You can barely harvest in any of the decent spots anymore because they are over run by bots. When you report them nothing happens. The bots are getting more advanced and becoming overwhelming in areas. Are they permitted to stay around because they indirectly boost crown sales of what is the reasoning for allowing it?
VaranisArano wrote: »No, ESO doesn't.
That doesnt mean they are removed as often or as promptly as players would like.
The Devs are adamant that the best way to deal with them is for players to report them. What I've noticed from past times when players reported bots is that ZOS tends to collect reports and then sweep through banning bots en masse rather than responding to individual reports. And unfortunately, even when ZOS bans the bots, there are new bots back in the same place within a couple of days.
Dealing with bots is a little like the man tossing starfish washed up by the tide. "Made a difference to that one!"...but because of the persistence of botters, the task is Sisphyean.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »I'm often unsure if I see a bot, or if I see a person farming.
VaranisArano wrote: »No, ESO doesn't.
That doesnt mean they are removed as often or as promptly as players would like.
VaranisArano wrote: »No, ESO doesn't.
That doesnt mean they are removed as often or as promptly as players would like.
Lol. Or ever.
Donny_Vito wrote: »Support? No.
Advocate against? No, as well.
It's just something you have to deal with. Don't waste your energy and precious time following around suspected bots to report them. You have much better things to do with your time that will actually be rewarding.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »I'm often unsure if I see a bot, or if I see a person farming.
Trinity_Is_My_Name wrote: »For reporting on Consoles it will be much more difficult because these Bots have names like w234jjfalkj3098u or something similar to make it hard to report them.
redlink1979 wrote: »Trinity_Is_My_Name wrote: »For reporting on Consoles it will be much more difficult because these Bots have names like w234jjfalkj3098u or something similar to make it hard to report them.
Bigger problem to report on consoles is that you don't report the account, you report the char.
It would be simpler and faster to report the account rather than the chars being used.
Last time I was in Alik'r (2 days ago), one account was running 8 bots a bit west of the blacksmith survey report location (this is a recurrent spot for farming bots).Had to report chars one by one because I can't report the account id.
Donny_Vito wrote: »Support? No.
Advocate against? No, as well.
It's just something you have to deal with. Don't waste your energy and precious time following around suspected bots to report them. You have much better things to do with your time that will actually be rewarding.
Says the botter apparently. It's in the EULA and yes, report bots every chance you get.
Part 4 Section C of the ESO EULA:
In addition to the restrictions, conditions and limitations set forth in the ZeniMax Terms of Service and the ZeniMax Code of Conduct, the license granted to you in this Agreement is subject to the conditions, restrictions and limitations set forth in Sections 1, 2, and this Section 4 of this Agreement (collectively, the "License Limitations"). Any use of the Game in violation of the License Limitations will be regarded as an infringement of ZeniMax's copyrights in and to the Game and will be a breach of this Agreement. You agree that you will not and will not assist any other person, under any circumstances:
C. use cheats, automation software (bots), hacks, mods or any other unauthorized third-party software designed to modify the Game or adversely impact any other persons playing of the Game or his/her experience of playing the Game;
VaranisArano wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »No, ESO doesn't.
That doesnt mean they are removed as often or as promptly as players would like.
Lol. Or ever.
I don't know your platform or your experience, but every time I've reported bots over a period of a couple days, they've eventually been removed. Usually it took about a week. Once I even got to watch a Gamemaster nuke the bot train farming harpies in Rivenspire. I told him he missed a bot and he took care of it.
And without fail, within a couple days, a new bot or bot train was back.
So in my experience, what I said is true. ZOS does remove bots, but it's definitely not as quickly or as often as I'd like.
VaranisArano wrote: »ZOS does remove bots, but it's definitely not as quickly or as often as I'd like.
Are they permitted to stay around because they indirectly boost crown sales of what is the reasoning for allowing it?
Are they permitted to stay around because they indirectly boost crown sales of what is the reasoning for allowing it?
Just one single in-game GM hopping platforms, wielding a large bot banning hammer for 8 hours a day would be enough to get rid of that plague in less than a month.
As you already stated, it's not a technical problem, it's a monetary problem ...
lordrichter wrote: »Are they permitted to stay around because they indirectly boost crown sales of what is the reasoning for allowing it?
Just one single in-game GM hopping platforms, wielding a large bot banning hammer for 8 hours a day would be enough to get rid of that plague in less than a month.
As you already stated, it's not a technical problem, it's a monetary problem ...
Seriously? We are still sticking to that? The only reason that might work is like the cop sitting on the side of the road. People think they will get in trouble. If the botters decide that this is just more "business expense", that poor GM would have a life-long job. Figuratively speaking. It would take that GM longer to make one full circuit of the game with the ban hammer than it would for the botters to set up their next set of bots and get them started. At the end of the month, there would probably be the same number of bots in the game.
lordrichter wrote: »Seriously? We are still sticking to that? The only reason that might work is like the cop sitting on the side of the road. People think they will get in trouble. If the botters decide that this is just more "business expense", that poor GM would have a life-long job. Figuratively speaking. It would take that GM longer to make one full circuit of the game with the ban hammer than it would for the botters to set up their next set of bots and get them started. At the end of the month, there would probably be the same number of bots in the game.Just one single in-game GM hopping platforms, wielding a large bot banning hammer for 8 hours a day would be enough to get rid of that plague in less than a month.Are they permitted to stay around because they indirectly boost crown sales of what is the reasoning for allowing it?
As you already stated, it's not a technical problem, it's a monetary problem ...