Silence speaks louder than words, right?Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent. The latter results in less drama which means less work. People are angry and irrational as a group.
Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent.
Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent.
Which of these two types of companies do you think will have better customer satisfaction and retention?
Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent.
Which of these two types of companies do you think will have better customer satisfaction and retention?
Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent. The latter results in less drama which means less work. People are angry and irrational as a group.
It wouldn't change a thing. People cry even when there's scheduled maintenance. When they KNOW the servers are going down, people cry that they were JUST doing x, y and/or z.
It's better to say nothing, cause it won't matter.
Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent.
Which of these two types of companies do you think will have better customer satisfaction and retention?
Only like 1% even know the forums exist, these announcements mean nothing.
Oryctolagus wrote: »Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent.
Which of these two types of companies do you think will have better customer satisfaction and retention?
Basically the same, because the people who get angry and loud do so in both cases equally. I'm not even saying that it's right or wrong, mind you, it's just the way it is because of human nature.
Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent.
Which of these two types of companies do you think will have better customer satisfaction and retention?
Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent.
Which of these two types of companies do you think will have better customer satisfaction and retention?
Been here for 5 1/2 years. I'd call that retention.
Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent.
Which of these two types of companies do you think will have better customer satisfaction and retention?
Been here for 5 1/2 years. I'd call that retention.
We all know that even with the problems, ESO is the best mmorpg currently available. Plus it's part of the universally adored TES franchise. So it's an outlier in that sense. And if one thinks that ZOS doesn't take those facts into consideration when making these unpopular decisions, one would be be rather shortsighted and naive.
"I'm sure that if you were more transparent and show more interest to the players, it would ease the spirits, just details of what is happening with a better assessment of the duration of these, it is perhaps better to be pessimistic to ultimately be wrong and that it lasts less than the other way around, the fact that it is systematically prolonged coupled with the fact that we do not know absolutely what is happening does not help not to the understanding of the players."
The do give us an approximation of how long maintenance will last. Things happen and sometimes they go long. There have been plenty of times maintenance has ended early. We don't tend to remember those because they don't cause us any delay. Human nature we tend to remember the negative more than the positive and that leads to a skewed view on how many times the bad happened compared to the good.
If they did come to the forums it wouldn't change how long the maintenance will last and to be honest I doubt any of us really care about the technical details.
Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent.
Which of these two types of companies do you think will have better customer satisfaction and retention?
Been here for 5 1/2 years. I'd call that retention.
We all know that even with the problems, ESO is the best mmorpg currently available. Plus it's part of the universally adored TES franchise. So it's an outlier in that sense. And if one thinks that ZOS doesn't take those facts into consideration when making these unpopular decisions, one would be be rather shortsighted and naive.
That sounded like a jab at the end there bud.
Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent. The latter results in less drama which means less work. People are angry and irrational as a group.
Oryctolagus wrote: »More communication is more fuel for the fire. I've seen companies try to be transparent and engaged, I've seen companies that are totally silent.
Which of these two types of companies do you think will have better customer satisfaction and retention?