Those were a lot of work and not everyone can do em.
newtinmpls wrote: »forced account wide achievements
Funny thing, I've got Flawless Conquerer and Spirit Slayer on my Stamblade. I wasn't able to do any of that on my Magsorc, haha.Dragonnord wrote: »That a player can get the title with his/her one bar heavy attack easy mode magsorc doesn't mean he/she can do a flawless run with his/her stamina nightblade.
Dragonnord wrote: »
Why am I under the impression that all whiners about AWA are the same as the ones asking AWA from @ZOS before? And no matter what they will have some bad comments?
Like omg why do I have to grind all that on 16 chars? (u don't btw)
then OMG AWA ruining the game , now what do i do? All player will have Flawless and spirit slayer! Nope, they will be the same ( i have them btw and i dont mind)
vesselwiththepestle wrote: »Funny thing, I've got Flawless Conquerer and Spirit Slayer on my Stamblade. I wasn't able to do any of that on my Magsorc, haha.Dragonnord wrote: »That a player can get the title with his/her one bar heavy attack easy mode magsorc doesn't mean he/she can do a flawless run with his/her stamina nightblade.
RisenEclipse wrote: »imo Maelstrom is mostly mechanic based. You gotta know how to maneuver your character around the arena, dodge at the right instance, do this mechanic at the right time. To me that is more the player's achievement, and less the character's. Each character has to do those things, and that is based on the player's skill to see the mechanics and maneuver around them. So seeing someone have the title will only make me think that they knew what they were doing in the arena. Not if that character "earned" it.
kringled_1 wrote: »RisenEclipse wrote: »imo Maelstrom is mostly mechanic based. You gotta know how to maneuver your character around the arena, dodge at the right instance, do this mechanic at the right time. To me that is more the player's achievement, and less the character's. Each character has to do those things, and that is based on the player's skill to see the mechanics and maneuver around them. So seeing someone have the title will only make me think that they knew what they were doing in the arena. Not if that character "earned" it.
While it's mostly mechanics based, different builds will encounter different difficulties. For me, the main failure point on melee builds was in the vault of umbrage, since archers are perfectly happy to sit in the bloom radius of a flower which is very risky when a venom caller appears.
Secondary moments were the trolls in the rink of frozen blood, and abilities that will unintentionally kill menders when they put the shield up. So the difference between having it on one character and another is meaningful to me, and my last character to get flawless was my first to get spirit slayer. I'm not super upset about the title changes but it's not always as simple as "the player did it on one character so of course they could do it on anything".
kringled_1 wrote: »RisenEclipse wrote: »imo Maelstrom is mostly mechanic based. You gotta know how to maneuver your character around the arena, dodge at the right instance, do this mechanic at the right time. To me that is more the player's achievement, and less the character's. Each character has to do those things, and that is based on the player's skill to see the mechanics and maneuver around them. So seeing someone have the title will only make me think that they knew what they were doing in the arena. Not if that character "earned" it.
While it's mostly mechanics based, different builds will encounter different difficulties. For me, the main failure point on melee builds was in the vault of umbrage, since archers are perfectly happy to sit in the bloom radius of a flower which is very risky when a venom caller appears.
Secondary moments were the trolls in the rink of frozen blood, and abilities that will unintentionally kill menders when they put the shield up. So the difference between having it on one character and another is meaningful to me, and my last character to get flawless was my first to get spirit slayer. I'm not super upset about the title changes but it's not always as simple as "the player did it on one character so of course they could do it on anything".
It is not going to automatically label all your characters as Flawless Conqueror. It is an option that you have and you can use it as you see fit.
kringled_1 wrote: »RisenEclipse wrote: »imo Maelstrom is mostly mechanic based. You gotta know how to maneuver your character around the arena, dodge at the right instance, do this mechanic at the right time. To me that is more the player's achievement, and less the character's. Each character has to do those things, and that is based on the player's skill to see the mechanics and maneuver around them. So seeing someone have the title will only make me think that they knew what they were doing in the arena. Not if that character "earned" it.
While it's mostly mechanics based, different builds will encounter different difficulties. For me, the main failure point on melee builds was in the vault of umbrage, since archers are perfectly happy to sit in the bloom radius of a flower which is very risky when a venom caller appears.
Secondary moments were the trolls in the rink of frozen blood, and abilities that will unintentionally kill menders when they put the shield up. So the difference between having it on one character and another is meaningful to me, and my last character to get flawless was my first to get spirit slayer. I'm not super upset about the title changes but it's not always as simple as "the player did it on one character so of course they could do it on anything".
Why am I under the impression that all whiners about AWA are the same as the ones asking AWA from @ZOS before? And no matter what they will have some bad comments?
Like omg why do I have to grind all that on 16 chars? (u don't btw)
then OMG AWA ruining the game , now what do i do? All player will have Flawless and spirit slayer! Nope, they will be the same ( i have them btw and i dont mind)
RisenEclipse wrote: »kringled_1 wrote: »RisenEclipse wrote: »imo Maelstrom is mostly mechanic based. You gotta know how to maneuver your character around the arena, dodge at the right instance, do this mechanic at the right time. To me that is more the player's achievement, and less the character's. Each character has to do those things, and that is based on the player's skill to see the mechanics and maneuver around them. So seeing someone have the title will only make me think that they knew what they were doing in the arena. Not if that character "earned" it.
While it's mostly mechanics based, different builds will encounter different difficulties. For me, the main failure point on melee builds was in the vault of umbrage, since archers are perfectly happy to sit in the bloom radius of a flower which is very risky when a venom caller appears.
Secondary moments were the trolls in the rink of frozen blood, and abilities that will unintentionally kill menders when they put the shield up. So the difference between having it on one character and another is meaningful to me, and my last character to get flawless was my first to get spirit slayer. I'm not super upset about the title changes but it's not always as simple as "the player did it on one character so of course they could do it on anything".
I was more or less talking about viewing OTHER players who have the title. You know which character of your own has earned it, and which doesn't. So just throw it on a character that you feel comfortable using it with. But im not going to sit and stress over if that so and so earned that title on the character he is using it for. That player earned it in a very mechanic heavy arena. That player KNOWS what to do in my mind. Sure they might not have gotten the hang of it on every character. But that doesn't change the fact that they as the player still earned that achievement. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Dragonnord wrote: »Yes, my "Carry My Items" alt that never wielded a sword, in fact I think he hasn't even ever moved yet in the game, remains always in front of the banker, will have the title.