Elder Scrolls Online Free To Play Pros And Cons

david271749
david271749
✭✭✭✭✭
I want to hear what people honestly think of what this game would/could be like under a free to play model. I'd like to see some pros and cons from everybody. I know there is a lot of debate over this, so I'd really like to hear from both sides.
  • AelyinESO
    AelyinESO
    ✭✭✭
    In my opinion: I prefer to pay a sub and have a good game improvements wout spend more money, than a F2P game, since many F2P games I've played, you need to just spend tons of money to keep your char playing.

    But, as we see, including many complains, a huge delay of progress for now we dunno the future of ESO.

    I'm afraid when they release console game, they will forget even more us PC Gamers.

    I dunno that it's a fake or not, but according to this Interview, game won't be F2P for now, and they don't intend to do:
    Paul D. Sage: No, we don’t have any plans that I am aware of to change it in the future. You know the business model is what the business model is and it allows us to deliver high level content on regular basis right now. So there are no plans that I am aware of.

    Leonid Melikhov: The Elder Scrolls Online will be one of the few titles that will have subscription based service. Considering that games like Star Wars the Old Republic started out the same way but went free-to-play since subscription based model didn’t work, why not lean towards more of a free-to-play concept?

    Paul D. Sage: You know again, we have no plans to change subscription plans.

    Read more at http://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-online-interview-business-model-is-what-the-business-model-is#saaGfJgXvySj2csy.99

    Link: http://gamingbolt.com/the-elder-scrolls-online-interview-business-model-is-what-the-business-model-is
    NA PC Server - CP810 - Played Since Beta 2014, but left for 4 years, coz games got unbalancing, boring and too much expensive (still?)

    - MagSorc (50) - DPS
    - MagTem (50) - Healer
    - StamDK (50) - Tank
    - StamNecro (50) - DPS
    - StamTem (developing) - DPS
    - MagNecro (developing) - DPS
    - MagWard (developing) - Healer
    - Stamblade (developing) - DPS


    "Stop nerfing Sorcerers please"
    "Stop putting most interesting items inside a lucky Crate costing money"
  • Cudda
    Cudda
    ✭✭✭
    This forum is free to play (as in you dont need to pay to actively post)

    I think the Cons are obvious dont you?


    To elaborate a bit.

    People would deliberately log in to ESO, just to cause grief. Just like people post on these forums, just to cause grief.

    I really want ESO to come out to console. Just because there are 2 pay walls (on xbox) They have to pay their xbox live fee, and their game sub, just to complain.
    Edited by Cudda on July 1, 2014 12:24AM
  • Ser Lobo
    Ser Lobo
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    On the most basic level, in a subscription-based game, developers focus on delivering more content so that players will be entertained and subscribe again the next month.

    On a free-to-play model, those same developers focus more on delivering cash-shop content that will entice you to buy it, with content as a distant backdrop just to keep the game going.

    Both are focused on making money. One wants players to keep coming back and playing month after month, the other wants players to keep spending in the cash shop month after month. I personally prefer the former over the later as a focus goal.



    Now, if we were to break down fellow gamers, I prefer the crowd of gamers that play sub-based games over those that play free-to-play games. In a sub based game we are all supporting the system. In a free to play game, those players with money are supporting those players without.

    And honestly, I have little respect for those who have the time to play MMO's, but not make $15 extra in a month. Internet costs much more than that. This is the same way I feel about people who stay on unemployment even when they could go out and get work tomorrow, because it's free cash and why would they ruin it?
    Ruze Aulus. Mayor of Dhalmora. Archer, hunter, assassin. Nightblade.
    Gral. Mountain Terror. Barbarian, marauder, murderer. Nightblade.
    Na'Djin. Knight-Blade. Knight, vanguard, defender. Nightblade.

    XBOX NA
    Ruze is a veteran of the PC Beta, lived through the year one drought, survived the buy-to-play conversion, and has stepped foot in the hells known as Craglorn. He mained a nightlbade when nightblades weren't good, and has never worn a robe. He converted from PC during the console betas, and hasn't regretted it a moment since.

    He'd rank ESO:TU (in it's current state) a 4.8 out of 5, loving the game almost entirely.

    This is an multiplayer game. I should be able to log in, join a dungeon, join a battleground, queue for a dolmen or world boss or delve, teleport in, play for 20 minutes, and not worry about getting kicked, failing to join, having perfect voice coms, or being unable to complete content because someone's lagging behind. Group Finder and matchmaking is broken. Take a note from Destiny and build a system that allows from drop-in/drop-out functionality and quick play.
  • Cudda
    Cudda
    ✭✭✭
    And honestly, I have little respect for those who have the time to play MMO's, but not make $15 extra in a month. Internet costs much more than that. This is the same way I feel about people who stay on unemployment even when they could go out and get work tomorrow, because it's free cash and why would they ruin it?

