Guards on all 3 flags at Cropsford - why?

pleximus

This one is really irritating and I still haven't understood WHY Cropsford has guards on all 3 flags which makes it nigh impossible to capture solo. This compared to the other 2 towns where one of the flags are void of guards which makes solo capture possible. Does someone at ZOS have a preference for Ebonheart or is this a mistake because I hardly think this should be acceptable. Either make all 3 towns have guards on all flags or remove the guards on one of the flags at Cropsford LIKE IT USED TO BE! I remember when there were only guards at 2 of the flags and I have no idea why you changed it to 3.

This is just one of those things that can be fixed easily but causes so much irritation (at least with those of us who have actually tried to take it solo and create a foothold). Pretty please fix it, ZOS?

Pauwer

They do prefer ep. Remember when they coded the mini loading screens allover ep area? Not obvious at all

pleximus

Pauwer wrote: »

They do prefer ep. Remember when they coded the mini loading screens allover ep area? Not obvious at all

I don't remember anything like that but it wouldn't surprise me.

Pauwer

Havy you ever tried to put a camp around ep keeps? Good luck with that, they have op defence terrain as well.

pleximus

Pauwer wrote: »

Havy you ever tried to put a camp around ep keeps? Good luck with that, they have op defence terrain as well.

Drakelowe, Chalman and Farragut are nightmares to siege while DC keeps are the easiest to siege.

Indigogo

Add outposts close to Warden and Black boot, then we can talk about who's the favourite

I wish towns couldn't be captured at all tbh.

I'd agree that all flags should have adds.

Chaos2088

It's because the other two factions have outposts in the same place on their sides of the map.

Guess they couldn't just swap cropsford out for one due to lore and map etc.....so they made it harder to capture. Makes sense so it gives EP the same playing field as DC and AD.