Blackwidow wrote: »fromtesonlineb16_ESO wrote: »I'm with you, I'm totally fed up with all the threads complaining of complainers.jbroin1619_ESO wrote: »All these complaints!
I'm fed up with the attitude that we shouldn't complain about complainers. If they have a right to complain, then we have a right to complain about their complaints.
If someone has an issue with the game, defend the game. Don't attack the poster. It just belittles you.
If the game is great and you can't simply bring up positive counter points, you don't have much to stand on.
Generalizing what happens on this forum as 'issues with the game' belittles humanity.
I'll point out every ridiculous piece of crap comment whenever I fell necessary.
Blackwidow wrote: »fromtesonlineb16_ESO wrote: »I'm with you, I'm totally fed up with all the threads complaining of complainers.jbroin1619_ESO wrote: »All these complaints!
I'm fed up with the attitude that we shouldn't complain about complainers. If they have a right to complain, then we have a right to complain about their complaints.
If someone has an issue with the game, defend the game. Don't attack the poster. It just belittles you.
If the game is great and you can't simply bring up positive counter points, you don't have much to stand on.
Blackwidow wrote: »Generalizing what happens on this forum as 'issues with the game' belittles humanity.
Does it really?
How does a person's view on the game belittle humanity?I'll point out every ridiculous piece of crap comment whenever I fell necessary.
Yes. Attack the comment on the game. Disagree with the post. Give counter points. Great.
However, attacking posters for their comments just makes you look rude and does nothing to sway anyone's opinion on the subject.
If you just want to bully a person for what he posts, I can't stop you. However, just know it is childish to do so and serves no purpose other than to cause a flame war.
Are you accusing me of something?
I said I will complain about complaints and then you preach some random philosophy as if you think I am guilty of something.
I find it amusing that you think all those who have issues with the game are console gamers who expect a finished game without issues.
What does that say about PC gamers and MMOs? That they expect substandard, bug-riddled, incomplete games?
Amusing.
You over simplify the negativity on this forum as 'complaints' when it's far beyond that.
It's more like constant whining about unspecified 'bugs'
redundant negative opinions from people saying they don't like the game.
At some point, you have to wonder why they are still here.
Do they believe they can really change something that so many others actually like
, or are they just here to start trouble?
Whatever the reason, if they are going to complain nonstop, they I have a right to voice an opinion of how annoying it is. It's only fair.
You over simplify the negativity on this forum as 'complaints' when it's far beyond that. It's more like constant whining about unspecified 'bugs' and redundant negative opinions from people saying they don't like the game. At some point, you have to wonder why they are still here. Do they believe they can really change something that so many others actually like, or are they just here to start trouble? Whatever the reason, if they are going to complain nonstop, then I have a right to voice an opinion of how annoying it is. It's only fair.
You over simplify the negativity on this forum as 'complaints' when it's far beyond that. It's more like constant whining about unspecified 'bugs' and redundant negative opinions from people saying they don't like the game. At some point, you have to wonder why they are still here. Do they believe they can really change something that so many others actually like, or are they just here to start trouble? Whatever the reason, if they are going to complain nonstop, then I have a right to voice an opinion of how annoying it is. It's only fair.
How appropriate, you over simplify the complaints as whining. I fail to see how you are more righteous, or more worthy of having your will be done, than any of those you try to put down.
EDIT: Some of it is pretty unpleasant, I agree. But, I tend to just leave it and move on. Better use of my time.
jbroin1619_ESO wrote: »"It is amazing to hear how much everyone complains that an MMO was launched "unfinished" MMOs are NEVER finished! World of Warcraft was launched with almost no content past level 40. Hell, Maraudon wasn't even in the game yet. The issue lies with console gamers making the switch to online games and expecting a complete entity. this game will never be fixed, it will never be balanced, there will always be bugs that people find ... its the life of an MMO! So, rather than wallowing in negativity, how about we start enjoying what is RIGHT with the game, because, seriously ..there are ALOT more things good in this game than most others when they launch! I have been at the launch of about 12 MMOs and this was one of the smoothest launches I have ever been a part of!
Online games, in their beginnings, go through a lot of hell for the first year or so. enjoy the game for whats good about it and have a bit of faith that they will take pride in their product and always keep moving forward!
stop expecting a finished product and enjoy the living, always changing, world of ONLINE GAMES!"
