AnduinTryggva wrote: »Considering that we can produce really bad and cruel scenes with torture tools, skelletons, "fresh" bone body parts" etc. I don't see an issue here.
AnduinTryggva wrote: »Considering that we can produce really bad and cruel scenes with torture tools, skelletons, "fresh" bone body parts" etc. I don't see an issue here.
So I read the title of your thread and my mind immediately went.... somewhere dark.
Yes, you're right about some of the furnishings being quite horrific. None of those are to my tastes but they exist.
Yes, violence and death are common and core in many computer games, including this one.
But there's still a line between what most people would regard as decent and not and I think most would agree that this idea is on the wrong side of that line, regardless of what you personally would do with it.
In the game, all of the companions are alive. Death for them (and players) isn't permanent. Being able to place their dead bodies as furnishings necessarily implies harming them grievously for personal pleasure or benefit.
Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »So being able to place charred and screaming corpses of „nobodies“ is ok but a knocked out bastian is way out of line?
AnduinTryggva wrote: »I get what you are saying. It is a valid point
AnduinTryggva wrote: »Actually to put it straight, I was more thinking about dead mounts and just expanded it to companions, as I don't see much difference with other dead stuff we can place inside our homes.
SilverBride wrote: »A dead horse would slowly decompose and stink up the place.
The line isn't necessarily completely consistent or logical, but it exists, is clear, and ZO as a business has many reasons to stay on the right side of it.
Apart from potentially losing customers and inciting a social-media hell-storm, they're subject to ratings approval boards in jurisdictions across the entire planet.