Again, I understand the need for the roll back...but if that is done, why do we need to continue to be locked out of our accounts while they finish their investigation to see if assets were used inappropriately. If the assets are still on the affected account, the roll back would remove them (or restore them.) If the assets were already sent to unaffected accounts, they are currently in game, so continuing the lock out seems excessive. They will still need to go through the accounts, bit by bit, but they could do that while we have access to our accounts.
Just looking for an explanation as to why both are needed to be done simultaneously.
Again, I understand the need for the roll back...but if that is done, why do we need to continue to be locked out of our accounts while they finish their investigation to see if assets were used inappropriately. If the assets are still on the affected account, the roll back would remove them (or restore them.) If the assets were already sent to unaffected accounts, they are currently in game, so continuing the lock out seems excessive. They will still need to go through the accounts, bit by bit, but they could do that while we have access to our accounts.
Just looking for an explanation as to why both are needed to be done simultaneously.
gamergirldk wrote: »mate there have been an influx of billions of gold into the server pp, have been on a rampart spending spree
Again, I understand the need for the roll back...but if that is done, why do we need to continue to be locked out of our accounts while they finish their investigation to see if assets were used inappropriately. If the assets are still on the affected account, the roll back would remove them (or restore them.) If the assets were already sent to unaffected accounts, they are currently in game, so continuing the lock out seems excessive. They will still need to go through the accounts, bit by bit, but they could do that while we have access to our accounts.
Just looking for an explanation as to why both are needed to be done simultaneously.
I would guess the rollbacks aren't finished yet. They are having to do them individually, so it may take the couple of days Gina cited.
Again, I understand the need for the roll back...but if that is done, why do we need to continue to be locked out of our accounts while they finish their investigation to see if assets were used inappropriately. If the assets are still on the affected account, the roll back would remove them (or restore them.) If the assets were already sent to unaffected accounts, they are currently in game, so continuing the lock out seems excessive. They will still need to go through the accounts, bit by bit, but they could do that while we have access to our accounts.
Just looking for an explanation as to why both are needed to be done simultaneously.
why did it effect live server accounts pts is totally separate?