/script JumpToHouse("@Paramedicus")↑↑↑ Feel free to visit my house if you need to use Transmute Station or vet Trial Dummy with buffs and Aetherial Well (look for the Harrowing Reaper on the northern rock wall) ↑↑↑
Paramedicus wrote: »Cannot be done. It would be like saying that you can't play this game how you want.
Paramedicus wrote: »Cannot be done. It would be like saying that you can't play this game how you want.
That ship sailed a long time ago, including for no-proc. They were very transparent about disabling all but 19 fifth-piece bonuses for an entire update in all campaigns and about disabling proc sets in no-CP campaigns going forward; they also tried to be transparent about which proc sets they had recoded to work in no-proc after that. The issue was they gave us a very incomplete list and have never corrected or updated it, exacerbating the friction caused by the restrictions rather than minimizing it. They should want people to know just how many sets work in no-proc now, especially as the in-game text for no-CP campaigns still misleads players into thinking that no proc sets actually do. Currently their information states that no-proc is more restrictive than it is, so it is in their interests to correct that.
Necrotech_Master wrote: »Paramedicus wrote: »Cannot be done. It would be like saying that you can't play this game how you want.
That ship sailed a long time ago, including for no-proc. They were very transparent about disabling all but 19 fifth-piece bonuses for an entire update in all campaigns and about disabling proc sets in no-CP campaigns going forward; they also tried to be transparent about which proc sets they had recoded to work in no-proc after that. The issue was they gave us a very incomplete list and have never corrected or updated it, exacerbating the friction caused by the restrictions rather than minimizing it. They should want people to know just how many sets work in no-proc now, especially as the in-game text for no-CP campaigns still misleads players into thinking that no proc sets actually do. Currently their information states that no-proc is more restrictive than it is, so it is in their interests to correct that.
to go along with this, every time new sets are added there is no mention if they should or should not work in no proc, because sometimes they are not obvious if they should be considered a proc or not
Jamie_Aubrey wrote: »I need an updated list on what counts as a proc, like
is somehow a proc set but has 0 procs, all you need is to have a pet active
Paramedicus wrote: »Cannot be done. It would be like saying that you can't play this game how you want.