No Proc is not better, it’s a statement that there’s something wrong with the game

Adenoma

First off, this isn’t a statement that I think no proc is bad - I prefer it to the current meta of proc/CP enabled cyrodiil. We’ve seen countless iterations of cyrodiil at this point and the fact that we now have a regressive trend where people are favoring a move backwards in ESO combat means that our moves forwards have had a negative impact on the game.

We’ve moved from metas where engine guardian/blood spawn were the most present proc options through multiple proc metas. We’ve introduced mythic sets and numerous arena/monster sets. We’ve had constant revisions and homogenization of our base game classes and additions of multiple (full disclosure, I play those) overtuned classes. We’ve moved towards a homogenization and lack of diversity with weapon trees. And for what? Is the game better now?

ZOS lacks a unified vision of PvP combat and it seems reasonable to point out these deficiencies. I started playing probably 6-7 years ago and I miss the days where the player base’s biggest complaint was just performance and AOE caps.

Fawn4287

>Make irrelevant dungeon DLC hardly anyone wants.
>Introduce game breaking PvP sets to help move the DLC.
>move all PvP forum concerns focus on terrible new set design, ignoring unplayable lag.
>Nerf game breaking sets introduced in the last DLC, whilst simultaneously bringing in new ones in the new DLC and letting performance get worse.
>Rinse, Repeat.

Bergzorn

Fawn4287 wrote: »

>Introduce game breaking PvP sets to help move the DLC.

Except that this time, access to the DLC is not needed to obtain the new sets. I don't have ESO+ or the DLC, play the no CP no proc campaign exclusively, and still get spammed with the new sets via ROTW.

More cheese for everyone. At least with the no proc option I don't have to eat it.

Bl4ckR3alm93

Its about time that this game starts separately balancing PVE and PVP