BaiterOfZergs wrote: »This patch is trash but why is the thread labeled stam tank meta ? It’s not exclusive to stam , if anything it’s more prevalent with magic builds.
BaiterOfZergs wrote: »This patch is trash but why is the thread labeled stam tank meta ? It’s not exclusive to stam , if anything it’s more prevalent with magic builds.
Wrong, it favors Stamina builds. haven't you been playing enough PVP?
BaiterOfZergs wrote: »BaiterOfZergs wrote: »This patch is trash but why is the thread labeled stam tank meta ? It’s not exclusive to stam , if anything it’s more prevalent with magic builds.
Wrong, it favors Stamina builds. haven't you been playing enough PVP?
Yeah , years of pvp and play both magic & stam. Magic builds still have more healing and utility at their disposal.
It’s not stam builds running around keeping themselves, zergs and ball groups alive. Some can dish out good off heals but again not at the same level as a mag build. Plus , the good defense and utility sets are only magic based.
It would be a different argument if you said stam was better at building tanky jack of all trade builds for small scale scenarios. But even that’s debatable these days since a lot of magic weaknesses have been covered by new additions to the game since launch. Only thing magic is typically missing is a large stam pool even though it’s people running around with 18-20k stam.
The problem is with stamina classes that have better item sets than magicka classes. You can have high weapon damage,penetration, mitigation and sustain at the same time while magicka ones cant. Stamina classes can have high damage and sustain in heavy armor but magicka classes will suck with sustain and damage with heavy. In light you need to use a defensive set to become tanky and it reduces your damage. Magicka classes cant invest damage sustain and tankyness at the same time. For example in my stam dk i have 6k+ wep damage, nearly 15k penetration, nearly 35k resist and major protection with just BRP dw. I use 2 damage sets in heavy armor and one of them is NMA and sustain is still ok. If i use 2 damage sets in heavy armor with a magicka class i can never sustain well with it. Still with 2 damage sets in heavy armor wont do enough damage because you need the penetration in light armor. Stamina classes should be nerfed with either sustain or tankyness. They can start with major protection like BRP dw. Magicka classes are really more difficult to sustain enough than stamina classes.
Thats not true, I see a wide range of Stamraces. Bosmer is very often used as well, mainly by those who dodgerole a lot thanks to the Penetration passive and Orcs are still the most used Stamsorcs, Nords get most used by DKs.
BaiterOfZergs wrote: »BaiterOfZergs wrote: »This patch is trash but why is the thread labeled stam tank meta ? It’s not exclusive to stam , if anything it’s more prevalent with magic builds.
Wrong, it favors Stamina builds. haven't you been playing enough PVP?
Yeah , years of pvp and play both magic & stam. Magic builds still have more healing and utility at their disposal.
It’s not stam builds running around keeping themselves, zergs and ball groups alive. Some can dish out good off heals but again not at the same level as a mag build. Plus , the good defense and utility sets are only magic based.
It would be a different argument if you said stam was better at building tanky jack of all trade builds for small scale scenarios. But even that’s debatable these days since a lot of magic weaknesses have been covered by new additions to the game since launch. Only thing magic is typically missing is a large stam pool even though it’s people running around with 18-20k stam.
Nope, my StamDK can Heal, Tank and do tons of DMG it's a beast in PVP while my Mag builds stand no chance, so i just stick to my Stamina builds, Mags are super squishy they die before i even finish my rotation, you may be doing something wrong with your build cause they stand no chance against Stamina build.
It doesn't matter if Magicka or Stamina, use S and B and you are untouchable these days.
The worst are the Templars in my opinion, because they can hold block, while spamming Heals and Purge and if they want they jab you to death with no weapon or Magic damage even needed, you can't escape anyway.
Thats not true, I see a wide range of Stamraces. Bosmer is very often used as well, mainly by those who dodgerole a lot thanks to the Penetration passive and Orcs are still the most used Stamsorcs, Nords get most used by DKs.
usmguy1234 wrote: »BaiterOfZergs wrote: »BaiterOfZergs wrote: »This patch is trash but why is the thread labeled stam tank meta ? It’s not exclusive to stam , if anything it’s more prevalent with magic builds.
