Staves 2H weapon

depravity_influence

So if staves are considered 2H weapons should'nt the 2handed passives work with them or am I missing something.

Raisin

They're different skillines.

Would you really prefer they renamed it to "Two-Handed Non-Magical Weapons" just because someone wants to split hairs about wording when the whole thing is perfectly understandable in context?

Taleof2Cities

Raisin wrote: »

They're different skillines.

Would you really prefer they renamed it to "Two-Handed Non-Magical Weapons" just because someone wants to split hairs about wording when the whole thing is perfectly understandable in context?

Slightly abrasive but agree ...

daim

>.<

depravity_influence

Raisin wrote: »

They're different skillines.

Would you really prefer they renamed it to "Two-Handed Non-Magical Weapons" just because someone wants to split hairs about wording when the whole thing is perfectly understandable in context?

Cross skills yo. Give me extra power for my staves. I completely understand the different skill lines thing I just find it strange that a stave is considered a 2H but yet a 2H passive doesnt work for it.

Raisin

depravity_influence wrote: »

Raisin wrote: »

They're different skillines.

Would you really prefer they renamed it to "Two-Handed Non-Magical Weapons" just because someone wants to split hairs about wording when the whole thing is perfectly understandable in context?

Cross skills yo. Give me extra power for my staves. I completely understand the different skill lines thing I just find it strange that a stave is considered a 2H but yet a 2H passive doesnt work for it.

The passives for the different skill lines are laid out the way they are for a reason. Now I won't comment on ZOS' ability to properly balance anything, but I personally think the concept that different weapons inherently have different strengths and weaknesses is important. I get why you may think switching the pasdives around would be cool, bit I don't think it would be healthy for ESO's combat.

But that is the point I'm making. You can use common sense to understand what Two-Handed weapons means in this context. Blunt & Blade, if you will. We both can understand that Greatswords, Mauls and Battle Axes fit into the same category, while Staves and Bows do not -- you get me? It's just a matter of going into the semantics of their choice of wording in labelling that category. I think you may be overthinking the issue.

Nord_Raseri

Fairly sure all staves are held in right hand only unless blocking besides, are you sure you want 2H passives? Not sure why you'd want "axes have chance to cause bleed damage" on your fire stick...