Should flurry get a larger buff?
ochsinator
✭✭✭
Should flurry get a larger buff? I see that currently stam dks are using breath as a spammable which is ridiculous. If they don’t want classes using dots as spammables they need to give stamina classes better spammables.
0
-
Ragnarock41✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭DKs get %25 cost reduction to poison, which is what pushes people to use nox as a spammable over flurry or something else.1 -
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭They need to fix the 300% final hit not scaling like it seems it ought to, see more here- https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/441718/flurry-and-morphs-300-final-hit-not-scaling-correctly-from-percent-amps0 -
ochsinator✭✭✭Ragnarock41 wrote: »DKs get %25 cost reduction to poison, which is what pushes people to use nox as a spammable over flurry or something else.
@Ragnarock41
Yeah I main a stam dk I don’t want to have to use noxious as a spammable we should red a reduction to physical damage abilities lol1 -
Ragnarock41✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »They need to fix the 300% final hit not scaling like it seems it ought to, see more here- https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/441718/flurry-and-morphs-300-final-hit-not-scaling-correctly-from-percent-amps
I agree that should be fixed. It feels like I'm asking for too much but this is probably the one and only chance to make this ability decent again.0 -
Ragnarock41✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭ochsinator wrote: »Ragnarock41 wrote: »DKs get %25 cost reduction to poison, which is what pushes people to use nox as a spammable over flurry or something else.
@Ragnarock41
Yeah I main a stam dk I don’t want to have to use noxious as a spammable we should red a reduction to physical damage abilities lol
That I would prefer too but my point is that flurry and noxious is not a fair comparission because of this passive. I also don't like noxious being used as a spammable but thats not my main problem with that rotation, Its the double bar molten whip.0
