MilkAndC00kies wrote: »
@opalcity beat me to it. Thanks for sharing that text.
@MilkAndC00kies your friend will need to submit an appeal for this and go through the formal process. If they have already appealed, they can send the ticket number over to me and I can make sure it's in the right place to be handled. But final call on these matters is always held with customer service.
@opalcity beat me to it. Thanks for sharing that text.
@MilkAndC00kies your friend will need to submit an appeal for this and go through the formal process. If they have already appealed, they can send the ticket number over to me and I can make sure it's in the right place to be handled. But final call on these matters is always held with customer service.
alternatelder wrote: »"Did in-fact violate tos..." They don't perma ban without actual proof, just saying. Also, why is he basically admitting to doing it, but you're saying it was only a joke?
alternatelder wrote: »"Did in-fact violate tos..." They don't perma ban without actual proof, just saying. Also, why is he basically admitting to doing it, but you're saying it was only a joke?
the "joke" is that he was "selling gold for litecoin"
selling gold is permabannable
he can appeal, telling them it was in fact a joke and saying he'll never do it again
his appeal may be accepted or punishment reduced, if he does it again the result will be the same but his appeal will probably not get accepted
RealLoveBVB wrote: »[snip]
[snip]
alternatelder wrote: »alternatelder wrote: »"Did in-fact violate tos..." They don't perma ban without actual proof, just saying. Also, why is he basically admitting to doing it, but you're saying it was only a joke?
the "joke" is that he was "selling gold for litecoin"
selling gold is permabannable
he can appeal, telling them it was in fact a joke and saying he'll never do it again
his appeal may be accepted or punishment reduced, if he does it again the result will be the same but his appeal will probably not get accepted
Yeah, I know the joke (where there is no proof that's what he said) and that gold selling is bannable. But in the reply he isn't even saying he is joking...Not to mention, again, that they see proof of his guilt and keep the ban.
alternatelder wrote: »"Did in-fact violate tos..." They don't perma ban without actual proof, just saying. Also, why is he basically admitting to doing it, but you're saying it was only a joke?
MilkAndC00kies wrote: »alternatelder wrote: »"Did in-fact violate tos..." They don't perma ban without actual proof, just saying. Also, why is he basically admitting to doing it, but you're saying it was only a joke?
First of all his enlish is bad, just as mine secondly he admit he did said that in chat.
MilkAndC00kies wrote: »alternatelder wrote: »"Did in-fact violate tos..." They don't perma ban without actual proof, just saying. Also, why is he basically admitting to doing it, but you're saying it was only a joke?
First of all his enlish is bad, just as mine secondly he admit he did said that in chat.
I would recommend they attempt to write out their entire appeal in their primary language (which I assume is Hungarian) then use a translator to English.
They also provide support in French, German, Russian, Simplified Chinese, and Spanish as well as Japanese (but if people appeal in Japanese they use a different support link)