Wrong, it favors Stamina builds. haven't you been playing enough PVP?
Yeah , years of pvp and play both magic & stam. Magic builds still have more healing and utility at their disposal.
It’s not stam builds running around keeping themselves, zergs and ball groups alive. Some can dish out good off heals but again not at the same level as a mag build. Plus , the good defense and utility sets are only magic based.
It would be a different argument if you said stam was better at building tanky jack of all trade builds for small scale scenarios. But even that’s debatable these days since a lot of magic weaknesses have been covered by new additions to the game since launch. Only thing magic is typically missing is a large stam pool even though it’s people running around with 18-20k stam.
Nope, my StamDK can Heal, Tank and do tons of DMG it's a beast in PVP while my Mag builds stand no chance, so i just stick to my Stamina builds, Mags are super squishy they die before i even finish my rotation, you may be doing something wrong with your build cause they stand no chance against Stamina build.
Maybe you're playing your magicka builds wrong? If you're trying to 1vx on a magic class, you're going to have a bad time. That's stamina's lane. If you're trying to xv1 or xvx, you'll be fine. That is magicka's lane. If you're still struggling playing to magicka's strength, its time to start looking inward because the issue is you.
usmguy1234 wrote: »BaiterOfZergs wrote: »BaiterOfZergs wrote: »This patch is trash but why is the thread labeled stam tank meta ? It’s not exclusive to stam , if anything it’s more prevalent with magic builds.
Wrong, it favors Stamina builds. haven't you been playing enough PVP?
Yeah , years of pvp and play both magic & stam. Magic builds still have more healing and utility at their disposal.
It’s not stam builds running around keeping themselves, zergs and ball groups alive. Some can dish out good off heals but again not at the same level as a mag build. Plus , the good defense and utility sets are only magic based.
It would be a different argument if you said stam was better at building tanky jack of all trade builds for small scale scenarios. But even that’s debatable these days since a lot of magic weaknesses have been covered by new additions to the game since launch. Only thing magic is typically missing is a large stam pool even though it’s people running around with 18-20k stam.
Nope, my StamDK can Heal, Tank and do tons of DMG it's a beast in PVP while my Mag builds stand no chance, so i just stick to my Stamina builds, Mags are super squishy they die before i even finish my rotation, you may be doing something wrong with your build cause they stand no chance against Stamina build.
Maybe you're playing your magicka builds wrong? If you're trying to 1vx on a magic class, you're going to have a bad time. That's stamina's lane. If you're trying to xv1 or xvx, you'll be fine. That is magicka's lane. If you're still struggling playing to magicka's strength, its time to start looking inward because the issue is you.
Stam DPS are tanky due to skillfully anticipating burst combos and blocking accordingly
Mag DPS can be tanky in the same way.
But actual tanks are people who build either heavy armor + a 5pc mitigation set, or who stack HP.
And those real tanks are predominantly magicka, because magicka has better tools for supporting those builds and that playstyle.
usmguy1234 wrote: »BaiterOfZergs wrote: »BaiterOfZergs wrote: »This patch is trash but why is the thread labeled stam tank meta ? It’s not exclusive to stam , if anything it’s more prevalent with magic builds.
Wrong, it favors Stamina builds. haven't you been playing enough PVP?
Yeah , years of pvp and play both magic & stam. Magic builds still have more healing and utility at their disposal.
It’s not stam builds running around keeping themselves, zergs and ball groups alive. Some can dish out good off heals but again not at the same level as a mag build. Plus , the good defense and utility sets are only magic based.
It would be a different argument if you said stam was better at building tanky jack of all trade builds for small scale scenarios. But even that’s debatable these days since a lot of magic weaknesses have been covered by new additions to the game since launch. Only thing magic is typically missing is a large stam pool even though it’s people running around with 18-20k stam.
Nope, my StamDK can Heal, Tank and do tons of DMG it's a beast in PVP while my Mag builds stand no chance, so i just stick to my Stamina builds, Mags are super squishy they die before i even finish my rotation, you may be doing something wrong with your build cause they stand no chance against Stamina build.
