thatlaurachick wrote: »You're asking when almost every mount, pet, costume, and hairstyle in the game is reskinned? I'm not bashing ZOS, there is a limit to how much disk space the game should use.
thatlaurachick wrote: »You're asking when almost every mount, pet, costume, and hairstyle in the game is reskinned? I'm not bashing ZOS, there is a limit to how much disk space the game should use.
thatlaurachick wrote: »You're asking when almost every mount, pet, costume, and hairstyle in the game is reskinned? I'm not bashing ZOS, there is a limit to how much disk space the game should use.
My current Battle for Azeroth WOW folder is 67 gig. That game has more unique mounts alone then the entirety of unique mobs in eso + mounts + pets.
Disc space is not the issue, ZO$ willing to invest more into the game is.
thatlaurachick wrote: »You're asking when almost every mount, pet, costume, and hairstyle in the game is reskinned? I'm not bashing ZOS, there is a limit to how much disk space the game should use.
My current Battle for Azeroth WOW folder is 67 gig. That game has more unique mounts alone then the entirety of unique mobs in eso + mounts + pets.
Disc space is not the issue, ZO$ willing to invest more into the game is.
You really think that WoW and ESO have the same number of vertices/level of detail in their models???
That’s not how it works though. You are comparing grilled cheese to cake. The number of ingredients and complexity aren’t equal. Could Zos have made better cake? Yes they could have, starting from scratch they didn’t make a solid cake base. But it’s still cake. Sometimes it’s okay not to have intimate knowledge of how things compare. I’m not disagreeing on the basic premise of the thread, they absolutely could do with more variety. However space is a concern and it absolutely cannot be compared to WoW when technical details are involved.
If I remember correctly, WoW is also guilty of reskinning assets and calling them different names, just sayin'
If I remember correctly, WoW is also guilty of reskinning assets and calling them different names, just sayin'
"WoW did it first" is a sad excuse for everything wrong in MMORPGs since WoW came out, though. "If WoW could get away with it and make a profit from it, we'll do it too" is basically the way most games have been developped in the past decade.
I would imagine it’s because the same *** still sells.
There’s a relatively small number of people who want to have every possible horse and pet and the cost of the collector’s set is less than the cost of the two separately.
Reskinning mounts is cheap and the imagination/will to do anything more ambitious is expensive and absent.
It’s lazy arsed marketing... I mean who the hell thinks XP scrolls are an incentive any more? Maybe if you put in outfit slots you might get a look in... but XP scrolls? You might as well put in a pile of those “type DESTROY to get rid of” potions you keep dumping on us like chemical waste.
The last genuinely interesting Collector’s bundle was for Dragon Bones.
drkfrontiers wrote: »
That’s not how it works though. You are comparing grilled cheese to cake. The number of ingredients and complexity aren’t equal. Could Zos have made better cake? Yes they could have, starting from scratch they didn’t make a solid cake base. But it’s still cake. Sometimes it’s okay not to have intimate knowledge of how things compare. I’m not disagreeing on the basic premise of the thread, they absolutely could do with more variety. However space is a concern and it absolutely cannot be compared to WoW when technical details are involved.
That’s not how it works though. You are comparing grilled cheese to cake. The number of ingredients and complexity aren’t equal. Could Zos have made better cake? Yes they could have, starting from scratch they didn’t make a solid cake base. But it’s still cake. Sometimes it’s okay not to have intimate knowledge of how things compare. I’m not disagreeing on the basic premise of the thread, they absolutely could do with more variety. However space is a concern and it absolutely cannot be compared to WoW when technical details are involved.
Please don't try to speak technology.
thatlaurachick wrote: »You're asking when almost every mount, pet, costume, and hairstyle in the game is reskinned? I'm not bashing ZOS, there is a limit to how much disk space the game should use.
My current Battle for Azeroth WOW folder is 67 gig. That game has more unique mounts alone then the entirety of unique mobs in eso + mounts + pets.
Disc space is not the issue, ZO$ willing to invest more into the game is.