    You think people don't want to pay $15 a month because they "can't afford it". When in reality, they probably make more than you could ever dream of.

    It is people with money, that like to hold on to their money. It's the fools that throw their cash out the window when not needed.

    A quality game, deserves a cash flow. A poor quality game does not.

    My comment is not related to ESO, but is related to your unintelligent comment about who you have "little respect for" and should be given that same small amount of respect, due to your ignorance.

    Good day.
  • Maverick827
    Maverick827
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cudda wrote: »
    This forum is free to play (as in you dont need to pay to actively post)
    I'm pretty sure you do.

    The pros of F2P, for me, is the reduction of some of the absurd grinds and tedious gameplay features that are really ruining the game for me right now. Instead of paying $15/month for:

    1. VR Grind
    2. Epic recipe grind
    3. Inventory management annoyances
    4. Respec/multi spec annoyances

    I'd be able to pay:

    1. $2 for experience potions that make me level faster
    2. $3 for the epic recipe that I've been trying to get for a while
    3. $5 to unlock all inventory/bank space
    4. $5 to unlock a second/third spec

    This would be a much more enjoyable game for me, being able to run max-level content with my friends, easily trying out different builds, not being bogged down by my inventory when soloing/farming.
  • Cudda
    Cudda
    ✭✭✭
    Cudda wrote: »
    This forum is free to play (as in you dont need to pay to actively post)
    I'm pretty sure you do.
    I know for 100% you don't :disagree:
    Edited by Cudda on July 1, 2014 12:33AM
  • Maverick827
    Maverick827
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cudda wrote: »
    Cudda wrote: »
    This forum is free to play (as in you dont need to pay to actively post)
    I'm pretty sure you do.
    I know for 100% you don't :disagree:
    What, do you just need an account that was once a subscriber? Because you can't just sign up.
  • badmojo
    badmojo
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Con: I'd probably quit playing.
    [DC/NA]
  • Cudda
    Cudda
    ✭✭✭
    The pros of F2P, for me, is the reduction of some of the absurd grinds and tedious gameplay features that are really ruining the game for me right now. Instead of paying $15/month for:

    1. VR Grind
    2. Epic recipe grind
    3. Inventory management annoyances
    4. Respec/multi spec annoyances

    I'd be able to pay:

    1. $5 for experience potions that make me level faster
    2. $30 for the epic recipe that I've been trying to get for a while
    3. $50 to unlock all inventory
    4. $50 to unlock all bank space
    5. $50 to unlock a secondspec
    6. $50 to unlock a third spec

    This would be a much more enjoyable game for me, being able to run max-level content with my friends, easily trying out different builds, not being bogged down by my inventory when soloing/farming.

    Fixed your prices to resemble an actual expectation of what it would cost.
  • Armianlee
    Armianlee
    ✭✭✭
    badmojo wrote: »
    Con: I'd probably quit playing.

    That is a major con right there. I couldn't play without badmojo.






    psst What's your toons name again?
    Basic circle of complaints on ESO Forums:
    1) Users: Fix game/class/bug
    2) Zenimax Online: Brings servers down and fixes issues and deploys patches.
    3) Users: OMG SERVERS ARE DOWN!!!!!
    4) Zenimax Online: Brings servers back up!
    5) See 1)

    VR10 Sword and Board Templar (Heavy Armour), Ebonheart Pact
    LVL 25 Sorcerer, Daggerfall Covenant
    LVL 28 DK, Ebonheart Pact
    LVL 15 Nightblade, Altmari Dominion
  • Akhratos
    Akhratos
    ✭✭✭✭
    PROs - No monthly fee.
    CONs - Everything else.
    Edited by Akhratos on July 1, 2014 12:38AM
  • badmojo
    badmojo
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Armianlee wrote: »
    badmojo wrote: »
    Con: I'd probably quit playing.

    That is a major con right there. I couldn't play without badmojo.






    psst What's your toons name again?

    There wouldn't be much a game left without me.

    It's Sadiaa, Torbal, Mohj, and a few others.
    [DC/NA]
  • Cudda
    Cudda
    ✭✭✭
    Cudda wrote: »
    Cudda wrote: »
    This forum is free to play (as in you dont need to pay to actively post)
    I'm pretty sure you do.
    I know for 100% you don't :disagree:
    What, do you just need an account that was once a subscriber? Because you can't just sign up.