Maybe you're playing your magicka builds wrong? If you're trying to 1vx on a magic class, you're going to have a bad time. That's stamina's lane. If you're trying to xv1 or xvx, you'll be fine. That is magicka's lane. If you're still struggling playing to magicka's strength, its time to start looking inward because the issue is you.
This is basically what i'm saying, it is Stamina's lane, Mags are only good for support in groups they are very good at it,
But outside of that they are a walking corpse.
Nord_Raseri wrote: »Every time I see "Tank Meta" on these threads I'm thinking everyone is hating on my tank, but then I see you're actually talking about really tanky dps, and not actual tanks...
BaiterOfZergs wrote: »The only magic specs that are bad in 1vx scenarios are magnecro and magwarden. Magdk, Magplar and mag sorc definitely can hold their own right now.
Nord_Raseri wrote: »Every time I see "Tank Meta" on these threads I'm thinking everyone is hating on my tank, but then I see you're actually talking about really tanky dps, and not actual tanks...
That's what everyone is running nowadays including myself a tanky boi with a lot of dps and healing, idk which type of tank urs is.
BaiterOfZergs wrote: »The only magic specs that are bad in 1vx scenarios are magnecro and magwarden. Magdk, Magplar and mag sorc definitely can hold their own right now.
idk, for me it's Wardens and Necros rather than Sorc, the only problem i had with Sorc is to target them while they hide behind their pets, which is super annoying but other than that once u target them they dead.
Wardens and Necros can do it better than Sorc from my own experience.
I hold my own solo magplar and MagWarden. Issue is moreso getting overwhelmed by small scale groups because of lack of speed. MagWarden in CP is tough because a lot of times you don’t have enough burst to take out someone solo, but it’s doable. Magplar plays a better kite and burst, LoS, and burst the first one who follows. I expect to win every 1v1 I come across, but I’m leery about stamwardens. I don’t win every 1v1, not even close, but I do okay.
Mag shine in small scale groups
I hold my own solo magplar and MagWarden. Issue is moreso getting overwhelmed by small scale groups because of lack of speed. MagWarden in CP is tough because a lot of times you don’t have enough burst to take out someone solo, but it’s doable. Magplar plays a better kite and burst, LoS, and burst the first one who follows. I expect to win every 1v1 I come across, but I’m leery about stamwardens. I don’t win every 1v1, not even close, but I do okay.
Mag shine in small scale groups
They do shine in small scale groups if the tanks are stupid, if you play against smart players, which whom they target the supports first,
i always target the mags first, because i know if i fight another tank dps someone in the back will support them so i'm screwed the best move is to take them out first which is way easier than dealing with a tank dps.
I hold my own solo magplar and MagWarden. Issue is moreso getting overwhelmed by small scale groups because of lack of speed. MagWarden in CP is tough because a lot of times you don’t have enough burst to take out someone solo, but it’s doable. Magplar plays a better kite and burst, LoS, and burst the first one who follows. I expect to win every 1v1 I come across, but I’m leery about stamwardens. I don’t win every 1v1, not even close, but I do okay.
Mag shine in small scale groups
They do shine in small scale groups if the tanks are stupid, if you play against smart players, which whom they target the supports first,
i always target the mags first, because i know if i fight another tank dps someone in the back will support them so i'm screwed the best move is to take them out first which is way easier than dealing with a tank dps.
Ah, how small is your group? I think around 6+ there’s no reason to bring stam at all.
Mag are generally squishier because stam choose all self heals and mag’s heals are a crap shoot. Half the time I’m trying to heal myself it goes to someone else.
You see this all the time in BGs. The new player who doesn’t heal themselves takes me out in the group because they steal all my healing. Stam and magsorcs can both be liabilities because of the design. I don’t have the sustain to carry others in BGs so we all die.
Mag isn’t weaker, it’s mostly how they’ve designed the self heals in the game. Bring 4 mag against 4 stam and the mag will do fine.