InvictusApollo wrote: »If I could swap the default scamp skin for magma scamps skin then I would be very, very happy.
But pet users are such a low demographic that I doubt ZOS will bother making us happier.
Angelus3701 wrote: »Damn i need this so bad. It is alread implemented with the Bear for wardens, we sorcies need it a swell.
Lol all the crowns i will spend is amazing...
lassitershawn wrote: »ZoS would make an ENORMOUS amount of money from this. If the twilight had a flame atro skin (little weird with shock damage but I'm sure they can make it work somehow) I would instantly shell out 5k crowns and I think most of my sorc friends would as well. Literally anything other than an ugly bird reptile woman thing tbh (even just a smaller storm atro that floats like the Skyrim ones...?). All the cat lovers would pay through the roof for a warden cat ult instead of bear. Alternate scamp skins (magma, stonefire) would be epic.
InvictusApollo wrote: »lassitershawn wrote: »ZoS would make an ENORMOUS amount of money from this. If the twilight had a flame atro skin (little weird with shock damage but I'm sure they can make it work somehow) I would instantly shell out 5k crowns and I think most of my sorc friends would as well. Literally anything other than an ugly bird reptile woman thing tbh (even just a smaller storm atro that floats like the Skyrim ones...?). All the cat lovers would pay through the roof for a warden cat ult instead of bear. Alternate scamp skins (magma, stonefire) would be epic.
A flame atronach model but with lightning effects - a female lightning atronach - thats what I would buy instantly, even if I had to buy crowns instead of using my eso+ crowns.
New creatures would be new skills which is a fundamentally different development than skins variants are.
That new variants of the existing combat pets haven't materialized, even as crate rewards, suggests that perhaps the primary factor is that ZOS wants to keep the pet system simple and straightforward. You're using a pet because that skill is important to you, not because the appearance has more appeal than the combat.
New creatures would be new skills which is a fundamentally different development than skins variants are.
That new variants of the existing combat pets haven't materialized, even as crate rewards, suggests that perhaps the primary factor is that ZOS wants to keep the pet system simple and straightforward. You're using a pet because that skill is important to you, not because the appearance has more appeal than the combat.
No, I'm using a pet because I like pets.
God only knows, in its current lacklustre state, it gets me killed (if I'm stupid enough to try to res it) more than it saves me.
Please don't assume you know why other people choose to use pets.
lassitershawn wrote: »InvictusApollo wrote: »lassitershawn wrote: »ZoS would make an ENORMOUS amount of money from this. If the twilight had a flame atro skin (little weird with shock damage but I'm sure they can make it work somehow) I would instantly shell out 5k crowns and I think most of my sorc friends would as well. Literally anything other than an ugly bird reptile woman thing tbh (even just a smaller storm atro that floats like the Skyrim ones...?). All the cat lovers would pay through the roof for a warden cat ult instead of bear. Alternate scamp skins (magma, stonefire) would be epic.
A flame atronach model but with lightning effects - a female lightning atronach - thats what I would buy instantly, even if I had to buy crowns instead of using my eso+ crowns.
Yea I can't get around it being a bit weird to have lightning damage on a flame atro I would even say convert the damage to flame and cut the damage by ~5% (making it more or less equivalent to current damage accounting for engulfing and sorc shock damage passive) but putting actual skill changes in the crown store is a bad idea... maybe make it one of the blue flame atros so at least there isn't any color contrast?
lassitershawn wrote: »InvictusApollo wrote: »lassitershawn wrote: »ZoS would make an ENORMOUS amount of money from this. If the twilight had a flame atro skin (little weird with shock damage but I'm sure they can make it work somehow) I would instantly shell out 5k crowns and I think most of my sorc friends would as well. Literally anything other than an ugly bird reptile woman thing tbh (even just a smaller storm atro that floats like the Skyrim ones...?). All the cat lovers would pay through the roof for a warden cat ult instead of bear. Alternate scamp skins (magma, stonefire) would be epic.
A flame atronach model but with lightning effects - a female lightning atronach - thats what I would buy instantly, even if I had to buy crowns instead of using my eso+ crowns.
Yea I can't get around it being a bit weird to have lightning damage on a flame atro I would even say convert the damage to flame and cut the damage by ~5% (making it more or less equivalent to current damage accounting for engulfing and sorc shock damage passive) but putting actual skill changes in the crown store is a bad idea... maybe make it one of the blue flame atros so at least there isn't any color contrast?
Very good point about a fire atro having lightning damage. And this is a good reason why the skins will probably not happen.
Having a flame atro do lightning damage obviously does not make sense and would just mean one thread after another saying it should be changed to flame damage. That means we now have different skins each bringing about a specific type of damage which creates more and more work and very likely more and more problems.
So in the end Zos learns a lot from these threads and in this case they learn it is a bad idea to create pet skins.
Its enough seeing all these winged twilights glitch out the game. Unsummon your *** pets!!!
And no, skin is so dumb. Thats a bear. Those are summoned daedras. Stop braking lore and go play skyrim if you want a thomas the train engine skin on your dragon but leave this game normal and be happy it already has flaming demons as mounts.
Its enough seeing all these winged twilights glitch out the game. Unsummon your *** pets!!!
And no, skin is so dumb. Thats a bear. Those are summoned daedras. Stop braking lore and go play skyrim if you want a thomas the train engine skin on your dragon but leave this game normal and be happy it already has flaming demons as mounts.
Um? I don't think anyone is asking for Thomas the Train. What I would like is a wolf instead of a bear for my warden wyress. A hawk instead of a cliff racer. That kind of thing. The whole Morrowind theme to the animal companions line just doesn't visually work for some of my characters. All I want are some lore friendly, already-exist-in-game options.
InvictusApollo wrote: »If I could swap the default scamp skin for magma scamps skin then I would be very, very happy.
But pet users are such a low demographic that I doubt ZOS will bother making us happier.
Its enough seeing all these winged twilights glitch out the game. Unsummon your *** pets!!!
And no, skin is so dumb. Thats a bear. Those are summoned daedras. Stop braking lore and go play skyrim if you want a thomas the train engine skin on your dragon but leave this game normal and be happy it already has flaming demons as mounts.
Um? I don't think anyone is asking for Thomas the Train. What I would like is a wolf instead of a bear for my warden wyress. A hawk instead of a cliff racer. That kind of thing. The whole Morrowind theme to the animal companions line just doesn't visually work for some of my characters. All I want are some lore friendly, already-exist-in-game options.
^ This.
@Peritye The whole point of this thread and discussion is that people want MORE immersion, not less. Summoning a wolf or tiger instead of a bear, or changing the colour/element of Daedric summons, is in no way lore breaking. Quite the opposite actually. Also, your annoyance with people's pets is another discussion entirely - so please, there is no need to bring that negativity here too