Hippie4927 wrote: »If you take the quest and Stuga goes away and then abandon the quest, does she come back?
Siohwenoeht wrote: »How do folks stand having their quest logs full? I never have more than 5 active, not counting crafting dailies and usually have them finished before logging off, except of course if I don't want to do wrothgar right away. Just take the quest from Stuga.
Oh, don't kill the messenger ... or contemplate killing the messenger. She is just a hard working npc.
In any case, I much rather put up with Stuga and Corporal "Hold! I was sent for you!" Bredrek (who even follows you down into the ritual chamber of the Mages Guild) than having to pluck my quest starts from the interface.
Hippie4927 wrote: »If you take the quest and Stuga goes away and then abandon the quest, does she come back?
FrancisCrawford wrote: »People often observe that, if they didn't have ESO+, they might be spared some DLC dungeons in the random dungeon finder. But that's not a problem for everyone; many of us don't do random dungeons, at least not on max level characters who might be sent to DLCs.
But it also occurs to me -- the intrusive quest attackers, like Stuga, in any cases are tied to chapters and DLCs as well. So not having access to them might keep one from being plagued by quests there's no quest-log room to accept.
Obviously, if ZoS increased the size of quest logs for ESO+ subscribers, this would be a stupid discussion. But absent that, wouldn't unsubscribing from ESO+ actually make the game in some ways more pleasant??
Accept the quest, go to Orsinium. Complete the quest. Done. 3 minutes. Less then writing this thread.
Siohwenoeht wrote: »How do folks stand having their quest logs full? I never have more than 5 active, not counting crafting dailies and usually have them finished before logging off, except of course if I don't want to do wrothgar right away. Just take the quest from Stuga.
It's always been said that a full quest list can impact on performance, including loading screens.
Integral1900 wrote: »(Bangs head on table out of general disbelief)
Step one
Accept quest
Step two
Ignore quest, just let it sit there... who the hell ever filled the WHOLE quest list!!!!!!
Step three
No more interruptions
Sigh....
Integral1900 wrote: »(Bangs head on table out of general disbelief)
Step one
Accept quest
Step two
Ignore quest, just let it sit there... who the hell ever filled the WHOLE quest list!!!!!!
Step three
No more interruptions
Sigh....
Integral1900 wrote: »(Bangs head on table out of general disbelief)
Step one
Accept quest
Step two
Ignore quest, just let it sit there... who the hell ever filled the WHOLE quest list!!!!!!
Step three
No more interruptions
Sigh....
Integral1900 wrote: »(Bangs head on table out of general disbelief)
Step one
Accept quest
Step two
Ignore quest, just let it sit there... who the hell ever filled the WHOLE quest list!!!!!!
Step three
No more interruptions
Sigh....
People who used this method 25 times filled their WHOLE quest log. I don't think I've had less than 16 active quests on any given character after about level 10.
Lady_Linux wrote: »Siohwenoeht wrote: »How do folks stand having their quest logs full? I never have more than 5 active, not counting crafting dailies and usually have them finished before logging off, except of course if I don't want to do wrothgar right away. Just take the quest from Stuga.
i think you may have add if you are allowing yourself to complete every quest thrust upon you to completion... it's annoying to have so many distractions
It's always been said that a full quest list can impact on performance, including loading screens. There is absolutely no good reason to take on more quests than you can sensibly deal with at one time.
What I suspect people are doing is automatically accepting all quests from silent quest-givers as they pass them by, so they don't forget they're there later, and then complaining about the noisy quest-givers they're ignoring when they pass them by. There seems to me to be an easy answer to that, just reverse the approach.