Finedaible wrote: »
I'd give ES:VI at least 10 years away. I sense that Todd Howard either doesn't want to work on it right now or he simply can't while they work on Starfield.
Hammerfell is boring. Like sand in your bikini at the beach-level of boring. Like getting stung by a jelly fish and waiting for someone at the health clinic on the boardwalk to sprinkle some vineagar on your arm-level of boring.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Since ES 6 appears to take place in the Redguard area, I doubt Hammerfell will be an ingame location for some time.
Skyrim started being made while ESO was still being developed, yet we have Skyrim. No reason Hammerfell could appear more (it already appear a bit in ESO) just because ES6 has the rumour of having some Hammerfell.
I don’t know what this proves.
Skyrim was released in 2011.
Eso was released in 2014.
Hammerfell in eso is NOT going to be released before es 6 does theirs. It does not make sense. The stand alone es games have a much bigger audience than the mmo does. And the stand alone games are not going to have their hype interfered with by the mmo.
There may be a release in eso to support the es6 game, a form of in game advertising for it. But the stand alone game will come first.
BloodyStigmata wrote: »There are so many empty spots on the Tamriel map right now and we're already 8 years into the game.
If we get another chapter in another dreary undead or daedric place like the soul-cairn or Oblivion and not in fetching Tamriel, I'm going to eat one of my guar.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Also ES6 is a long way ahead. Avoiding Hammerfell, the province with least content, for 6 chapters or more is unlikely to happen.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Since ES 6 appears to take place in the Redguard area, I doubt Hammerfell will be an ingame location for some time.
Skyrim started being made while ESO was still being developed, yet we have Skyrim. No reason Hammerfell could appear more (it already appear a bit in ESO) just because ES6 has the rumour of having some Hammerfell.
I don’t know what this proves.
Skyrim was released in 2011.
Eso was released in 2014.
Hammerfell in eso is NOT going to be released before es 6 does theirs. It does not make sense. The stand alone es games have a much bigger audience than the mmo does. And the stand alone games are not going to have their hype interfered with by the mmo.
There may be a release in eso to support the es6 game, a form of in game advertising for it. But the stand alone game will come first.
ESO's development begun before Skyrim. Skyrim was done and released faster. So one singleplayer containing a certain area is unlikely to hinder the same area appearing in ESO. They do communicate with eachother.
Also ES6 is a long way ahead. Avoiding Hammerfell, the province with least content, for 6 chapters or more is unlikely to happen.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Since ES 6 appears to take place in the Redguard area, I doubt Hammerfell will be an ingame location for some time.
Skyrim started being made while ESO was still being developed, yet we have Skyrim. No reason Hammerfell could appear more (it already appear a bit in ESO) just because ES6 has the rumour of having some Hammerfell.
I don’t know what this proves.
Skyrim was released in 2011.
Eso was released in 2014.
CNotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Since ES 6 appears to take place in the Redguard area, I doubt Hammerfell will be an ingame location for some time.
Skyrim started being made while ESO was still being developed, yet we have Skyrim. No reason Hammerfell could appear more (it already appear a bit in ESO) just because ES6 has the rumour of having some Hammerfell.
I don’t know what this proves.
Skyrim was released in 2011.
Eso was released in 2014.
Hammerfell in eso is NOT going to be released before es 6 does theirs. It does not make sense. The stand alone es games have a much bigger audience than the mmo does. And the stand alone games are not going to have their hype interfered with by the mmo.
There may be a release in eso to support the es6 game, a form of in game advertising for it. But the stand alone game will come first.
ESO's development begun before Skyrim. Skyrim was done and released faster. So one singleplayer containing a certain area is unlikely to hinder the same area appearing in ESO. They do communicate with eachother.
Also ES6 is a long way ahead. Avoiding Hammerfell, the province with least content, for 6 chapters or more is unlikely to happen.
Look I get it. You really want hammerfell to happen, but if ES 6 is located there, eso cannot touch it until Bethesda are finished with the game. Do you understand?
How the zone looks, the architecture of the area, how the towns are placed, what creatures roam the area… All of it is dictated by the stand alone games. Bethesda is the 400 pound gorilla, they call the shots.
The mmo cannot take the lead. You are talking about a game (ES 6) that could cost hundreds of millions of dollars to make vs eso’s development team which is much smaller. They are not going to allow eso to dictate the lore to ES 6. It’s going to be the reverse.
Eso cannot make hammerfell, until ES 6 (if ES 6 takes place there) is much farther along in development. Not until places and designs are more concrete. Then the eso team can start working on it.
