The part you are missing is not the math but the fact that the self proclaimed "hardcore" players of this game label everything "trash" that is not the current meta, even if that "trash" performs within fractions of a percent of whatever the current meta set is.
At 50k+ (group buffed trial) dps, having a few hundred dps less on average won't make any difference for you as a player but for them that means you are wearing a "useless decon trash" set.
Until next patch, when your useless decon trash now all the sudden performs a few hundred dps above last weeks meta and now has become the one and only set to ever be usable ever again. Until the next patch.
Rinse and repeat ...
PancakeHead wrote: »Does anyone know how people seem to know all the mathematics of the game or what set(s) are better than others based on recent patches or the history of the game? Right now I see people saying mother's sorrow and burning spellweave are best in class for trials based on recent patches, but how does anyone know that? When I've written to the company asking how that stuff is calculated, they reply they want everyone to experience the game for themselves. I've spent hours farming sets only to be told they suck and then two months later be told they're great. People bash sioria and spell strategist as only being dummy good but then people doing flawless VMA have them equipped.
Was more just curious what resources people are using to determine this stuff because I don't find much help online.
Thanks.
. Does anyone know how people seem to know all the mathematics of the game or what set(s) are better than others based on recent patches or the history of the game?
BejaProphet wrote: »The answer to your actual question is that games like this attract some truely brilliant people. These people could probably do some amazing things if their lives weren’t devoted to video games. But applying their exceptionalism to the game, the reverse engineer hidden game formulas, do insanely rigorous scientifically exact testing, and by the time they are done they legitimately understand this game better than most developers.
I’m not joking, there have been many occasions when players were giving info more reliable than ZOS employees.
The part you are missing is not the math but the fact that the self proclaimed "hardcore" players of this game label everything "trash" that is not the current meta, even if that "trash" performs within fractions of a percent of whatever the current meta set is.
At 50k+ (group buffed trial) dps, having a few hundred dps less on average won't make any difference for you as a player but for them that means you are wearing a "useless decon trash" set.
Until next patch, when your useless decon trash now all the sudden performs a few hundred dps above last weeks meta and now has become the one and only set to ever be usable ever again. Until the next patch.
Rinse and repeat ...
Why do you assume they haven’t? There are lots of careers where it’s useful to be able to look over large amounts of information, dissect issues, and identify opportunities. Careers like investment management, software engineering and actuarial science come to mind.BejaProphet wrote: »The answer to your actual question is that games like this attract some truely brilliant people. These people could probably do some amazing things if their lives weren’t devoted to video games ...
The part you are missing is not the math but the fact that the self proclaimed "hardcore" players of this game label everything "trash" that is not the current meta, even if that "trash" performs within fractions of a percent of whatever the current meta set is.
In 3 years of playing i have never heard someone being called out if he or she was doing good dps while not wearing the absolute bis set.
lordrichter wrote: »In 3 years of playing i have never heard someone being called out if he or she was doing good dps while not wearing the absolute bis set.
The fact that ESO does not have an inspection feature helps curb this sort of thing. If ESO had an inspection, then people could kick non-conformists before they can do any damage. As it is, people can't just get this information freely, and unless there is a reason to ask, they never ask.
lordrichter wrote: »In 3 years of playing i have never heard someone being called out if he or she was doing good dps while not wearing the absolute bis set.
The fact that ESO does not have an inspection feature helps curb this sort of thing. If ESO had an inspection, then people could kick non-conformists before they can do any damage. As it is, people can't just get this information freely, and unless there is a reason to ask, they never ask.
CP levels is more toxic in this game that gear level in other games.
Of course we are not talking about top players being toxic about CP as they are not the ones who complain about CP related stuff in the forums, nor are they the ones who kick a lower CP player from a group. They can carry the lower CP player easily in most cases.
PancakeHead wrote: »Does anyone know how people seem to know all the mathematics of the game or what set(s) are better than others based on recent patches or the history of the game?
Was more just curious what resources people are using to determine this stuff because I don't find much help online.
This will get you started
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/209938/pts-2-1-2-sorcerer-arithmagic/p1
While the above is Magic, you can plug in Stamina and figure it out
There is a thread on damage mitigation by @paulsimonps but I don't have it bookmarked, but that covers the other side of the math.