I feel like it might devaluate his later return? He's kind of forced to stay in hiding a bit. I'm not personally keen on having him have another return, then going back into hiding again, then resurfacing again for the whole lich ordeal. He already has so much of a story, don't overdo it.
More like a bit later in the game.It's not that I particularly like Mannimarco, but I'd love to take part in the epic showdown between Mannimarco and Vanus Galerion, which is supposed to happen around this point in Tamriel's history.
TheShadowScout wrote: »...uhm... you DO know that Mannimarco does indeed return someday... in other TES games! (TES-II:Daggerfall and TES-IV:Oblivion, respectively). Yeah, he is killed in ESO - but a good necromancer never let that sort of minor setback stop 'em. And so, in due time, he will rise once more... but that will take a while.
http://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Mannimarco
Anything more in ESO would really be overusing the character methinks... after all, "been there, done that in", right?
And its not like there aren't more then enough more interesting villains to be thought up. Or even dredged up if they wanted to showcase some figures from TES lore...
Cygemai_Hlervu wrote: »Mannimarco is depicted as a typical modern characterless villain.. Perhaps if they hired someone like David Cage.. Until then Manny shows nothing outstanding especially in comparison even to some of the Daedric Princes. Sheogorath is the only one of them who deserves respect for the quality of his lore, while the others are plane and straightforward. Though I liked the Star Wars real canon for decades, I thought the same about Darth Vader, Palpatine, etc. They all are just comic book villains who share all the same features.. They are either good or bad, smart or mad, blond or red, A or B, dark or light. Sometimes they want to be the coolest, the most powerful, the most, the most, the most.. Why? Well, they want to save or destroy the world, to dominate, to be the best, etc.. Why?!.. Umph.. And there's no answer. The majority of villains are villains only because they either want to be the ones or are forced by the circumstances. That's all. But in order to create a really interesting villain his author has to create something more than a dumb thug who wants to rule the galaxy because he was forced to do it first and than he started to wish it.
They are no better than those James Bond adversaries.. Ah.. So silly they are.. I haven't seen any of the really interesting villain characters in fiction created in XXI century! Nothing at least equal to Hannibal Lecter, Sheogorath or, say, Keyser Söze. Neither heroes nor villains - none of them! But I was lucky enough to be proficient in several languages for some measure, so I could see some really great fictional villain characters of the past times in the fiction of different cultures. Some of them are really iconic. Well, here are just two of them I noticed in the Russian fiction. They both are based on the old good great German folklore and.. German history.. but they way they are depicted in Russian fiction staggers the imagination. Russian Woland, though based on the Mephistopheles character is a way much more developed character than J.W. Goethe's creation. I can't describe him with words - you have either to read it or watch the screenplay (just look into the eyes of that brilliant actor below). Müller was sentenced to be a villain IRL no fiction character can ever overcome. But the way he was depicted in that old 1973 Russian series - it is just.. wow!.. I doubt you'll ever be interested to read the books they come from or ever watch the movies, especially of old times, even if you find their German versions. Well, if you speak German of course .
The only one who stands along with them in TES is Sheogorath only. My hat is off to his creators. But Mannimarco is just an adult kid who's dreams came true - let him be the king of whatever and leave him in peace. I'll wait for a character developed or portrayed like these two:
1. Woland of the 1937 novel "The Master and Margarita" in a 2005 series of the same name:
2. Heinrich Müller in the 1973 espionage thriller series the "Seventeen Moments of Spring":
One of the most annoying features of many works of popular culture - be it books, video games, movies, etc. - is the inability to let stories come to their end, and let them stay there.
Stories are written towards an end, and we should let them have it. They are better because of it.
Constantly re-hashing old villains (or heroes...) that had their story come to a conclusion, diminishes their role, and the impact of the original story. In ESO's time line, Mannimarco has met the end of his story. He betrayed his companions (and a lot of other people, as far as we know), he tried to betray his new master, and paid for it. There is room for him to return in later (earlier) games, but those stories are only lightly connected to ESO's, and are complete stories of their own.
Find new villains for new stories. The old ones have served their purpose.