I am seeing the very same price for ESO+ and crowns as they have been since I started over a year ago. 14.99 USD for a month, 11.99/m for a year-long sub. Crowns are still the same price as well across all the packages.
What is likely being seen is adjustments for foreign exchange rates.
markulrich1966 wrote: »Reason is, that TR has 80% inflation.
Knockmaker wrote: »Prices on eso steam store went crazy. I mean, I understand that it has to do with the currency exchanges and all, but that is partly why the steam regional pricing exists to ensure players from all over the world can afford. I can understand the increase, but 3X increase for eso+ sub? Similar increase had been done with the crowns that was when I stopped paying for crowns. Now, I will probably never resub either.
It takes years to upgrade servers but the store prices keep changing almost instantly nowadays. I believe people behind it make their own analyses etc. therefore I kindly request them to not analyse fx changes only but also PPP. That decision is sure to prevent a lot of players in my market (TR) at least from subbing. I for one am a certain drop from your statistics. I hope zos' steam team reviews this new price tags.
Yes, it is plain truth that the exchange rates have moved significantly in that exchange pair, but that doesn't mean all these players have their incomes increased 3X.
So, for your country are prices higher than on eso store? Or how?
My country had cheaper month sub on steam than on eso store.
When prices started be tje same I moved to eso store only.
I have been subscribed to eso+ since late 2016, but since 2016 they didn't upgrade their server, people have been telling them Cyrodiil is unplayable due to lag however they refused to upgrade servers and instead they tried adding cooldowns to skills, slowing down combat, changing damage over time, they tried every single cheap option and failed.
If I was sure they would use the money I pay and upgrade my player experience I would resub, but this is just shameless, they provide 0 hardware upgrade and then they increase the price by 3x. I'll cancel my eso+ after almost 6 years and I'm not planning on resubbing until they fix their servers.
Most of my guilds are moving to ff14 anyway over the terrible u35 and as if this terrible patch and their unprofessional attitude towards feedback is not enough to quit the game they just increased prices by 3x, it almost feels like they want to kill the game since microsoft bought them.
psychotrip wrote: »Knockmaker wrote: »Prices on eso steam store went crazy. I mean, I understand that it has to do with the currency exchanges and all, but that is partly why the steam regional pricing exists to ensure players from all over the world can afford. I can understand the increase, but 3X increase for eso+ sub? Similar increase had been done with the crowns that was when I stopped paying for crowns. Now, I will probably never resub either.
It takes years to upgrade servers but the store prices keep changing almost instantly nowadays. I believe people behind it make their own analyses etc. therefore I kindly request them to not analyse fx changes only but also PPP. That decision is sure to prevent a lot of players in my market (TR) at least from subbing. I for one am a certain drop from your statistics. I hope zos' steam team reviews this new price tags.
Your discontent has already been factored in, my friend. [snip]Yes, it is plain truth that the exchange rates have moved significantly in that exchange pair, but that doesn't mean all these players have their incomes increased 3X.
[snip] They think enough people will buy in for them to make a profit. This is purely business, [snip]
Knockmaker wrote: »So, for your country are prices higher than on eso store? Or how?
My country had cheaper month sub on steam than on eso store.
When prices started be tje same I moved to eso store only.
No, I am referring to the disproportionate price hikes of eso crown and sub prices in a specific (TR) region on eso's steam store. I haven't really checked what the prices are on eso website atm. I'll just leave a few examples:
For a person who earns minimum wage (FYI, approximately 50% of the workforce here is getting paid a minimum wage, so the perception of "minimum wage" may be a little different. It isn't like 2% of the workforce is paid a minimum wage like in some other regions in the world. That's why I mentioned this official stats), a 21k crown pack on the steam store now costs approximately 1/4 of their monthly income. With a minimum wage in Germany, for example, you can now afford slightly over 100x 1-month sub, whereas you can only afford 42x 1-month sub.
