, DOWN 2 %)
"Spam..... I do not thin' that word means what you thin' it means." - Enigo Montoya
And then the ESO Gods said:
"Let there be Reflective Scales and Syrabane Set Bonus. With these our children can maintain infinite mana, immune from projectiles as their mana regens, thus sustaining a continued never-ending spam of Green Dragon's Blood which restores stam to parry anything else."
From this moment forth, Cyrodiil PvP has remained unbalanced even to this day.
The End.
-Lord Shaszahan the Archmage, of The Septim Bloodline13 -
PBpsy✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭
I agree. I have been having a lot more problems against invulnerable templars lately than invulnerable DKs when playing my NB.Just quit and then you wont have to worry about it any more. NB's seem to do fine against me if they play their role right. Might want to study up.
Edited by PBpsy on July 23, 2014 9:14PMESO forums achievementsProud fanboiElitist jerkTrollHaterFan of icontested(rainbow colors granted)3 -
Jaxom✭✭✭✭How do you kill a DK? Bring 6 friends.
How do you kill a sorc? CC them so they can't run with BE.
How do you kill a NB? Put a DoT on them so they can't cloak.
How do you kill a templar? Hold Block.
Fixed that for you. CC is really only appropriate for a Sorc due to BE. Even if you CC a DK, unless you can burst them down in the first 2 seconds from stealth, you are probably not going to win unless specifically speced to kill DK's.
NB's and Templar's are still in the bottom half of that equation. You catch a NB out of position, they are dead. If you avoid the Templar's spear knockdown, they typically arent a problem.
The problem is that after that initial burst, say you get a DK down to 20% (fairly realistic from stealth). They pop GDB twice, and they go from 20% health to around 65-70% health in a matter of a second. I'm not saying to completely destroy the skill, but if they tweaked the numbers a bit, I dont think that's unreasonable.4 -
moxiesauce✭✭✭Yea its a strong ability but damn how many times do we need a nerf, while they are at it nerf templar heals, those are just about as strong and hit other players.. so silly.3 -
Sharee✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭onlinegamer1 wrote: »NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
Um.... what?
Do you understand math? (specifically, percentages)
If you are at 40% health (meaning, you are DOWN 60%), then you get back 30% of 60%, or 20% of your total health. You are now at 60% (meaning, DOWN 40%).
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 40%, or 13%. You are now at 73% (meaning, DOWN 27 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 27%, or 9%. You are now at 82% (meaning, DOWN 18 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 18%, or 6%. You are now at 88% (meaning, DOWN 12 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 12%, or 4%. You are now at 92% (meaning, DOWN 8 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 8%, or 2.6%. You are now at 94-95% (meaning, DOWN 5 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 5%, or 1.6%. You are now at 96% (meaning, DOWN 4 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 4%, or 1.3%. You are now at 97% (meaning, DOWN 3 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 3%, or 1%. You are now at 98% (meaning, DOWN 2 %)
"Spam..... I do not thin' that word means what you thin' it means." - Enigo Montoya
That example ignores the fact the opponent is continually burning his resources trying to kill the DK. So the spam really looks more like this:
40% health -> use GDB.
40% health -> use GDB
40% health -> use GDB
while the opponent burns his resources down to nothing.
8 -
shanersimms_ESO✭✭✭onlinegamer1 wrote: »NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
Um.... what?
Do you understand math? (specifically, percentages)
If you are at 40% health (meaning, you are DOWN 60%), then you get back 30% of 60%, or 20% of your total health. You are now at 60% (meaning, DOWN 40%).
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 40%, or 13%. You are now at 73% (meaning, DOWN 27 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 27%, or 9%. You are now at 82% (meaning, DOWN 18 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 18%, or 6%. You are now at 88% (meaning, DOWN 12 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 12%, or 4%. You are now at 92% (meaning, DOWN 8 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 8%, or 2.6%. You are now at 94-95% (meaning, DOWN 5 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 5%, or 1.6%. You are now at 96% (meaning, DOWN 4 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 4%, or 1.3%. You are now at 97% (meaning, DOWN 3 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 3%, or 1%. You are now at 98% (meaning, DOWN 2 %)
"Spam..... I do not thin' that word means what you thin' it means." - Enigo Montoya
That example ignores the fact the opponent is continually burning his resources trying to kill the DK. So the spam really looks more like this:
40% health -> use GDB.
