Looks like you don’t understand the difference between a la, skill, passive, or dot, cause your recap shows otherwise.
Been looking at bg numbers, where cp does not matter. I am running 5 piece Heavy, max resists, and have 23% reduced player dmg, From Necro, plus item bonuses. I am getting hit with 2600 to 3k light attack weaves on recap. They are hitting me harder than any skill ability besides Ultimates in the game. Thats a little overkill for Light Attacks. What would these La's be hitting me for on a more fragile build? Now i see why people are up in arms and wan't things the same.
Looks like you don’t understand the difference between a la, skill, passive, or dot, cause your recap shows otherwise.
The screenshots are there to show the damage, Im aware those are dots. Sadly richochet skull is that bad. Those numbers would be acceptable if i was a full glass cannon build in leather, Not a full pvp tank build.
Littlebluelizard wrote: »
Littlebluelizard wrote: »
Yeah 20 percent would be FINE, but 78 percent?! THATS LUDICROUS! Who thinks of these things? Its probably the same person that thought nerfing dots by 60 percent was a good idea.
price101610 wrote: »I’m guessing this whole discussion is revolving around pvp. Once again, everyone jumps on the nerf bandwagon at the expense of PVE. I’m all down for balancing damage where skills hit harder and LA’s do less damage, but the end gamers god mode parses getting nerfed into the ground will only make content more difficult for everyone. If you’ve ever blown through a normal trial on a gear farm, it wasn’t because of the guy pulling 40k on the iron, it was because of the 2 or 3 70-80k guys that turned a 12 man trial into, effectively, a 15-16 man trial. Careful what you wish for, unless you live in bg’s and cyro.
James-Wayne wrote: »LA has always been too high hence the problem we have between high and low APM. Nerf light attack damage only and we instantly close the APM gap. Case closed.
Dusk_Coven wrote: »Instead of touching too many things like having to re-examine everything related to both LA and HA, how about just removing LA weaving and rebalancing trials.
Beastygrowls wrote: »It's almost as bad as leetspeak for us noobs when you use acronyms and initials. WHAT ON EARTH IS LA????????????????