You could add them to your block list?
You could add them to your block list?
That doesn't magically make the problem disappear. The harasser still exists and is still able to go around and harass others. Calling out sexual harassers, reporting them, etc. is in my opinion one of the most meaningful way to hold them accountable for their actions, and enables those with the capability of removing them from the game (ZOS) to made aware of the player's actions and address them.
Dusk_Coven wrote: »
You could argue it's using a non-consensual, simulated sex-act for social ridicule. How grey that area is depends on the person its being enacted upon. It's not an activity I personally take part in because I see no point in it, but whatever people feel about it, it's not really something that's done for social graces, is it? Happens to me, it doesn't traumatise or haunt me, but I can understand it gets people's backs up--which is the point of it in practice.
[Quoted post was removed]
[Quoted post has been removed.]
Dusk_Coven wrote: »
You could argue it's using a non-consensual, simulated sex-act for social ridicule. How grey that area is depends on the person its being enacted upon. It's not an activity I personally take part in because I see no point in it, but whatever people feel about it, it's not really something that's done for social graces, is it? Happens to me, it doesn't traumatise or haunt me, but I can understand it gets people's backs up--which is the point of it in practice.
[Quoted post was removed]
Except they're not, not really. The grey area come into that it's a virtual world and a simulated act. It's an avatar crouching over another technically, nothing more. That people attach other connotations to it is another matter, and like I say, the real reason it's done at all. This is an ongoing bone of contention in many online games, and not a single one of them has ever taken an official stance on it to my knowledge. That said, it's an unpleasant practice intended to ridicule regardless.
Scarletblaze wrote: »i dont want to post details as i hope zos will make a fair judgment...let's just say it's hardcore and obvious harassment towards multiple people. this person has been reported several times too....i am determined to make sure zos takes what i submit seriously.
I assume this is on console with group voice chat in game.Scarletblaze wrote: »i dont want to post details as i hope zos will make a fair judgment...let's just say it's hardcore and obvious harassment towards multiple people. this person has been reported several times too....i am determined to make sure zos takes what i submit seriously.
Scarletblaze wrote: »Just curious...how serious does zos take sexual harassment? Does zos ban people for that?
Dusk_Coven wrote: »That's why legally, "assault" is any unwanted touch. That sets the bar low against people trying to exploit the law in order to actually attack others. Reasonable interpretation of the event by judge or jury prevents people from exploiting it the other way, claiming assault for frivolous reasons.
You could add them to your block list?
That doesn't magically make the problem disappear. The harasser still exists and is still able to go around and harass others. Calling out sexual harassers, reporting them, etc. is in my opinion one of the most meaningful way to hold them accountable for their actions, and enables those with the capability of removing them from the game (ZOS) to made aware of the player's actions and address them.
Dusk_Coven wrote: »Dusk_Coven wrote: »
You could argue it's using a non-consensual, simulated sex-act for social ridicule. How grey that area is depends on the person its being enacted upon. It's not an activity I personally take part in because I see no point in it, but whatever people feel about it, it's not really something that's done for social graces, is it? Happens to me, it doesn't traumatise or haunt me, but I can understand it gets people's backs up--which is the point of it in practice.
[Quoted post was removed]
Except they're not, not really. The grey area come into that it's a virtual world and a simulated act. It's an avatar crouching over another technically, nothing more. That people attach other connotations to it is another matter, and like I say, the real reason it's done at all. This is an ongoing bone of contention in many online games, and not a single one of them has ever taken an official stance on it to my knowledge. That said, it's an unpleasant practice intended to ridicule regardless.
Splitting hairs to defend vulgar behavior. The generally agreed upon intent -- "unpleasant practice intended to ridicule", if you want to put it mildly like that to try to strip it of all the vulgar sexual connotation of *** -- should be enough to put a ban on it.
The more vulgarity and assorted bad behaviors like exploiting that is allowed, the more a community will degenerate.
It's one thing to defend the right to do something when that something is essentially harmless. It's another to defend the right to do something (especially to someone else) when it's not harmless or when that person objects or is not able to object.
That's why legally, "assault" is any unwanted touch. That sets the bar low against people trying to exploit the law in order to actually attack others. Reasonable interpretation of the event by judge or jury prevents people from exploiting it the other way, claiming assault for frivolous reasons.
excuse me pls, but how it is even possible to sexually harass anyone in videogame?... I can't understand, you can not even send pictures through mail idk
Sexual harassment is defined as unwelcome sexual advances or other conduct that targets someone based on their sex, inclusive of gender harassment, making suggestive or discriminatory comments, and sexual coercion, or thereby forcing someone to perform (simulated/actual) sex acts. Examples of sexual harassment in online video games include targeted sexist jokes, sexually fuelled insults, unwanted sexual advances, *** jokes or sexual violence threats, and comments about players’ appearances