WrathOfInnos wrote: »You’re right about front bar NMA. This also lets you put your main ultimate back bar and using it without increasing its cost. Front bar ult will have 5% higher cost, but it can be something like Shooting Star just for the Mages Guild passives.
You still might have trouble sustaining even with no cost increase on back bar skills. NMA is typically combined with False Gods for this reason. Perfected False Gods ends up being a negligible difference in damage compared to Sorrow, and will cancel out the sustain curse of NMA.
One other thing about NMA is that it’s typically not used on Necromancer in end game scenarios because you don’t really need that much penetration (due to the Necro passive 1500 Spell Pen). It does help if you are missing a debuff like Alkosh, Crusher or Minor Breach. But just be aware that if a groups is coordinating debuffs the 4pc bonus on NMA will not do anything. The exception here is trial trash, since Crusher won’t be applied to everything NMA is good on all classes.
JackSmirkingRevenge wrote: »Jewelry enchants were enough. Is that the only reason nma underperforms? The stats seem really strong. Just cant settle on a good set combo. Ele succession looks solid if I could front bar ms?
JackSmirkingRevenge wrote: »With my current set up nma front bar and ms body I only use 1 rec piece and clockwork food. Also high elf. I dont have real sustain issues in trials, I weave pretty well I believe. I just want to make sure I'm using the right sets and didnt know if NMA was weak BECAUSE of possible sustain, or just weak because of the bonuses. If it's because of sustain and I seem to have good enough sustain with it, il probably use it. But if it is just a weak set, il swap it out....if that makes sense lol