A couple years ago I would have, and did. During the past couple years it has become more clear that Zos is very inconsistent in how they manage the game which has driven some I know away.
That might change since Garrett has stated they are now working to "codifying our vision and long-term strategy for combat". My thought is finally after all these years. If they truly create a vision and stick to such ideals then we might begin to see something good come of it. If it is merely nothing more than empty words, as they have used the term "vision" before then we will see more of the same.
A couple years ago I would have, and did. During the past couple years it has become more clear that Zos is very inconsistent in how they manage the game which has driven some I know away.
That might change since Garrett has stated they are now working to "codifying our vision and long-term strategy for combat". My thought is finally after all these years. If they truly create a vision and stick to such ideals then we might begin to see something good come of it. If it is merely nothing more than empty words, as they have used the term "vision" before then we will see more of the same.
Vision and reality have two very different definitions.
Androconium wrote: »Was disabled, more like.
In before the lock goes on.
A couple years ago I would have, and did. During the past couple years it has become more clear that Zos is very inconsistent in how they manage the game which has driven some I know away.
That might change since Garrett has stated they are now working to "codifying our vision and long-term strategy for combat". My thought is finally after all these years. If they truly create a vision and stick to such ideals then we might begin to see something good come of it. If it is merely nothing more than empty words, as they have used the term "vision" before then we will see more of the same.