I know we all love the 5% increase to weapon damage plus another 3% from the Slayer passive but many times I try slotting another ultimate and end up reslotting flawless db. Did they purposely make it bis for stam dps? It seems like the utility of lesser ultimates dont make up for the raw damage increase. Where do you submit nerf requests? Like 96% of every build that's out there uses it. I think its over the top. Maybe like a -43% damage reduction?
/munches_popcorn
Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »I know we all love the 5% increase to weapon damage plus another 3% from the Slayer passive but many times I try slotting another ultimate and end up reslotting flawless db. Did they purposely make it bis for stam dps? It seems like the utility of lesser ultimates dont make up for the raw damage increase. Where do you submit nerf requests? Like 96% of every build that's out there uses it. I think its over the top. Maybe like a -43% damage reduction?
/munches_popcorn
Sure, go ahead and nerf it. Just make sure you give us good class ultimates in return for stam.
I know we all love the 5% increase to weapon damage plus another 3% from the Slayer passive but many times I try slotting another ultimate and end up reslotting flawless db. Did they purposely make it bis for stam dps? It seems like the utility of lesser ultimates dont make up for the raw damage increase. Where do you submit nerf requests? Like 96% of every build that's out there uses it. I think its over the top. Maybe like a -43% damage reduction?
/munches_popcorn
Nerftheforums wrote: »People use dbos because it's one of the few good stam ults. People don't use it because it's op, people use it because there isn't another choice.
Stamsorc has no stam ult.
Stamden has no burst ult, perma is good but not as good when you're not in a medium to big size group (6+), dbos just grants you kills more reliably.
Templar has...radiant sweep? Total poop, especially after the nerf to major protection it just received.
Dks have leap, but you know how bad leap used to work. Idk for this patch but the times it failed to connect used to be more or less a third of the times it hit. Moreover, it scatters people around which isn't really optimal, especially if you play in groups.
Stamnbs have incap, but atm, on live, you have an ult playing against yourself if you can't cast it before 120 ult. Using dbos has never been so appealing on stamnb as in this patch.
Nerftheforums wrote: »People use dbos because it's one of the few good stam ults. People don't use it because it's op, people use it because there isn't another choice.
Stamsorc has no stam ult.
Stamden has no burst ult, perma is good but not as good when you're not in a medium to big size group (6+), dbos just grants you kills more reliably.
Templar has...radiant sweep? Total poop, especially after the nerf to major protection it just received.
Dks have leap, but you know how bad leap used to work. Idk for this patch but the times it failed to connect used to be more or less a third of the times it hit. Moreover, it scatters people around which isn't really optimal, especially if you play in groups.
Stamnbs have incap, but atm, on live, you have an ult playing against yourself if you can't cast it before 120 ult. Using dbos has never been so appealing on stamnb as in this patch.
Read your stuff again. You start well, but then your point actually shifts. In the end, you conclude Dawnbreaker is simply BETTER than the other ults. So it IS overperforming.
Look at magicka players! DK has the same issues as its stamina brethren. So does templar. Soul Harvest is now comparable to Incap, magblades used to chose the stam morph prior. Warden is cool, literally. But sorc has an expensive, tricky and just situational atronach. And what do magicka classes to compensate? Effing delayed, telegraphed, expensive, no WW bonus Meteor.
Dawnbreaker is leagues above that.
Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Nerftheforums wrote: »People use dbos because it's one of the few good stam ults. People don't use it because it's op, people use it because there isn't another choice.
Stamsorc has no stam ult.
Stamden has no burst ult, perma is good but not as good when you're not in a medium to big size group (6+), dbos just grants you kills more reliably.
Templar has...radiant sweep? Total poop, especially after the nerf to major protection it just received.
Dks have leap, but you know how bad leap used to work. Idk for this patch but the times it failed to connect used to be more or less a third of the times it hit. Moreover, it scatters people around which isn't really optimal, especially if you play in groups.
Stamnbs have incap, but atm, on live, you have an ult playing against yourself if you can't cast it before 120 ult. Using dbos has never been so appealing on stamnb as in this patch.
Read your stuff again. You start well, but then your point actually shifts. In the end, you conclude Dawnbreaker is simply BETTER than the other ults. So it IS overperforming.
Look at magicka players! DK has the same issues as its stamina brethren. So does templar. Soul Harvest is now comparable to Incap, magblades used to chose the stam morph prior. Warden is cool, literally. But sorc has an expensive, tricky and just situational atronach. And what do magicka classes to compensate? Effing delayed, telegraphed, expensive, no WW bonus Meteor.
Dawnbreaker is leagues above that.
Are we still talking about the PvE side here? I mean, sure, it's pvp forum but flawless is the pve morph. Also: destro ult.
man i just wish they buff up the 2H/DW Ultis..........
Read your stuff again. You start well, but then your point actually shifts. In the end, you conclude Dawnbreaker is simply BETTER than the other ults. So it IS overperforming.
Look at magicka players! DK has the same issues as its stamina brethren. So does templar. Soul Harvest is now comparable to Incap, magblades used to chose the stam morph prior. Warden is cool, literally. But sorc has an expensive, tricky and just situational atronach. And what do magicka classes to compensate? Effing delayed, telegraphed, expensive, no WW bonus Meteor.
Dawnbreaker is leagues above that.
There are just a few skills in this game that most people use because they’re good. That’s fine, it doesn’t make them OP. Should we nerf elemental drain, wall of elements, elemental weapon, vigor, rending slashes, endless hail, rearming trap, caltrops, poison injection, ransack, mutagen, healing springs, and every other skill used by a certain role?man i just wish they buff up the 2H/DW Ultis..........
2H ult is fine, and the DW ult is very strong but the bow ult is better so there’s no point in slotting it if you want absolutely top tier dps. But if you like it you could still use it. I like it in vMA sometimes.
Read your stuff again. You start well, but then your point actually shifts. In the end, you conclude Dawnbreaker is simply BETTER than the other ults. So it IS overperforming.
Look at magicka players! DK has the same issues as its stamina brethren. So does templar. Soul Harvest is now comparable to Incap, magblades used to chose the stam morph prior. Warden is cool, literally. But sorc has an expensive, tricky and just situational atronach. And what do magicka classes to compensate? Effing delayed, telegraphed, expensive, no WW bonus Meteor.
Dawnbreaker is leagues above that.
Crescent Sweep is actually pretty nice. It's just hard to land on a slow class, even with the much-needed range increase.
CatchMeTrolling wrote: »It’s partially too good and it’s also not any other ults to use. Either way the recent buff was unnecessary. Even if you buff the other ults dawnbreaker will still be better.