Dexter51eb17_ESO wrote: »have seen a lot of same threads but there no comparisons in load times,and no videos in internet. so i want to know your ESO load times on SSD from cold start. here mine (OS on SSD,ESO on crappy 5400 SSD): from play button on clent till login/password screen-14 sec. from login till char select-51 sec. from char select till playing-1m40sec in rawl'ka/1min4sec in wilderness. (i7 4600hq 2,5ghz,8gb,gt 750m 4gb ddr3). so i'm interesting in your timings with ESO on SSD to understand worth it or not. will repeat-want to see here only timings,not just answers like "wirth it" or "no difference". Thank you.
Why do people think their local computer setup (SSD vs HDD) has any effect on server lag?
Why do people think their local computer setup (SSD vs HDD) has any effect on server lag?
Why do people think their local computer setup (SSD vs HDD) has any effect on server lag?
I don't think you understand how game loading works. Every time you start ESO, you aren't receiving GBs of textures from the ZOS servers, there is a reason ESO is about 92GB in total currently.
It works the exact same way as loading a singleplayer game, except there is small communication between the server and your PC about what textures need to be where which happens instantly.
The faster your PC can load textures, the shorter the loading times are.
omg you are killing the magic. :'(Merlin13KAGL wrote: »Most of your "Load screens" aren't about your drive. They're about the processor placing and making ready the 10,000 items that make up your current view of the game world at any given time.
You are correct about the textures but in reality there's no difference what drive you use in this game. My wife's PC is 3 years older than mine, alot weaker CPU, less and slower ram and HDD. My PC is next to hers, overclocked to 4.8 ghz, 2 SSDs in raid 0. My drive read speed is 10x faster but half the times she loads into zones and dungeons faster than me. My PC loads local data faster but then the server communications take most of the loading screen time and theres so many factors that can delay it.
SSD is definitely worth it in single player games and your boot times and OS is alot faster but dont expect any improvement in ESO.
I've just been thinking about buying an SSD to shorten load times in ESO and PUBG and this thread has made the decision for me. Can't afford a M.2 one at the moment but a regular SATA3 240gb should do the trick, or am I wrong?
Also while we're at it, what CPU seems to handle this game the best? Mine's AMD FX-8350 and it doesn't seem to be doing that great of a job since I sometimes get major FPS drops and way too long load times.
I've just been thinking about buying an SSD to shorten load times in ESO and PUBG and this thread has made the decision for me. Can't afford a M.2 one at the moment but a regular SATA3 240gb should do the trick, or am I wrong?
Also while we're at it, what CPU seems to handle this game the best? Mine's AMD FX-8350 and it doesn't seem to be doing that great of a job since I sometimes get major FPS drops and way too long load times.
The load times in ESO are NOT related to your HDD/SSD speed.
The load times in ESO are NOT related to your HDD/SSD speed.
They are related to 1# CPU speed, 2# Server responsiveness / business.
THE SSD/HDD Speeds are DIRECTLY related to the Texture rendering in the surroundings
Example: WITH HDD when teleporting to a new zone you will see a black character models or you wont see any at all and they will POP UP in time (depends on the userconfig settings).
My PC is not gonna load several gigabytes of textures faster because the server has 100ms faster responsiveness, people keep forgetting the loading screens are for loading the textures, same as any singleplayer games.