Necromancer colossus ultimate = Vampire Lord form option.

BloodStorm

You can make tankyish werewolf and destroy pretty much solo anything PvP /World bosses and the fact Vampire was magicka based as all its skills are magicka was unfortunate. Finally we have a what looks like a melee form and I personally enjoy being somewhat tanky / tanky and just ulting and being a berserker playstyle and I assume Colossus / Bonelord appearance will have specific skills like werewolf does. I was hoping for a Volkihar bloodline as they are the most powerful vampires physically in lore and can dominate basically anything with brute force instead of magic as well. The Colossus form is getting me pumped again for PvP and PvE and can't wait. Hope people have other interesting ideas for the form as well.

KhajiitFelix

no

redlink1979

No.

Reistr_the_Unbroken

Yes because vampires need love

And a DLC, polymorph and a home like the WW got

Skwor

Vampires do not need love, they are the freaking end game meta for magic users already, good grief.

[Edited for non-constructive commentary]

Wihuri

wat

josiahva

vampires are already BIS for many magicka and even some stamina builds...werewolf I find rather useless....because I want to lose half my skills to use my ultimate...not

DeadlyRecluse

BloodStorm wrote: »

Vampire was magicka based ranged class

Vampire isn't a class, isn't solely linked to magicka, and isn't in any way based around ranged.

ShadowHvo

No.

exeeter702

Not that i entirely agree with the OPs idea. I really do thing a good monetiztion option they can take with eso is alternate ability skins or animations that you can equip.

We seen this already in a rather infantile form with the wardens bear where you can slot a different skin for it from the collections tab. Imagine if they added different styled skins for other abilites to further personalize your character. Similar to how POE does it.

Draxys

I just wish they would make bats good again. Especially invis bats, I'd be surprise if literally anyone uses it.

BloodStorm

DeadlyRecluse wrote: »

BloodStorm wrote: »

Vampire was magicka based ranged class

Vampire isn't a class, isn't solely linked to magicka, and isn't in any way based around ranged.

Typo on class but vampire is based around ranged/some tanks but it clearly leans heavily toward magicka builds. It's ultimate even does magic damage. Stamina builds are possible of course and agree but to say it doesn't lean heavily towards magicka is absurd

Mettaricana

Wonder how many player come chapter launch day are gonna make vampires and question where their necro skills are because of posts like this...

BloodStorm

Idunno but I love this game and play 8 hours a day on weekends probably especially. Just love the immersion and grinding with random people / messing around. In the end I always realize it's not my game and it's like your at a party and the host tries to be comforting but they have a lot to deal with / worry about and you gotta deal with what you can get or make the best out of what happens / experiences. Maybe an odd analogy for some but ya. Really glad we are getting Necromancer. Be it balanced, bad, or great I'm sure things will be fun

r34lian

Yes add to that magma armour and major berserk

Verbal_Earthworm

Nah

SpiderCultist

vampire lord polymorph if anything

Thannazzar

No

Rather have flesh atronach

IzzyStardust

Reistr_the_Unbroken wrote: »

Yes because vampires need love

And a DLC, polymorph and a home like the WW got

OMG a home

Siohwenoeht

Hate to be the lore nerd but vamp lord form is a distinct characteristic of the volkihar vamps only. It's a direct boon from molag bal himself and since he's still the main protagonist in eso, and Lamia bal is the giver of vampirism in ESO, hard no on this.

Aliyavana

nty. a form like that shouldn't be locked behind a class and curse combo

Noxavian

Skwor wrote: »

Vampires do not need love, they are the freaking end game meta for magic users already, good grief.

[Edited for non-constructive commentary]

And want to know /why/ they're the end game meta? Because of their passives.

Now call me crazy, but I don't exactly see "vampire is good just for passives" being a safe nice design. A SUBCLASS should not only be chosen for the passives. That is horrible game design. The fact that the only good thing about *vampires*, of all things, are the passives is backwards design at it's finest.

So the obvious answer to this is to nerf the passives and add 2 more skills to make the subclass have an actual bar's worth of ability options. OR Add in another vampire line for people who hey, guess what, want to play a vampire and actually use the spells provided by such without feeling limited.

Drakavyn_morelock

Siohwenoeht wrote: »

Hate to be the lore nerd but vamp lord form is a distinct characteristic of the volkihar vamps only. It's a direct boon from molag bal himself and since he's still the main protagonist in eso, and Lamia bal is the giver of vampirism in ESO, hard no on this.

I'm sure iv read other vampire lines had a similar thing to vampire lord, also they're is an ancient vampire in an Eastmarch quest line that transforms into a vampire lord. But it was a gargoyle skin

Drakavyn_morelock

I think a flesh atronach would be a better skin tho

starkerealm

Cirantille

I don't care, I am just a vampire because of RP reasons

They are lovely creatures...