Yes, you can always argue that why should they keep their prices lower in this market etc. and all that wouldn't be completely incorrect at some point. However, it will be them losing profit in the end as well when the people will realise it is way too expensive now and will need to stop paying for it. That's why PPP matters. This was just a basic example with only a few figures I could provide on top of my head with a few simple calculations. If other players in the same regions with better knowledge and math see this, maybe they can diversify the examples. I am simply saying that that is disproportionate and needs to be reconsidered and revised.
Eh, not really.
If a territory's currency is devalued to a point to not really be profitable to maintain the current pricing, then they really aren't losing money if they raise the price and some people can no longer afford it any more. If they don't raise the price, then all they are doing is taking a loss due to the currency's value being poor.
And honestly, the cost of living and minimum wage stuff is really irrelevant here. We are talking about a luxury/entertainment item. It isn't a necessary thing to have or pay for. So taking any of that into consideration is pretty irrelevant. The only important thing is the value of the currency and the return on the investment in that territory. If that means tripling prices, that is more indicative to the state of the region than it is to the company selling a product.
Knockmaker wrote: »psychotrip wrote: »Knockmaker wrote: »Prices on eso steam store went crazy. I mean, I understand that it has to do with the currency exchanges and all, but that is partly why the steam regional pricing exists to ensure players from all over the world can afford. I can understand the increase, but 3X increase for eso+ sub? Similar increase had been done with the crowns that was when I stopped paying for crowns. Now, I will probably never resub either.
It takes years to upgrade servers but the store prices keep changing almost instantly nowadays. I believe people behind it make their own analyses etc. therefore I kindly request them to not analyse fx changes only but also PPP. That decision is sure to prevent a lot of players in my market (TR) at least from subbing. I for one am a certain drop from your statistics. I hope zos' steam team reviews this new price tags.
Your discontent has already been factored in, my friend. [snip]Yes, it is plain truth that the exchange rates have moved significantly in that exchange pair, but that doesn't mean all these players have their incomes increased 3X.
[snip] They think enough people will buy in for them to make a profit. This is purely business, [snip]
Yep, I could imagine that a business approach should be amoral, and I can understand that. That's why I've just tried my best in my previous post to explain how unaffordable these purchases are likely to become and might even lose them money ultimately. If they are going to compensate for it elsewhere in another market, fine. But, I also keep seeing localised ads of eso in my region which indicates that they are trying to attract more customers from here as well, which makes this hike quite contradictory to that.
psychotrip wrote: »Knockmaker wrote: »psychotrip wrote: »Knockmaker wrote: »Prices on eso steam store went crazy. I mean, I understand that it has to do with the currency exchanges and all, but that is partly why the steam regional pricing exists to ensure players from all over the world can afford. I can understand the increase, but 3X increase for eso+ sub? Similar increase had been done with the crowns that was when I stopped paying for crowns. Now, I will probably never resub either.
It takes years to upgrade servers but the store prices keep changing almost instantly nowadays. I believe people behind it make their own analyses etc. therefore I kindly request them to not analyse fx changes only but also PPP. That decision is sure to prevent a lot of players in my market (TR) at least from subbing. I for one am a certain drop from your statistics. I hope zos' steam team reviews this new price tags.
Your discontent has already been factored in, my friend. [snip]Yes, it is plain truth that the exchange rates have moved significantly in that exchange pair, but that doesn't mean all these players have their incomes increased 3X.
[snip] They think enough people will buy in for them to make a profit. This is purely business, [snip]
Yep, I could imagine that a business approach should be amoral, and I can understand that. That's why I've just tried my best in my previous post to explain how unaffordable these purchases are likely to become and might even lose them money ultimately. If they are going to compensate for it elsewhere in another market, fine. But, I also keep seeing localised ads of eso in my region which indicates that they are trying to attract more customers from here as well, which makes this hike quite contradictory to that.
This will go one of two ways:
[snip]
I say this from experience. I dont say this stuff to be a downer, but we need to understand how these companies work if we're going to affect any kind of real change. By and large, forums are meaningless for feedback, and thats especially true for monetary feedback. The people in charge of that sort of thing have likely never even been to these forums, and they're already aware that some will quit over this. [snip]
Knockmaker wrote: »I am seeing the very same price for ESO+ and crowns as they have been since I started over a year ago. 14.99 USD for a month, 11.99/m for a year-long sub. Crowns are still the same price as well across all the packages.