    Never was a subscriber. I just signed up.
  • Armianlee
    Armianlee
    ✭✭✭
    Cudda wrote: »
    Cudda wrote: »
    Cudda wrote: »
    This forum is free to play (as in you dont need to pay to actively post)
    I'm pretty sure you do.
    I know for 100% you don't :disagree:
    What, do you just need an account that was once a subscriber? Because you can't just sign up.

    Never was a subscriber. I just signed up.

    You're [snip] me?

    [Moderator Note: Edited per our rules on Cursing & Profanity]
    Edited by ZOS_JoanaL on July 1, 2014 1:42AM
    Basic circle of complaints on ESO Forums:
    1) Users: Fix game/class/bug
    2) Zenimax Online: Brings servers down and fixes issues and deploys patches.
    3) Users: OMG SERVERS ARE DOWN!!!!!
    4) Zenimax Online: Brings servers back up!
    5) See 1)

    VR10 Sword and Board Templar (Heavy Armour), Ebonheart Pact
    LVL 25 Sorcerer, Daggerfall Covenant
    LVL 28 DK, Ebonheart Pact
    LVL 15 Nightblade, Altmari Dominion
  • SoulScream
    SoulScream
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I used to think all the FTP talk for ESO didn't have a hope but now the game is so messed up I am concerned. I try to play and get the super slow FPS bug and have to constantly relog. It's tough to play right now.
  • Cudda
    Cudda
    ✭✭✭
    Armianlee wrote: »
    Cudda wrote: »
    Cudda wrote: »
    Cudda wrote: »
    This forum is free to play (as in you dont need to pay to actively post)
    I'm pretty sure you do.
    I know for 100% you don't :disagree:
    What, do you just need an account that was once a subscriber? Because you can't just sign up.

    Never was a subscriber. I just signed up.

    You're [snip] me?
    Nope,

    Joined November 2013

    Game wasn't even out.

    Also, the forums were not out either. Forums you had to sign up at release. Which I did not buy the game at release.
    Edited by ZOS_JoanaL on July 1, 2014 1:50AM
  • Armianlee
    Armianlee
    ✭✭✭
    Cudda wrote: »
    Armianlee wrote: »
    Cudda wrote: »
    Cudda wrote: »
    Cudda wrote: »
    This forum is free to play (as in you dont need to pay to actively post)
    I'm pretty sure you do.
    I know for 100% you don't :disagree:
    What, do you just need an account that was once a subscriber? Because you can't just sign up.

    Never was a subscriber. I just signed up.

    You're shitting me?
    Nope,

    Joined November 2013

    Game wasn't even out.

    Also, the forums were not out either. Forums you had to sign up at release. Which I did not buy the game at release.

    Didn't they just move the people from Beta over? That is how I figured I had my account here already even though I never signed up at release.
    Basic circle of complaints on ESO Forums:
    1) Users: Fix game/class/bug
    2) Zenimax Online: Brings servers down and fixes issues and deploys patches.
    3) Users: OMG SERVERS ARE DOWN!!!!!
    4) Zenimax Online: Brings servers back up!
    5) See 1)

    VR10 Sword and Board Templar (Heavy Armour), Ebonheart Pact
    LVL 25 Sorcerer, Daggerfall Covenant
    LVL 28 DK, Ebonheart Pact
    LVL 15 Nightblade, Altmari Dominion
  • hk11
    hk11
    ✭✭✭✭
    I'm not sure of the pros. I would need to see the business model first. It would need to not nickel and dime you to death over inventory space etc, but instead offer new classes etc that you have to unlock via money. Rift seems to do a decent job with it.

    Cons: BR
    Edited by hk11 on July 1, 2014 12:55AM
  • wrlifeboil
    wrlifeboil
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    If ZOS were considering f2p, they should try some variation of Wildstar's CREDD or Eve Online's plex system to see how much demand there is for buy2win in eso.

    That said, I'm not worried about eso going f2p any time soon. Maybe next year if the numbers aren't great it might be time to start worrying about f2p. But for now, no worries.
    Edited by wrlifeboil on July 1, 2014 12:57AM
  • Maverick827
    Maverick827
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cudda wrote: »
    The pros of F2P, for me, is the reduction of some of the absurd grinds and tedious gameplay features that are really ruining the game for me right now. Instead of paying $15/month for:

    1. VR Grind
    2. Epic recipe grind
    3. Inventory management annoyances
    4. Respec/multi spec annoyances

    I'd be able to pay:

    1. $5 for experience potions that make me level faster
    2. $30 for the epic recipe that I've been trying to get for a while
    3. $50 to unlock all inventory
    4. $50 to unlock all bank space
    5. $50 to unlock a secondspec
    6. $50 to unlock a third spec

    This would be a much more enjoyable game for me, being able to run max-level content with my friends, easily trying out different builds, not being bogged down by my inventory when soloing/farming.