I used this as a comment to someone elses post and figured it was worthy of its own title!
IKilled007 wrote: »Some of these fanbois crack me up. The game is absolutely perfect as is, and no complaints will be tolerated. But wait! What's that? Zenimax says that this or that is not working as intended or is a bug, and changes it. NOW the game is perfect, say the fanbois. It was perfect before when it was wrong, and now that it is corrected, it is also perfect. But wait! Zeni changes the changes! It's still perfect! The game can only exist in one state of being: perfection.
TheGrandAlliance wrote: »...apparetnly you never talked to RPers (WoW or otherwise) before. Perhaps not aware of Slyvannas Windrunner? Thrall? So on so forth.
WoW is built around many core characters and stories, with 1345123412423 of pages of backstory (you can read on wowpedia.org). With ESO: Of course there is generally TES story but characters in this game are very limited.
If you notice my username perhaps that would answer your question alas case in point ESO wise: PvPers don't care about lore. PvEers don't care about Emperor Title.
Thus.... /epicfail ESO (although main story has potential at least)...
You keep using /epicfail. I do not think it means what you think it means.
My point still stands. In 11 years of playing MMO's, going to gaming conventions, lan parties, and hanging out at the local gameshops, I have not heard a single person talk about or otherwise mention the lore or story in WoW, nor the characters. I've heard a great deal about other games (the Lineage series, EQ, GW), but no WoW. If I had I would have bothered to take the time to look at it, rather than dismissing the game out of hand as I have.
EDIT: BTW, there are only 101,166 pages on the wiki. And while that beats TES at only 24,882, that means very little when it comes to how good the story is. Merely the amount of information or content available.
Blackwidow wrote: »fromtesonlineb16_ESO wrote: »I'm with you, I'm totally fed up with all the threads complaining of complainers.jbroin1619_ESO wrote: »All these complaints!
I'm fed up with the attitude that we shouldn't complain about complainers. If they have a right to complain, then we have a right to complain about their complaints.
If someone has an issue with the game, defend the game. Don't attack the poster. It just belittles you.
If the game is great and you can't simply bring up positive counter points, you don't have much to stand on.
This.
Why thank you.jbroin1619_ESO wrote: »GreySix ✭✭✭✭✭ you sir obviously have an extended vocabulary, and a slight mastery of the written language.
Well, you're sniffing down the right trail, but unfortunately barking up the wrong tree. In this case, it is my wife who lacks the "twich keyboard-warrior" skills to survive solo dungeons full of bosses and baddies. And she's hardly alone, as we know many right here in the forums faced similar challenges. Sadly, many of those folks were told to L2P or leave, when they asked why no cooperative play. And so they left, and continue to leave.jbroin1619_ESO wrote: »This talent does not hide the fact that you simply are upset that you have to do some character development and solo content for a slight time during your experience in the game.
Nor does it state a requirement to solo content. Yet in this MMO, that requirement exists in the main story, effectively serving as a gate between completion of said solo-only content and most of the game's content. Therein lay my issue.jbroin1619_ESO wrote: »MMO = Massive Multi-player Online ... no where in that description does it say that people HAVE to group up, nor does it state that people are required to have the option to join a group! All it means (which, through your understanding of language) is that multiple people are playing this at the same time you are.
After all I've written, folks are still confused?jbroin1619_ESO wrote: »what are you really mad at?
moonsugar66 wrote: »@GreySix
Ya know, I think this is the first MMO that has forced solo content. If I'm wrong then someone should provide an example.
Never heard of that. Was it a "AAA" MMO, and was its forced-solo content part of the game's main storyline?moonsugar66 wrote: »@GreySix
Ya know, I think this is the first MMO that has forced solo content. If I'm wrong then someone should provide an example.
The Secret World did it.
This is their first MMO as Zenimax Online, but this is in no means the first MMO of this development team.Alphashado wrote: »Especially since this is their first MMO. They need feedback of all types.
Never heard of that. Was it a "AAA" MMO, and was its forced-solo content part of the game's main storyline?moonsugar66 wrote: »@GreySix
Ya know, I think this is the first MMO that has forced solo content. If I'm wrong then someone should provide an example.
The Secret World did it.
Note: If so, then that may explain why I've never heard of it.