ESO 4k Texture pack

aLi3nZ

Before:


After:


Before:


After:


Before:


After:


Before:



After:

This is not actually a 4k Texure pack. This is the difference with using Nvidia Experience game Filter. Tint, vibrance and sharpness has been adjusted.

Vlad9425

I complain a lot about this game but it has to be said that the art team are doing a fantastic job at making this game look great 👍

Keledus

Not a big fan of it and really doubt that it's ''4k'' all that seems to change is the brightness.
Looks more like you put a filter over the picture.

Vhozek

Grains.

Hazurko_RaShan

well either a. you been snookered and all they did was adjust the gamma or b. i have a 1080p tv and cant see the difference.

Eirinin

It's lighter. And bluer. But that's all I see, difference wise.

p_tsakirisb16_ESO

aLi3nZ wrote: »

This is not actually a 4k Texure pack. This is the difference with using Nvidia Experience game Filter. Tint, vibrance and sharpness has been adjusted.

a) Title is misleading
b) It looks horribly worse mass sharpening of the objects having that grain look and artefacting.

If you want to truly make the game render 4K even if you are on lesser monitor like 2560x1440, and have better overall texture

a) SET MIP_LOAD_SKIP_LEVELS "-3"
b) Set the game to exclusive full screen and force it to render the ingame engine at 4K by setting
SET FullscreenHeight "2160"
SET FullscreenWidth "3840"


Also word of advice make sure your Nvidia card is rendering the full spectrum of RGB 0-255 and not the culled version by default Nvidia has set by placing the Output dynamic range to Full from Limited and go o the NV control panel and set it to full RGB range also.

It looks better than the screenshot which is processed by imgur to reduce the original better quality from 15mb file. (also atm is raining in Tamriel so no sun). But you take an idea

Vhozek

Hazurko_RaShan wrote: »

well either a. you been snookered and all they did was adjust the gamma or b. i have a 1080p tv and cant see the difference.

You can still see 4k textures on a 1080p screen. What you can't see is 4k resolution which is different.

p_tsakirisb16_ESO

Was looking as the same site where the OP took the screenshot with he flaming camel, as it's in Murkmire, but close enough.
Again image is size truncated by imgur since the original is over 15mb in size, and of much better quality.
But thats how the game looks with 4K ingame engine rendering at 2560x1440. No need for grainy image sharpening filters that make it look bad.
What this game needs is big more tesselation at the stone objects.

GraphicArtistYT

Belmara wrote: »

Not a big fan of it and really doubt that it's ''4k'' all that seems to change is the brightness.
Looks more like you put a filter over the picture.

Lol exposed

p_tsakirisb16_ESO

GraphicArtistYT wrote: »

Belmara wrote: »

Not a big fan of it and really doubt that it's ''4k'' all that seems to change is the brightness.
Looks more like you put a filter over the picture.

Lol exposed

But the OP said so at the spoiler hidden under the images.

This is not actually a 4k Texure pack. This is the difference with using Nvidia Experience game Filter. Tint, vibrance and sharpness has been adjusted.

And disappeared after pointing the obvious, that they do look crap compared to proper 4K rendering the ingame engine can do. (the images posted myself).

InvictusApollo

I just use reashade and settings file edit to make it even more beautifull on my 4k screen.
I wonder though whether this Nvidia setting has any impact on performance.

rumple9

This is the best reshade to use

https://nexusmods.com/elderscrollsonline/mods/55

NotaDaedraWorshipper

I find the oversaturated after pictures uglier. Making things brighter and more saturated doesn't mean it's better graphic-wise.

Numerikuu

4K? All i see is a brightness, saturation, sharpness, and luminosity change. Looks worse imo.

Needs more grain lol.

Jayman1000

"Texture pack"? I dont think these words means what you think it means. From your screenshots it seems you applied some filtering. Reshade or Nvidias Geforce Experience filters? Definately not a texture pack!

The screenshots are obviously only 1920x1080 resolution, but maybe you are using Nvidia DSR to sample a 4K resolution to 1920x1080?

As to the result I find the filtered images too grainy; too much Sharpen filter it seems (for my taste, I guess that's subjective).

nafensoriel

As others have said this doesn't really touch textures.

As information through 4k textures are often NOT what you want. You want OPTIMIZED TEXTURES.
A properly done texture with the appropriate maps at 1k will look BETTER than an unoptimized simply upscaled 4k texture.

Additionally, most textures are too small to utilize the detail of a 4k texture. If your screen will display less pixel density than the texture while the item covered in said texture is on the screen... then youve just nuked performance for a distorted image.

Textures are far more complex than simple size. It takes a true artist to make good textures for video games as there is a ton more to consider than simple resolution.

Vhozek

Jayman1000 wrote: »

"Texture pack"? I dont think these words means what you think it means. From your screenshots it seems you applied some filtering. Reshade or Nvidias Geforce Experience filters? Definately not a texture pack!

The screenshots are obviously only 1920x1080 resolution, but maybe you are using Nvidia DSR to sample a 4K resolution to 1920x1080?

As to the result I find the filtered images too grainy; too much Sharpen filter it seems (for my taste, I guess that's subjective).

The resolution won't do much for the textures. You can still clearly tell 4k textures in a non4k screen. Just download 4k Rocks in Skyrim and see for yourself.