Dottzgaming wrote: »This is a good share that all content creators need to look at who make content on YT.
Specifically for ESO, we theoretically should be fine, since ESO fundamentally is targeted at people 16+, the FTC would have a hard time proving that we are making videos that are targeted to kids under 13.
The only sure way to stay out of legal trouble with the FTC after January as a video game related channel is to mark all your videos as content directed towards kids.
Versispellis wrote: »The only sure way to stay out of legal trouble with the FTC after January as a video game related channel is to mark all your videos as content directed towards kids.
@RinaldoGandolphi I have a question. How would you say this works in regards to video games that are very clearly not marketed toward children? Like, say, Bloodborne, with all the flesh rending and blood and so forth. Couldn't you be accused of bad conduct by flagging something like that as okay for child consumption?
Sylvermynx wrote: »Thank you VERY much @RinaldoGandolphi - I don't have yt videos, but I have a friend who does. And a friend who died had a YT channel, and we have some of his vids on a forum I run privately. They'll have to go.... He can't be sued, but as the site owner, I CAN. Can't do it....
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »Sylvermynx wrote: »Thank you VERY much @RinaldoGandolphi - I don't have yt videos, but I have a friend who does. And a friend who died had a YT channel, and we have some of his vids on a forum I run privately. They'll have to go.... He can't be sued, but as the site owner, I CAN. Can't do it....
I would think if you marked them as "private" and only shared them with a select few people you could keep the videos active.
I am just going by what I was told/advised. Things are muddy right now, and simply put not many people have the money or time to deal with something like this. Everyones situation is different.
My best suggestion is you know your content best., Ask yourself if you think kids under 13 could be a large portion of the audience to your videos, and be hoenst with yourself about that. If so then you probably want to mark them, if not you have to decide if the risks are worth it to you.
PS: lots more kids play ESO than you think. All my nieces and newphews that are 12 and under play on Xbox and PS4, you would be surprised how many of those players that never get on voice comms, etc are actually young kids. Don't think only older people play ESO.
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »Versispellis wrote: »The only sure way to stay out of legal trouble with the FTC after January as a video game related channel is to mark all your videos as content directed towards kids.
@RinaldoGandolphi I have a question. How would you say this works in regards to video games that are very clearly not marketed toward children? Like, say, Bloodborne, with all the flesh rending and blood and so forth. Couldn't you be accused of bad conduct by flagging something like that as okay for child consumption?
that's a good question. My understanding is there is a difference between "kid friendly" and "targeted towards kids" For example COPPA doesn't care if their is violence, gore, rated R content or any of that. What they are concerned about is if the content is targeted towards kids specifically as the audience.
Best example is Call of Duty, despite that game being rated M ERSB for Mature 17+, that game is largely marketed towards children, and a very large part of that games population is kids under 13. So obviously if your making videos on Youtube about Call of Duty(a shooting game where you kill people) despite it being rated M, its still content targeted towards a kids audience.
Also, marking content as "target towards kids" is not the same as a kid friendly rating. Youtube does have a seperate Age Restriction setting on your videos that you cna restrict views to people under a certain age but using it removes your monetization options on those videos
At the end of the day I guess its your call on what you want to risk.
Bobby_V_Rockit wrote: »So because parents cant control what their idiot kids watch on youtube, they killed youtube? Way to go Moms and Dads of America
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »Dottzgaming wrote: »This is a good share that all content creators need to look at who make content on YT.
Specifically for ESO, we theoretically should be fine, since ESO fundamentally is targeted at people 16+, the FTC would have a hard time proving that we are making videos that are targeted to kids under 13.
This is not true. Google/YouTube themselves tried to use this same line of defense in this case and lost.
Since I am a nice person, I am going to share what I have learned and save all of you a lot of money and headache. My Best Friend (since we were 5 years old) owns a law office, and has 2 lawyers who work under him. I went to him a few weeks ago when i heard about this.
(This case was actually settled on September 4th, Google has just recently put controls in place)
After a few weeks, he gave me a call, I sat down with him, and this is the expert legal advice I was told by 3 fully qualified lawyers:
- All video game related YouTube channels that are monetized are certainly in violation of COPPA the way the law is currently written. (unless marked for kids)
- The Federal courts opinion(the only one that matters) sees the video game industry as largely marketed towards kids, and even the ERSB will agree with this assessment. For this reason, if you are sued by the FTC over your video game channel, the odds are very very very very slim you could win with the way the law is currently written. Especially when your content is centered on a subject matter that is largely marketed towards children.
- This won't be something you can contest via YouTube like a Copyright claim, the FTC will actually serve you, probably via certified mail, an actual lawsuit you will be required to show up in Federal Court. In the time between your court date they will probably offer to settle with you for a substantial amount of money (20grand per video or so)
- Depending on your location it will cost you between 5-7k dollars to get an attorney to respond to this suit, and then ongoing fees there after. If you lose your case it could cost you over 100,000 dollars in court and legal fees.
- The way the law is written it is simply against the law to show any advertisements, monetize videos contextually, and to mine user data(in this case Google) to kids under 13. Again, Since the courts see video games as largely marketed towards children, you don't want to be on the wrong side of these FTC lawsuits.
- The FTC is on record stating they are going after YouTube creators AGGRESSIVELY in January. They are not going to watch every single YouTube video they flag, they are going to flag it, and then send you a letter to settle for a large amount of money and remove your stuff, you refuse, they sue you. What they flag will be what they see as kid targeted, not what we think, big difference, and it will be up to you to prove otherwise. Remember, in civil cases, they only have to prove a "Preponderance of Evidence" not "beyond a reasonable doubt" its much easier for them to win a civil lawsuit than a criminal case.
- The FTC has given examples which I will show below, but the key point is :On the other hand, if your content includes traditional children’s pastimes or activities, it may be child-directed. Video games have been traditionally a childrens past time and activity. Even though Adults play them too, kids do just as well. This is where video game channels are in hot water. I
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2019/11/youtube-channel-owners-your-content-directed-children
Simply put, if you are a video gaming directed channel, and primarily post videos about video games, you would be wise to mark your channel and your videos as "content directed towards kids" Failing to do so, you do at your own peril. As soon as the FTC is done going after the BIG money makers on YouTube, they will then be coming after you. That lawyer that posted that video from is from California(most liberal state in the nation) He obviously has nothing to worry about because his channel is focused on business and legal advice, but he wasn't focusing his advice on video gaming channels. He touches on it very briefly and warns he is "worried" about certain YouTube Channels with gaming being one of the ones he was most concerned with.
I was advised by my legal counsel to remove all of my videos from YouTube and to pull out now. Its simply not worth the legal ramifications of 6 figures worth of fines and debt. I have all my videos on my hard drive, if the law changes, i can put them back. For now, as the law stands now, you run the real risk of being sued out of existence.
The only sure way to stay out of legal trouble with the FTC after January as a video game related channel is to mark all your videos as content directed towards kids. You will lose most of YouTube features, comments, and monetization, but the alternative is being sued in Federal Court or fined.
It;s very doubtful you could convince a Federal judge that your video gaming channel is not kid targeted content when the entire video game industry is marketed to kids. Thats a very slippery slope to try and walk up on. Unless you have spare 200,000 dollars laying around to fight this in court for years, you would be wise to mark the videos as "kids content" or simply stop uploading to Youtube and find another platform. As the law stands now, it is illegal to monetize personalized contexual ads to kids in videos that kids are the targeted audience, and video games is predominant marketed to kids even though adults play them.
Take care