I don't want to be that guy but it's most likely a bug or a mistake. They would've announced such a sought-after change. I hope I'm wrong, of course, because while I think the limit should be doubled at the very least given the gargantuan size of many houses (many of the biggest in the whole game have been released in the Blackwood chapter at that), 1000 would still be better than 700.
Well, if it was QA, it means there's a possibility that the limit will be increased, and I'd be glad to be wrong because that'd mean we'd get more slots, so again - I'd be happy to be wrong.I don't want to be that guy but it's most likely a bug or a mistake. They would've announced such a sought-after change. I hope I'm wrong, of course, because while I think the limit should be doubled at the very least given the gargantuan size of many houses (many of the biggest in the whole game have been released in the Blackwood chapter at that), 1000 would still be better than 700.
Possibly. It could also be that QA was on PTS running some tests on housing limits that exceed the current Live limits.
QA apparently uses PTS for testing, too.
Well, if it was QA, it means there's a possibility that the limit will be increased, and I'd be glad to be wrong because that'd mean we'd get more slots, so again - I'd be happy to be wrong.I don't want to be that guy but it's most likely a bug or a mistake. They would've announced such a sought-after change. I hope I'm wrong, of course, because while I think the limit should be doubled at the very least given the gargantuan size of many houses (many of the biggest in the whole game have been released in the Blackwood chapter at that), 1000 would still be better than 700.
Possibly. It could also be that QA was on PTS running some tests on housing limits that exceed the current Live limits.
QA apparently uses PTS for testing, too.