Should flurry get a larger buff?

ochsinator

Should flurry get a larger buff? I see that currently stam dks are using breath as a spammable which is ridiculous. If they don’t want classes using dots as spammables they need to give stamina classes better spammables.

Ragnarock41

DKs get %25 cost reduction to poison, which is what pushes people to use nox as a spammable over flurry or something else.

Lightspeedflashb14_ESO

They need to fix the 300% final hit not scaling like it seems it ought to, see more here- https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/441718/flurry-and-morphs-300-final-hit-not-scaling-correctly-from-percent-amps

ochsinator

Ragnarock41 wrote: »

DKs get %25 cost reduction to poison, which is what pushes people to use nox as a spammable over flurry or something else.

@Ragnarock41

Yeah I main a stam dk I don’t want to have to use noxious as a spammable we should red a reduction to physical damage abilities lol

Ragnarock41

Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »

They need to fix the 300% final hit not scaling like it seems it ought to, see more here- https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/441718/flurry-and-morphs-300-final-hit-not-scaling-correctly-from-percent-amps

I agree that should be fixed. It feels like I'm asking for too much but this is probably the one and only chance to make this ability decent again.

Ragnarock41

ochsinator wrote: »

Ragnarock41 wrote: »

DKs get %25 cost reduction to poison, which is what pushes people to use nox as a spammable over flurry or something else.

@Ragnarock41

Yeah I main a stam dk I don’t want to have to use noxious as a spammable we should red a reduction to physical damage abilities lol

That I would prefer too but my point is that flurry and noxious is not a fair comparission because of this passive. I also don't like noxious being used as a spammable but thats not my main problem with that rotation, Its the double bar molten whip.

Chilly-McFreeze

I would use it again if it could proc e.g. Ravager