Maintenance for the week of July 14:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – July 14

Banking Storage Space idea?

Inhuman003
Inhuman003
✭✭✭✭✭
I think Bank Space inventory should be individually divided in all eight inventory bracket slots. Where you can store each individual slots up to 480 on all 8. This would be easy for everyone to enjoy storage space for baking.

I feel like this has been a personal problem for many players that need their own true inventory space instead of depending on guilds all the time on guild bank inventory space. So the players can have the freedom that they truly need to actually feel like they achieve something without having limitations.
  • Sylvermynx
    Sylvermynx
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Eh, ain't hap'nin. The bank/storage thing is based in real money, which ZoS isn't going to change. If you want real storage capability, buy ESO+. That's the bottom line.

    (And yes, I buy ESO+ on two accounts. I'm not stupid. Storage is EVERYTHING.)
  • Inhuman003
    Inhuman003
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sylvermynx wrote: »
    Eh, ain't hap'nin. The bank/storage thing is based in real money, which ZoS isn't going to change. If you want real storage capability, buy ESO+. That's the bottom line.

    (And yes, I buy ESO+ on two accounts. I'm not stupid. Storage is EVERYTHING.)

    LOL I have two accounts and ESO+ as well
  • idk
    idk
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    So make the bank individual instead of account-based?

    Edit: If you are suggesting that every character will get their own 480 slots, then I must inform you that it will not happen anytime soon. Zos has limited our bank and bag storage capacity due to server load issues. The more items in that storage, the larger the server load when one looks into that inventory. It is why the last increase in storage space we gained were chests that were not tied into any other inventory.

    This is not from years of working with networks and databases but from the reasons Zos gave for why they are not adding a furnishings bag.
    Edited by idk on March 15, 2020 4:57AM
  • Zulera301
    Zulera301
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    only way I see this happening is if ZOS offered more slots to buy with gold/crowns/money.
    they wouldn't ever just give them out for free.
    Shortly after the formation of the Ebonheart Pact, a Nord woman was given a tour of the Tribunal Temple. When later asked about the experience, she seemed upset. Suffice to say, the Dunmer were not pleased to hear this, and thus they inquired further.
    "Well," the Nord frowned, "the priests were very angry and unwelcoming. They kept shouting things at me like "you can't drink that mead in here!" and "somebody stop her, she's running naked!" and "we can't catch her; she's covered in grease!""
  • Inhuman003
    Inhuman003
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    idk wrote: »
    So make the bank individual instead of account-based?

    Edit: If you are suggesting that every character will get their own 480 slots, then I must inform you that it will not happen anytime soon. Zos has limited our bank and bag storage capacity due to server load issues. The more items in that storage, the larger the server load when one looks into that inventory. It is why the last increase in storage space we gained were chests that were not tied into any other inventory.

    This is not from years of working with networks and databases but from the reasons Zos gave for why they are not adding a furnishings bag.

    No no no I'm talking about every in the Tory slot of the 8 types of storage should have 480 bank space Individually.

    Weapon space 480, Apparel space 480, Jewelry space 480, Consumable space 480, Materials space 480, Furnishings space 480, Miscellaneous space 480, and junk space 480. Do you understand me now of all of them individually having their own amount of 480 each?
  • Mayrael
    Mayrael
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Inhuman003 wrote: »
    idk wrote: »
    So make the bank individual instead of account-based?

    Edit: If you are suggesting that every character will get their own 480 slots, then I must inform you that it will not happen anytime soon. Zos has limited our bank and bag storage capacity due to server load issues. The more items in that storage, the larger the server load when one looks into that inventory. It is why the last increase in storage space we gained were chests that were not tied into any other inventory.

    This is not from years of working with networks and databases but from the reasons Zos gave for why they are not adding a furnishings bag.

    No no no I'm talking about every in the Tory slot of the 8 types of storage should have 480 bank space Individually.

    Weapon space 480, Apparel space 480, Jewelry space 480, Consumable space 480, Materials space 480, Furnishings space 480, Miscellaneous space 480, and junk space 480. Do you understand me now of all of them individually having their own amount of 480 each?

    Yes we do understand you and in general we would appreciate such solution but ZO$ by purpose makes inventory management a bit harder so you will pay for convenience.
    Personally I have 14 mules, all storage chests and ESO+, with all of this I have enough storage space to play without worrying about it.
    Say no to Toxic Casuals!
    I am doing my best, but I am not a native speaker, sorry.


    "Difficulty scaling is desperately needed. 9 years. 6 paid expansions. 24 DLCs. 40 game changing updates including A Realm Reborn-tier overhaul of the game including a permanent CP160 gear cap and ridiculous power creep thereafter. I'm sick and tired of hearing about Cadwell Silver&Gold as a "you think you do but you don't"-tier deflection to any criticism regarding the lack of overland difficulty in the game." - @AlexanderDeLarge
  • Lysette
    Lysette
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just throw away all those fillers we get on a daily basis - if you won't use it anyway, why store it then - i deleted all what I won't use at all or anytime soon and now i have lots of space available again. Free yourself from the burden of stuff just stored for the purpose of hoarding.
    Edited by Lysette on March 15, 2020 5:20PM
  • idk
    idk
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Inhuman003 wrote: »
    idk wrote: »
    So make the bank individual instead of account-based?

    Edit: If you are suggesting that every character will get their own 480 slots, then I must inform you that it will not happen anytime soon. Zos has limited our bank and bag storage capacity due to server load issues. The more items in that storage, the larger the server load when one looks into that inventory. It is why the last increase in storage space we gained were chests that were not tied into any other inventory.

    This is not from years of working with networks and databases but from the reasons Zos gave for why they are not adding a furnishings bag.

    No no no I'm talking about every in the Tory slot of the 8 types of storage should have 480 bank space Individually.

    Weapon space 480, Apparel space 480, Jewelry space 480, Consumable space 480, Materials space 480, Furnishings space 480, Miscellaneous space 480, and junk space 480. Do you understand me now of all of them individually having their own amount of 480 each?

    For the very same reasons that I stated it would not happen per character, it will not happen with this design you are suggesting. The reasons Zos gave for not adding a furnishings bag apply here.

    it becomes easy to see this added load with the guild store. It has historically taken a long time for it to load in, That is because the number of unique items the server has to load in is greater due to having more slots available. Zos is trying to improve server stability and this idea would bring it in the wrong direction.

    I say this as someone who would welcome more storage but understands why Zos is reluctant to provide it.
  • InaMoonlight
    InaMoonlight
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Make bound and un-bound stack, ask upon retrival ;D
    Edit = Typos ... as usual. <;D
Sign In or Register to comment.