bjeardoeb14_ESO wrote: »horizon011b14_ESO wrote: »This game is offline again and again..
change the name.
I PAID for early access with the pre-order, hence the 35 days of ONLINE time with an ONLINE company and announcing on the same day of taking the server down, does not constitute advanced warning to the customer who purchased the early access over a month ago, AS ADVERTISED.
Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline,Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline...there I feel better.
Actually you're wrong, you didn't pay for 35 Days of Online time. You paid for access to the system when it was online. You need to carefully read the Terms of Service, and the End User Licensing Agreement.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »offodapreub18_ESO wrote: »
Scheduled maintenance. with notice. for a working game. Early access was not supposed to be Beta 2.0, & the community is owed compensation.
It includes unscheduled, emergency maintenance as well. You are not owed anything, especially since you didn't pay anything extra for this early access time. You haven't lost any money.
wrong, unless you are saying that you didn't pay anything for the game. We ordered a package, just because we can't tell you how much the early access portion of the package costs doesn't mean it wasn't part of the purchased package. A car with a radio and cruise control added into the package doesn't mean you paid nothing for the features.
bjeardoeb14_ESO wrote: »horizon011b14_ESO wrote: »This game is offline again and again..
change the name.
I PAID for early access with the pre-order, hence the 35 days of ONLINE time with an ONLINE company and announcing on the same day of taking the server down, does not constitute advanced warning to the customer who purchased the early access over a month ago, AS ADVERTISED.
Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline,Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline, Elder Scrolls Offline...there I feel better.
Actually you're wrong, you didn't pay for 35 Days of Online time. You paid for access to the system when it was online. You need to carefully read the Terms of Service, and the End User Licensing Agreement.
Actually I need to carefully PAY for ONLINE services that STAY ONLINE and posting the same day that the servers are taken down does not constitute advance warning or scheduled downtime. And no where in the ADVERTISED early access that I PAID FOR, was there as message saying, "Oh BTW you might only get 3 days of the 5 days that you are purchasing a month ahead of time."
LoreRunner wrote: »Early Access - Able to access something earlier than others (Yup, could access the game before release 5 days for some, 3 for others. If you accessed it even once you achieved that goal)
Advanced Warning - technically a double statement since Warning indicates something to occur later already. But a warning that something will occur. (Yep, had both a forum post about it almost an hour before and warning in game before servers went down)
Terms of Service - Something you agree to with the understanding that the company abides by it as well. We agreed to accept that sometimes the servers would be down and that ZOS would work hard to keep them up as much as possible)
Hmmm, looking at these three pieces of information, I am trying to figure out where ZOS lied or cheated us.
bjeardoeb14_ESO wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »offodapreub18_ESO wrote: »
Scheduled maintenance. with notice. for a working game. Early access was not supposed to be Beta 2.0, & the community is owed compensation.
It includes unscheduled, emergency maintenance as well. You are not owed anything, especially since you didn't pay anything extra for this early access time. You haven't lost any money.
wrong, unless you are saying that you didn't pay anything for the game. We ordered a package, just because we can't tell you how much the early access portion of the package costs doesn't mean it wasn't part of the purchased package. A car with a radio and cruise control added into the package doesn't mean you paid nothing for the features.
You're wrong. Read the ToS and EULA. You don't know what you actually paid for, you just think you do. You paid for access to the system when it was available. It's not currently available so you're not really losing anything as others have stated.
Some MMOs back in the day were Pay-Per-Minute or Pay-Per-Hour, we can return to that payment model if you like and then when the system is down, you're not losing anything because you aren't playing and using your minutes or hours up.
horizon011b14_ESO wrote: »atleast EA's battlefield was still ONLINE even with its bugs lol
Jonnymorrow wrote: »OP has a point if you ask me, far to much downtime already. I couldnt care a less if they are prepping it for launch. The early access I paid for didnt include 10-12 hours downtime in 5 days.
