To make sense of this, one needs to know whether a player was "banned" or merely "suspended". The former term is much misused in situations where only a temporary suspension was applied.
To make sense of this, one needs to know whether a player was "banned" or merely "suspended". The former term is much misused in situations where only a temporary suspension was applied.
This game is 10 years old. If someone was banned 8 years ago, I would imagine that they could probably appeal it, if they really wanted to. Depending on what they did, they might be able to get back in.
To make sense of this, one needs to know whether a player was "banned" or merely "suspended". The former term is much misused in situations where only a temporary suspension was applied.
spartaxoxo wrote: »To make sense of this, one needs to know whether a player was "banned" or merely "suspended". The former term is much misused in situations where only a temporary suspension was applied.
Banned doesn't just mean permanent. If the ban was lifted, then the user in question likely was temporarily banned.
dragonlord500 wrote: »I'm a little shock to see this topic. according to Zenimax's terms of service they will never tolerate cheating of any kind and yet this topic is about these cheaters returning. I very much wonder how many innocent players have truly been perma banned over a minor rule breaking action they committed.
SeaGtGruff wrote: »dragonlord500 wrote: »I'm a little shock to see this topic. according to Zenimax's terms of service they will never tolerate cheating of any kind and yet this topic is about these cheaters returning. I very much wonder how many innocent players have truly been perma banned over a minor rule breaking action they committed.
Correction-- "suspected cheaters" and "alleged cheaters." .
alternatelder wrote: »There was/(probably still is?) a guy on PS that would always seemingly sign on just to say a racist slur, same thing every single time, and then sign out. It went on for years at least a few times a month. That made me realize they just don't believe in perma banning. Even the great parade through Belkarth (IYKYK)- those people came back, one still streaming to this day. Stuff like that should get you perma banned, ip banned.
alternatelder wrote: »There was/(probably still is?) a guy on PS that would always seemingly sign on just to say a racist slur, same thing every single time, and then sign out. It went on for years at least a few times a month. That made me realize they just don't believe in perma banning. Even the great parade through Belkarth (IYKYK)- those people came back, one still streaming to this day. Stuff like that should get you perma banned, ip banned.
IP bans serve no purpose as players can get round them, and innocent players find themselves banned because of shared IPs.
To make sense of this, one needs to know whether a player was "banned" or merely "suspended". The former term is much misused in situations where only a temporary suspension was applied.
Four_Fingers wrote: »If they did their time and ZOS lets them back, then that is none of our business.
I don't know what this obsession with being vigilante "game police" in game and on the forums is all about lately.
We should just mind our own business.
Four_Fingers wrote: »If they did their time and ZOS lets them back, then that is none of our business.
I don't know what this obsession with being vigilante "game police" in game and on the forums is all about lately.
We should just mind our own business.