40% health -> use GDB
40% health -> use GDB
while the opponent burns his resources down to nothing.
Isn't it funny when someone criticizes someone else for "not knowing how to math" and then post such nonsense? hehehe
In any case, you are absolutely right and the aggressor is burning through far more stats than the DK who is just using his single ability to negate the damage of 3 abilities from the aggressor.-Lord Shaszahan the Archmage, of The Septim Bloodline4 -
arkansas_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭Mojomonkeyman wrote: »So, according to your flawless logic, why did we need a nerf on BE again, Kirsika? Ah right, there`s not only black & white, but a wide variety of nuances inbetween... which make certain aspects "fun" to play against or no so "fun".
You all mustve been very vocal against the BE nerf... or it`s just bias speaking.
I think BE was overpowered in terms that a lot of CC didn't affect it. If you immobilized a sorc with something like Dark Talons, they could still BE away. If you snared them heavily, they could still use it. If you tried to use Invasion to CC them before they BE'ed, they'd go down but would still teleport away, meaning you would have to use Invasion again to get within close range of them. If they wanted to rework the nerf of BE in that it's distance was affected by the snares and CC on the sorc, I'd be all for it.
ＦＯＲＵＭＰＬＡＲ
Grand Overlord 25/8/170 -
arkansas_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭shanersimms_ESO wrote: »onlinegamer1 wrote: »NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
Um.... what?
Do you understand math? (specifically, percentages)
If you are at 40% health (meaning, you are DOWN 60%), then you get back 30% of 60%, or 20% of your total health. You are now at 60% (meaning, DOWN 40%).
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 40%, or 13%. You are now at 73% (meaning, DOWN 27 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 27%, or 9%. You are now at 82% (meaning, DOWN 18 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 18%, or 6%. You are now at 88% (meaning, DOWN 12 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 12%, or 4%. You are now at 92% (meaning, DOWN 8 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 8%, or 2.6%. You are now at 94-95% (meaning, DOWN 5 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 5%, or 1.6%. You are now at 96% (meaning, DOWN 4 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 4%, or 1.3%. You are now at 97% (meaning, DOWN 3 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 3%, or 1%. You are now at 98% (meaning, DOWN 2 %)
"Spam..... I do not thin' that word means what you thin' it means." - Enigo Montoya
And then the ESO Gods said:
"Let there be Reflective Scales and Syrabane Set Bonus. With these our children can maintain infinite mana, immune from projectiles as their mana regens, thus sustaining a continued never-ending spam of Green Dragon's Blood which restores stam to parry anything else."
From this moment forth, Cyrodiil PvP has remained unbalanced even to this day.
The End.
The Syrabane set is nerfed in the PTS, and will most likely be nerfed in the server come Update 3. It's pretty much worthless now.ＦＯＲＵＭＰＬＡＲ
Grand Overlord 25/8/170 -
CapuchinSeven✭✭✭✭✭
✭onlinegamer1 wrote: »NookyZooky wrote: »
the spammability is the problem. not the effects of the ability.kb.lang_ESO wrote: »
Um.... what?
Do you understand math? (specifically, percentages)
If you are at 40% health (meaning, you are DOWN 60%), then you get back 30% of 60%, or 20% of your total health. You are now at 60% (meaning, DOWN 40%).
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 40%, or 13%. You are now at 73% (meaning, DOWN 27 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 27%, or 9%. You are now at 82% (meaning, DOWN 18 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 18%, or 6%. You are now at 88% (meaning, DOWN 12 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 12%, or 4%. You are now at 92% (meaning, DOWN 8 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 8%, or 2.6%. You are now at 94-95% (meaning, DOWN 5 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 5%, or 1.6%. You are now at 96% (meaning, DOWN 4 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 4%, or 1.3%. You are now at 97% (meaning, DOWN 3 %)
If you then "spam" it again, you get back 30% of 3%, or 1%. You are now at 98% (meaning, DOWN 2 %)
"Spam..... I do not thin' that word means what you thin' it means." - Enigo Montoya
I honestly wonder how players like you would cope playing something like a Nightblade that can literally be crippled by having a single, weak 1 hit per second DOT on them.
Your example conveniently forgets a few of the minor details to make your point sound stronger.4