Even then ES 6 will be released first. It would be the equivalent of ABC (which is owned by Disney) wanting to do a live prime time Fantastic Four tv show, before the marvel movie company comes out with theirs. It will just not be permitted.
Look I get it. You really want hammerfell to happen, but if ES 6 is located there, eso cannot touch it until Bethesda are finished with the game. Do you understand?
Again, but this has already been done with Skyrim. Skyrim was developed in ESO before Skyrim. Clearly this is not an issue.How the zone looks, the architecture of the area, how the towns are placed, what creatures roam the area… All of it is dictated by the stand alone games. Bethesda is the 400 pound gorilla, they call the shots.
Ah yes, because ESO doesn't cost millions either and hasn't stood for most of the lore added to Elder Scrolls for years now. Wait, it has.The mmo cannot take the lead. You are talking about a game (ES 6) that could cost hundreds of millions of dollars to make vs eso’s development team which is much smaller. They are not going to allow eso to dictate the lore to ES 6. It’s going to be the reverse.
We have no idea how far they are, we have no idea if it actually will have Hammerfell, we know they communicate they have told us so and on it goes.Eso cannot make hammerfell, until ES 6 (if ES 6 takes place there) is much farther along in development. Not until places and designs are more concrete. Then the eso team can start working on it.
James-Wayne wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Since ES 6 appears to take place in the Redguard area, I doubt Hammerfell will be an ingame location for some time.
Skyrim started being made while ESO was still being developed, yet we have Skyrim. No reason Hammerfell could appear more (it already appear a bit in ESO) just because ES6 has the rumour of having some Hammerfell.
I don’t know what this proves.
Skyrim was released in 2011.
Eso was released in 2014.
They were working on ESO 7 years prior to the 2014 launch.
James-Wayne wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Since ES 6 appears to take place in the Redguard area, I doubt Hammerfell will be an ingame location for some time.
Skyrim started being made while ESO was still being developed, yet we have Skyrim. No reason Hammerfell could appear more (it already appear a bit in ESO) just because ES6 has the rumour of having some Hammerfell.
I don’t know what this proves.
Skyrim was released in 2011.
Eso was released in 2014.
They were working on ESO 7 years prior to the 2014 launch.
And on day 1 they designed Skyrim?
Before the engine was built?
Look we already know that Todd Howard can make eso not work on certain chapter ideas. (Edit: one link among many: https://www.pcgamesn.com/the-elder-scrolls-online/dwemer ) He had veto power and he has exorcised that power. That means the power of what eso can do largely rests with him.
It makes zero sense to allow eso to take the lead on developing hammerfell. He will want to do it (if ES 6 is placed there).
SilverIce58 wrote: »James-Wayne wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Since ES 6 appears to take place in the Redguard area, I doubt Hammerfell will be an ingame location for some time.
Skyrim started being made while ESO was still being developed, yet we have Skyrim. No reason Hammerfell could appear more (it already appear a bit in ESO) just because ES6 has the rumour of having some Hammerfell.
I don’t know what this proves.
Skyrim was released in 2011.
Eso was released in 2014.
They were working on ESO 7 years prior to the 2014 launch.
And on day 1 they designed Skyrim?
Before the engine was built?
Look we already know that Todd Howard can make eso not work on certain chapter ideas. (Edit: one link among many: https://www.pcgamesn.com/the-elder-scrolls-online/dwemer ) He had veto power and he has exorcised that power. That means the power of what eso can do largely rests with him.
It makes zero sense to allow eso to take the lead on developing hammerfell. He will want to do it (if ES 6 is placed there).
Oh please. That was about the Dwemer, which is a race shrouded in mystery. Thats not at all comparable to Redguards/Hammerfell.
"Todd said no dwemer so ESO cant make Hammerfell" is not the point you think it is. And you haven't even addressed how much of Hammerfell is already in the game, let alone the amount of Reguard lore we gained from each zone. If ESO couldn't take the lead on adding new zones and new lore, then why do we have all the lore and zones we have now? Oh thats right because this game takes place almost a thousand years before Skyrim. They can easily change the lore to fit whatever they need if they were to make a game in Hammerfell.
SilverIce58 wrote: »Except ESO already made Hammerfell, so your point is moot. Several zones are already in the game, Alik'r Desert, Bangkorai, Craglorn, and Hew's Bane. What's 2 more?
I'd prefer Telvanni Peninsula over Hammerfell. I hope however that this time they'll make Telvanni towers right, as in mushroom trees, and not stone towers with cancer.
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »
I'd prefer Telvanni Peninsula over Hammerfell. I hope however that this time they'll make Telvanni towers right, as in mushroom trees, and not stone towers with cancer.
And honestly do you really think there will be two DC centric chapters in a row?