    Fixed your prices to resemble an actual expectation of what it would cost.
    If you believe those values are accurate, then you've never played a quality F2P MMO like SWTOR or RIFT and are instead just making up numbers over some irrational fear of "free to play."
  • Cudda
    Cudda
    ✭✭✭
    Well, my wife as an account, and she was never in beta or ever bought the game. I just signed up incase she wanted to play. I did this around February or so. So she didn't have a previous beta account.
  • Armianlee
    Armianlee
    ✭✭✭
    Cudda wrote: »
    Well, my wife as an account, and she was never in beta or ever bought the game. I just signed up incase she wanted to play. I did this around February or so. So she didn't have a previous beta account.

    LOL, and here is the forum mods saying that when you no longer have any time remaining you can no longer post and only people who have active time can create an account.
    Basic circle of complaints on ESO Forums:
    1) Users: Fix game/class/bug
    2) Zenimax Online: Brings servers down and fixes issues and deploys patches.
    3) Users: OMG SERVERS ARE DOWN!!!!!
    4) Zenimax Online: Brings servers back up!
    5) See 1)

    VR10 Sword and Board Templar (Heavy Armour), Ebonheart Pact
    LVL 25 Sorcerer, Daggerfall Covenant
    LVL 28 DK, Ebonheart Pact
    LVL 15 Nightblade, Altmari Dominion
  • Soloeus
    Soloeus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I want to hear what people honestly think of what this game would/could be like under a free to play model. I'd like to see some pros and cons from everybody. I know there is a lot of debate over this, so I'd really like to hear from both sides.

    There are no pro's, other than the game is littered with more garbage players and bots.

    Cons:

    1. Game becomes a cash grab.
    2. Development Focus only on microtransactions.
    3. P2W environment.
    4. F2P games are always more expensive than P2P.

    I am simply not going to play a game that caters to Rich People giving them everything just because money. At this point you no longer have a game, you have a cruise activity or the yacht club.

    Within; Without.
  • SFBryan18
    SFBryan18
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Won't happen for years.
  • Lalai
    Lalai
    ✭✭✭✭
    Armianlee wrote: »
    Cudda wrote: »
    Well, my wife as an account, and she was never in beta or ever bought the game. I just signed up incase she wanted to play. I did this around February or so. So she didn't have a previous beta account.

    LOL, and here is the forum mods saying that when you no longer have any time remaining you can no longer post and only people who have active time can create an account.

    If you were signed up during beta, but never bought the game, you can post. If you bought the game and cancelled your sub, then you'll be unable to continue to post when your sub expires. I let my sub expire while I was moving since I couldn't play anyway, and I couldn't post at all until all was reactivated. I don't think you can post if you try and sign up for an account after release either.
    Fisher extraordinaire!
    Send me your worms, crawlers, guts, and insect parts.
    Templar Healer
    Daggerfall Covenant, NA
  • Cudda
    Cudda
    ✭✭✭
    maybe that is true, I have not tested that theory. :disappointed_relieved:
    Edited by Cudda on July 1, 2014 1:14AM
  • Cogo
    Cogo
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sub = cheap
    Free-to-play = expensive
    Oghur Hatemachine, Guild leader of The Nephilim - EU Megaserver
    Orc Weapon Specialist and Warchief of the Ebonheart Pact - Trueflame Cyrodiil War Campaign
    Guildsite: The Nephilim

    "I don't agree with what you are saying, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it"
    -Voltaire

    "My build? Improvise, overcome and adapt!"
  • Mescalamba
    Mescalamba
    ✭✭✭
    If implemented best way possible (and that is doable), then is F2P fine. Problem is, its very hard to find balance between getting money from players and sucking them dry.

    Given how ZOS is currently doing with regular subscription model and at start they managed to make some pretty serious flops, I dont think its even remotely good idea to consider moving to F2P.
    Proud owner of personal vampire and werewolf army (4 werewolves/4 vampires)..

    I'm also using large doses of irony and sarcasm.

    Plus Im mean person, cause I really dont have reason to like you. Or anyone.
  • kevlarto_ESO
    kevlarto_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't play so called free to play games, one reason if you want any kind of a game expereince, gona cost you far more that 14.99 a month, Con for me I would not be here.. :(
    I have tried many f2p games none of them could keep me more than a few weeks at best.
    Edited by kevlarto_ESO on July 1, 2014 1:22AM
  • ThePonzzz
    ThePonzzz
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    When you remove the subscription, you introduce more DLC and microtransactions. I'd rather continue paying a subscription as long as I don't have to keep buying DLC/software at every update. F2P (Free-to-Play) isn't terrible. But when it becomes P2W (Pay-to-Win), that's when you have issues.
Sign In or Register to comment.