Any chance of getting Riding Capacity instead of Speed in Daily Rewards?

huntgod_ESO

Have a full roster of 18, all speed and stamina maxed but still have a handful that need Capacity, so can't really use the Speed Vouchers from the daily rewards...

I guess I can store them now that I have all this extra storage space and use them when or if they add any more character slots.

Daemons_Bane

Overall, speed is the most useful of the 3.. so I can understand why they would choose that one.. I look very much forward to receiving it

Prof_Bawbag

huntgod_ESO wrote: »

Have a full roster of 18, all speed and stamina maxed but still have a handful that need Capacity, so can't really use the Speed Vouchers from the daily rewards...

I guess I can store them now that I have all this extra storage space and use them when or if they add any more character slots.

Never seen daily rewards being retrospectively changed.

One man's trash ... as they say. I've moved platform recently and probably like yourself, had niggles about the login rewards, but since starting a new account, and barring the poisons, I can totally see the point in the items we get now. Riding speed will be a helluva lot more valuable to more players than either stam or carry capacity. In fact, carry capacity is almost irrelevant on a new toon. Takes too long for it to become meaningful when added to daily. Plus the first bank and bag upgrades are as cheap as chips. Whereas speed upgrades are a god send. Stam is useful for not getting dismounted each time an enemy so much as sneezes in your direction.

So gonna have to strongly disagree with you here. Folk with years old accounts or 40 accounts don't need much in the way of horse upgrades whereas new players, with only a single toon, benefit greatly from speed upgrades. You have over a dozen toons to be getting on with whilst you work on their capacity, I only have 1 toon that currently has a 3 legged arthritic donkey.

Stinkyremy

Daemons_Bane wrote: »

Overall, speed is the most useful of the 3.. so I can understand why they would choose that one.. I look very much forward to receiving it

I think it is the opposite. Overall carry capacity is the most important thing

Prof_Bawbag

Stinkyremy wrote: »

Daemons_Bane wrote: »

Overall, speed is the most useful of the 3.. so I can understand why they would choose that one.. I look very much forward to receiving it

I think it is the opposite. Overall carry capacity is the most important thing

Personal preference so not knocking you, but you're the first person I have ever read saying that. I've never seen anyone in Cyrodiil or opening up new areas on new toon complain that the amount of bag space is their issue with mounts.

Sephyr

Prof_Bawbag wrote: »

Stinkyremy wrote: »

Daemons_Bane wrote: »

Overall, speed is the most useful of the 3.. so I can understand why they would choose that one.. I look very much forward to receiving it

I think it is the opposite. Overall carry capacity is the most important thing

Personal preference so not knocking you, but you're the first person I have ever read saying that. I've never seen anyone in Cyrodiil or opening up new areas on new toon complain that the amount of bag space is their issue with mounts.

I've all my mount speeds maxed out (as well as a maxed out roster) and would appreciate either carrying capacity or stamina as well.

Prof_Bawbag

Sephyr wrote: »

Prof_Bawbag wrote: »

Stinkyremy wrote: »

Daemons_Bane wrote: »

Overall, speed is the most useful of the 3.. so I can understand why they would choose that one.. I look very much forward to receiving it

I think it is the opposite. Overall carry capacity is the most important thing

Personal preference so not knocking you, but you're the first person I have ever read saying that. I've never seen anyone in Cyrodiil or opening up new areas on new toon complain that the amount of bag space is their issue with mounts.

I've all my mount speeds maxed out (as well as a maxed out roster) and would appreciate either carrying capacity or stamina as well.

Yeah, but login rewards are more or less aimed at new players or brand new toon. Research scrolls, xp scrolls, tri pots, foods, 5k gold, 5k ap etc etc aren't really aimed at max level characters. I mean, I could make more than 5k gold in the time it takes me to log in on my old cp1300 account. In keeping with the above, speed lessons are most sought after. If they weren't you yourself would be maxing both stam and capacity out before speed. You prioritise speed too.

Sephyr

Prof_Bawbag wrote: »

Sephyr wrote: »

Prof_Bawbag wrote: »

Stinkyremy wrote: »

Daemons_Bane wrote: »

Overall, speed is the most useful of the 3.. so I can understand why they would choose that one.. I look very much forward to receiving it

I think it is the opposite. Overall carry capacity is the most important thing

Personal preference so not knocking you, but you're the first person I have ever read saying that. I've never seen anyone in Cyrodiil or opening up new areas on new toon complain that the amount of bag space is their issue with mounts.

I've all my mount speeds maxed out (as well as a maxed out roster) and would appreciate either carrying capacity or stamina as well.

Yeah, but login rewards are more or less aimed at new players or brand new toon. Research scrolls, xp scrolls, tri pots, foods, 5k gold, 5k ap etc etc aren't really aimed at max level characters. I mean, I could make more than 5k gold in the time it takes me to log in on my old cp1300 account. In keeping with the above, speed lessons are most sought after. If they weren't you yourself would be maxing both stam and capacity out before speed. You prioritise speed too.

There's nothing stopping them from making an option of choice within the menu. Literally most games with daily rewards give you a choice, Guild Wars 2 being the most notable. The problem with the daily rewards is that it's aimed for loyalty of logging in - whether you're new or a vet. It's not just for 'new players'. That was their words at it's conception as a concept, that's what they continuously tout currently.