What is likely being seen is adjustments for foreign exchange rates.
Most likely. But like I said, that change doesn't correlate with PPP. AFAIK, Steam makes only recommendations as to pricing of a product on their platform. But the actual studios make the final decision. If so, zos steam team must also include PPP in their calculations for their own revenues sake as well. Yes, it is plain truth that the exchange rates have moved significantly in that exchange pair, but that doesn't mean all these players have their incomes increased 3X. Therefore, when you look at the new figures that appear on their steam store, they just seem almost too unreal for an "in-app purchase" or monthly subscription.
Knockmaker wrote: »I am seeing the very same price for ESO+ and crowns as they have been since I started over a year ago. 14.99 USD for a month, 11.99/m for a year-long sub. Crowns are still the same price as well across all the packages.
What is likely being seen is adjustments for foreign exchange rates.
Most likely. But like I said, that change doesn't correlate with PPP. AFAIK, Steam makes only recommendations as to pricing of a product on their platform. But the actual studios make the final decision. If so, zos steam team must also include PPP in their calculations for their own revenues sake as well. Yes, it is plain truth that the exchange rates have moved significantly in that exchange pair, but that doesn't mean all these players have their incomes increased 3X. Therefore, when you look at the new figures that appear on their steam store, they just seem almost too unreal for an "in-app purchase" or monthly subscription.
I did a search and did not find that Steam requires developers to provide PPP when increasing prices based on price forex. Since the pricing is solely on the developer's side, it seems it is none of Steam's business to start with.
However, if you truly feel that Steam has such a requirement, then your beef is with Steam for letting Zenimax slide without providing justification. You could also start a support ticket with Zenimax in case the change was in error.
Good luck.
Knockmaker wrote: »markulrich1966 wrote: »Reason is, that TR has 80% inflation.
There is no denying that. However, 80% isn't 3X increase. This looks like front loading and it just isn't right.
Knockmaker wrote: »Knockmaker wrote: »I am seeing the very same price for ESO+ and crowns as they have been since I started over a year ago. 14.99 USD for a month, 11.99/m for a year-long sub. Crowns are still the same price as well across all the packages.
What is likely being seen is adjustments for foreign exchange rates.
Most likely. But like I said, that change doesn't correlate with PPP. AFAIK, Steam makes only recommendations as to pricing of a product on their platform. But the actual studios make the final decision. If so, zos steam team must also include PPP in their calculations for their own revenues sake as well. Yes, it is plain truth that the exchange rates have moved significantly in that exchange pair, but that doesn't mean all these players have their incomes increased 3X. Therefore, when you look at the new figures that appear on their steam store, they just seem almost too unreal for an "in-app purchase" or monthly subscription.
I did a search and did not find that Steam requires developers to provide PPP when increasing prices based on price forex. Since the pricing is solely on the developer's side, it seems it is none of Steam's business to start with.
However, if you truly feel that Steam has such a requirement, then your beef is with Steam for letting Zenimax slide without providing justification. You could also start a support ticket with Zenimax in case the change was in error.
Good luck.
But I wasn't saying such a thing.
I said zos should include/consider PPP in their calculations for more accuracy.
FeedbackOnly wrote: »Knockmaker wrote: »markulrich1966 wrote: »Reason is, that TR has 80% inflation.
There is no denying that. However, 80% isn't 3X increase. This looks like front loading and it just isn't right.
It used to be 200 to 1 not even two years ago. It's 1800 to 1 now
FeedbackOnly wrote: »Knockmaker wrote: »markulrich1966 wrote: »Reason is, that TR has 80% inflation.
There is no denying that. However, 80% isn't 3X increase. This looks like front loading and it just isn't right.
It used to be 200 to 1 not even two years ago. It's 1800 to 1 now
Curious... are the "crown sellers" that are desperatly trying to high the ratio from specific regions? I'm beginning to think its likely.