Worse thing is this downtime is right in EU prime time. So thanks for that.
horizon011b14_ESO wrote: »I think this game is 1 more event away from being the worst launched """"""online""""" game
atleast EA's battlefield was still ONLINE even with its bugs lol
bjeardoeb14_ESO wrote: »LoreRunner wrote: »Early Access - Able to access something earlier than others (Yup, could access the game before release 5 days for some, 3 for others. If you accessed it even once you achieved that goal)
Advanced Warning - technically a double statement since Warning indicates something to occur later already. But a warning that something will occur. (Yep, had both a forum post about it almost an hour before and warning in game before servers went down)
Terms of Service - Something you agree to with the understanding that the company abides by it as well. We agreed to accept that sometimes the servers would be down and that ZOS would work hard to keep them up as much as possible)
Hmmm, looking at these three pieces of information, I am trying to figure out where ZOS lied or cheated us.
I'm glad to see some people get it!
LoreRunner wrote: »Early Access - Able to access something earlier than others (Yup, could access the game before release 5 days for some, 3 for others. If you accessed it even once you achieved that goal)
Advanced Warning - technically a double statement since Warning indicates something to occur later already. But a warning that something will occur. (Yep, had both a forum post about it almost an hour before and warning in game before servers went down)
Terms of Service - Something you agree to with the understanding that the company abides by it as well. We agreed to accept that sometimes the servers would be down and that ZOS would work hard to keep them up as much as possible)
Hmmm, looking at these three pieces of information, I am trying to figure out where ZOS lied or cheated us.
Flagrantavidityub17_ESO wrote: »ESO is the best launch I have experienced from an MMORPG.
TheVindelator wrote: »Downtime is absolutely expected and understandable for an MMO. It sucks but it happens.
Still, added a free day or two to everyone's sub would do wonders for PR. After all, when 5 days early access becomes 3-4 days people get annoyed.
bjeardoeb14_ESO wrote: »LoreRunner wrote: »Early Access - Able to access something earlier than others (Yup, could access the game before release 5 days for some, 3 for others. If you accessed it even once you achieved that goal)
Advanced Warning - technically a double statement since Warning indicates something to occur later already. But a warning that something will occur. (Yep, had both a forum post about it almost an hour before and warning in game before servers went down)
Terms of Service - Something you agree to with the understanding that the company abides by it as well. We agreed to accept that sometimes the servers would be down and that ZOS would work hard to keep them up as much as possible)
Hmmm, looking at these three pieces of information, I am trying to figure out where ZOS lied or cheated us.
I'm glad to see some people get it!
1. No where in the early access purchase did it explain "if you access it even once" that you got your full 3-day or 5-days of access. So that is FALSE ADVERTISING. You pay for the service to be online for 30 days and you paid extra to get 35 days of online service with your pre-order. That is a reasonable customer expectation of someone who went to the Zos Store and placed their order over a month ago.
2. Advance Warning is an expression that means you won't be surprised when it happens. And posting the same day that the servers are taken down DOES SURPRISE all that had purchased the early access over a month ago.
3. Referring this offline time to a reference in the TOS/EULA is not justification for posting the same day of taking the servers down for early access customers. AND not putting any of this up-front in the description of the pre-order purchase in the Zos Retail Store is just BAD BUSINESS. Again reasonable customer expectation.
So FALSE ADVERTISING then as far as the early access that everyone paid for a month in advance. A burying crucial details in lengthy TOS/EULAs is not justification for what is clearly FALSE ADVERTISING and BAD BUSINESS from an ONLINE SERVICE.
I agree to pay online services for being online. And posting the same day of taking the servers down does not constitute advance warning or scheduled downtime. And no where in the ADVERTISED early access that I PAID FOR, was there a message saying, "Oh BTW you might only get 3 days of the 5 days that you are purchasing a month ahead of time." Again, burying that in a TOS/EULA is not justification for POOR CUSTOMER SERVICE.
bjeardoeb14_ESO wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »offodapreub18_ESO wrote: »
Scheduled maintenance. with notice. for a working game. Early access was not supposed to be Beta 2.0, & the community is owed compensation.
