redspecter23 wrote: »Direct in this context means a non dot ability. Flurry counts as a damage over time and as such, will not trigger abilities that require a direct attack.
redspecter23 wrote: »Direct in this context means a non dot ability. Flurry counts as a damage over time and as such, will not trigger abilities that require a direct attack.
redspecter23 wrote: »Direct in this context means a non dot ability. Flurry counts as a damage over time and as such, will not trigger abilities that require a direct attack.
So how do stamplars proc Ravager (also melee) with jabs? This is also considered a DoT as thaumaturge buffs it
SaintSubwayy wrote: »redspecter23 wrote: »Direct in this context means a non dot ability. Flurry counts as a damage over time and as such, will not trigger abilities that require a direct attack.
So how do stamplars proc Ravager (also melee) with jabs? This is also considered a DoT as thaumaturge buffs it
Ravager procs from meeledmg...which jabs are
nothing to do with either channel or dot...
the term "Meeledmg" only takes the Range of skills into account (range, or meele)
while DOT defines the type of DMG (DOT or DirectDMG)
Channel is how the skill is fired (Channel or instandcast)
Flurry doesn't count as melee dmg. As stupid as that sounds, that's how zos rolls.
redspecter23 wrote: »Direct in this context means a non dot ability. Flurry counts as a damage over time and as such, will not trigger abilities that require a direct attack.
Flurry doesn't proc ravager, and ravager just requires melee dmg. Guess what though? Jabs can proc ravager, and jabs is also a channel. A lot of people also claim that only the initial hit from jabs can proc it. That's not true, any hit can.
Flurry is just bugged and they refuse to fix it.
SaintSubwayy wrote: »redspecter23 wrote: »Direct in this context means a non dot ability. Flurry counts as a damage over time and as such, will not trigger abilities that require a direct attack.
So how do stamplars proc Ravager (also melee) with jabs? This is also considered a DoT as thaumaturge buffs it
Ravager procs from meeledmg...which jabs are
nothing to do with either channel or dot...
the term "Meeledmg" only takes the Range of skills into account (range, or meele)
while DOT defines the type of DMG (DOT or DirectDMG)
Channel is how the skill is fired (Channel or instandcast)
Except ravager is both a channel and a dot.
Ravager is also supposed to proc from any melee dmg.
Flurry is obviously a melee attack but it doesn't count as one, therefore it's bugged...
SaintSubwayy wrote: »redspecter23 wrote: »Direct in this context means a non dot ability. Flurry counts as a damage over time and as such, will not trigger abilities that require a direct attack.
So how do stamplars proc Ravager (also melee) with jabs? This is also considered a DoT as thaumaturge buffs it
Ravager procs from meeledmg...which jabs are
nothing to do with either channel or dot...
the term "Meeledmg" only takes the Range of skills into account (range, or meele)
while DOT defines the type of DMG (DOT or DirectDMG)
Channel is how the skill is fired (Channel or instandcast)
Except jabs is both a channel and a dot.
Ravager is also supposed to proc from any melee dmg.
Flurry is obviously a melee attack but it doesn't count as one, therefore it's bugged...
SaintSubwayy wrote: »redspecter23 wrote: »Direct in this context means a non dot ability. Flurry counts as a damage over time and as such, will not trigger abilities that require a direct attack.
So how do stamplars proc Ravager (also melee) with jabs? This is also considered a DoT as thaumaturge buffs it
Ravager procs from meeledmg...which jabs are
nothing to do with either channel or dot...
the term "Meeledmg" only takes the Range of skills into account (range, or meele)
while DOT defines the type of DMG (DOT or DirectDMG)
Channel is how the skill is fired (Channel or instandcast)
Except jabs is both a channel and a dot.
Ravager is also supposed to proc from any melee dmg.
Flurry is obviously a melee attack but it doesn't count as one, therefore it's bugged...
This is pretty much what I was getting at. Flurry is basically a weak version of jabs, so they should be able to proc the same sets
SaintSubwayy wrote: »SaintSubwayy wrote: »redspecter23 wrote: »Direct in this context means a non dot ability. Flurry counts as a damage over time and as such, will not trigger abilities that require a direct attack.
So how do stamplars proc Ravager (also melee) with jabs? This is also considered a DoT as thaumaturge buffs it
Ravager procs from meeledmg...which jabs are
nothing to do with either channel or dot...
the term "Meeledmg" only takes the Range of skills into account (range, or meele)
while DOT defines the type of DMG (DOT or DirectDMG)
Channel is how the skill is fired (Channel or instandcast)
Except jabs is both a channel and a dot.
Ravager is also supposed to proc from any melee dmg.
Flurry is obviously a melee attack but it doesn't count as one, therefore it's bugged...
This is pretty much what I was getting at. Flurry is basically a weak version of jabs, so they should be able to proc the same sets
yes, but it will very likely get buffed with Elsweyr.
Atleast it slipped after the NDA was lifted, that FLurry should get a 20% dmg increase
sadly thats not enough, since its still not considered as meeledmg, and therefor cannot proc sets that require the dmg to be meele.
Furthermore the cost is still insane on this skill, it should be reduced by 20% aswell...then we might have a great skill once again.