Luke_Flamesword wrote: »And still you are here on ESO forum, playing ESO. This is what I'm talking about. Only for first few weeks we can play new TES so hard that we will not have time for ESO, but later it will be more casual playing.I don't know, but there are still a lot of people playing Skyrim, and it just got an update 13 years after release....
Cooperharley wrote: »ClowdyAllDay wrote: »Cooperharley wrote: »Nah for a variety of reasons:
1) Lots of the map still left to explore & plenty of planes of oblivion ($$$$)
2) Many players, including myself, wouldn't want to lose all of the progress & purchases
3) BGS & ZOS are not going to spend money developing ESO 2 with another MMO in the works (space-related) and ES6
4) Engine improvements and updates would go a long way and satisfy many people in your boat/sphere of thought - currently last gen consoles & low tier PCs are holding back revolutionary upgrades; once a sizeable portion of the playerbase has shown sufficient playtime on the new consoles, I believe we'll drop support and move forward finally
5) If ZOS dropped support for ESO, I'm sure many would find other MMOs and not necessarily go towards ESO 2, but that's subjective
you're gonna have to give evidence to convince me that older graphics machines hold back performance. I am def of the mindset that trying to satisfy the demands of new pc master race hardware is what drives performance down because newer machine owners what to feel like the money they spent gives them a better experience and this pressures game devs to use that increased performance and the poor servers just cant keep up with the demand. I'm of the opinion that a game designed for a ps4 would outperform on the same server hardware and a game that was designed for a ps6 would underperform on that same server hardware.
ZOS has said on several occasions - I'll let you look them up if you're fairly interested - that the reason we haven't had textures/animation updates or things of the sort is due to memory constraints with last generation consoles. If you look at the size of the updates for a new DLC or chapter on a PS4/Xbox1 vs a PS5/XboxX, you can see a massive GB difference in sizing just off the rip there.
Saying that a PS6 would underperform on a game optimized for PS4 is (I think/hope) you joking? Are you saying that PS5 essentially is going to run less efficiently than a PS4? I'm so confused by your argument.
With ES6 coming out in a couple of years, there is no way they would invest in another Elder Scrolls MMO.
It is my theory that ESO is part of the reason that TES6 is taking so long. ESO is a cash cow for them, so why would they cannibalize it with another TES game. Once TES6 launches, population in ESO will take s pretty good hit. In guessing TES6 somewhere around 2030.
That could you add in ESO 2 who is not in current game?DMuehlhausen wrote: »It won't happen. Why would you take away what is making you money?
EQ neer should have done it either, but I think they did cause the were 1 worried about losing to WoW, but also the tech was changing so much, but at this point EQ 1 is still going strong and is celebrating 25 years with 2 expansions this year.
WitchyKiki wrote: »Nope, I like ESO as it is. ESO could get a graphics update and support PC more, instead of console. Some updates could just be exclusive to PC. I would love to see an overhaul just as Runescape has overhauled its game over and over. But a whole new game? Nah. I love the formula for ESO, every expansion adds some new mechanic, a whole zone and more TES lore. I am fine with that and could continue to play ESO for years to come.
With ES6 coming out in a couple of years, there is no way they would invest in another Elder Scrolls MMO.
It is my theory that ESO is part of the reason that TES6 is taking so long. ESO is a cash cow for them, so why would they cannibalize it with another TES game. Once TES6 launches, population in ESO will take s pretty good hit. In guessing TES6 somewhere around 2030.
If it’s being developed by the right people it would be a good idea imo.
Developed by the same people? Forget it, no point.
You’ve seen how the current group have dealt with PVP. In TEN years of development, it’s gotten worse. PVP being such a huge element of any game in the gaming world just out of depth for the current group to deal with.
Would not want a whole new game with the same PVP and combat balance yo-yo issues we have now.
ClowdyAllDay wrote: »Change is inevitable and with computer games more emphasis is placed on graphics and sounds than on story and lore. flashy flash flash brings the yonger crowds which franchises need.