It includes unscheduled, emergency maintenance as well. You are not owed anything, especially since you didn't pay anything extra for this early access time. You haven't lost any money.
wrong, unless you are saying that you didn't pay anything for the game. We ordered a package, just because we can't tell you how much the early access portion of the package costs doesn't mean it wasn't part of the purchased package. A car with a radio and cruise control added into the package doesn't mean you paid nothing for the features.
You're wrong. Read the ToS and EULA. You don't know what you actually paid for, you just think you do. You paid for access to the system when it was available. It's not currently available so you're not really losing anything as others have stated.
Some MMOs back in the day were Pay-Per-Minute or Pay-Per-Hour, we can return to that payment model if you like and then when the system is down, you're not losing anything because you aren't playing and using your minutes or hours up.
So FALSE ADVERTISING then as far as the early access that everyone paid for a month in advance. A burying crucial details in lengthy TOS/EULAs is not justification for what is clearly FALSE ADVERTISING and BAD BUSINESS from an ONLINE SERVICE.
I agree to pay online services for being online. And posting the same day of taking the servers down does not constitute advance warning or scheduled downtime. And no where in the ADVERTISED early access that I PAID FOR, was there a message saying, "Oh BTW you might only get 3 days of the 5 days that you are purchasing a month ahead of time." Again, burying that in a TOS/EULA is not justification for POOR CUSTOMER SERVICE.
Flagrantavidityub17_ESO wrote: »ESO is the best launch I have experienced from an MMORPG.
Really? Seems like its meeting the status quo if you ask me.
Few bugs, little bit of down time, average communication. Pretty much the industry standard for any MMO launch and has been for over 10 years.
I would say this launch has been no better or worse than any other game I've played.
1. No where in the early access purchase did it explain "if you access it even once" that you got your full 3-day or 5-days of access. So that is FALSE ADVERTISING. You pay for the service to be online for 30 days and you paid extra to get 35 days of online service with your pre-order. That is a reasonable customer expectation of someone who went to the Zos Store and placed their order over a month ago.
2. Advance Warning is an expression that means you won't be surprised when it happens. And posting the same day that the servers are taken down DOES SURPRISE all that had purchased the early access over a month ago.
3. Referring this offline time to a reference in the TOS/EULA is not justification for posting the same day of taking the servers down for early access customers. AND not putting any of this up-front in the description of the pre-order purchase in the Zos Retail Store is just BAD BUSINESS. Again reasonable customer expectation.
I agree to pay online services for being online. And posting the same day of taking the servers down does not constitute advance warning or scheduled downtime. And no where in the ADVERTISED early access that I PAID FOR, was there a message saying, "Oh BTW you might only get 3 days of the 5 days that you are purchasing a month ahead of time." Again, burying that in a TOS/EULA is not justification for POOR CUSTOMER SERVICE.
Hey folks,
We want you to know that everyone who was part of Early Access will be granted an extended grace period until Sunday at 8AM EDT/12PM GMT before being required to transition your account to live. This will cover those who purchased ESO from an online retailer and won't be getting your box shipped in time and also gives anyone who purchased digitally more Early Access time.
I've been playing since M59 and been in most significant betas since EQ1. You're overgeneralizing and have no clue who this audience is, so please refrain from assuming you know everyone's credentials. I'm embarrassed for you.nerevarine1138 wrote: »I'm pretty sure none of you have played an MMO at launch before (or you're just terrible trolls).
While you are correct, you've completely missed the OP's point. The OP is not complaining about a simple downtime, but repeated downtimes. Overall, I estimate that by the time the game actually launches, in our 5 days of pre-launch we will have seen at least 12 hours of downtime, which is 10% downtime (easily calculated as 12 hours / 5 days). That is horrific by any standard, my friend, launch or not.nerevarine1138 wrote: »MMOs which have been running for years still have maintenance downtime.It's usually worse around launch. We've had 5 days of near-uninterrupted service pre-launch, which is pretty much unheard of. So please, tone down the rhetoric and do your research.