Sheezabeast wrote: »I would love this compromise! Especially if i could fluidly switch which guild was my active.
So essentially a hide tabbard?
Blackleopardex wrote: »
Blackleopardex wrote: »
And what happens to tabbards? A simple hide tabbard switch sounds a bit easier to implement.
Blackleopardex wrote: »
And what happens to tabbards? A simple hide tabbard switch sounds a bit easier to implement.
Blackleopardex wrote: »No, this is not another post about an option to hide the tabard, so hold your comments until you read my idea. So, as many of you know we can't represent the guild we wanna on our nameplates, without having the guild tabard destroy our awesome outfits. We use gold and much time to make our outfits just to have them broken, when we wanna represent a guild. My idea is to make a separate section next to our title, where the player can choose if and what guild the player wanna represent on the nameplate. I made a quick example of what it could look like:
Let me know what you guys think!
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***
Blackleopardex wrote: »According to zos apparently not. It has to do with the different layers armor/outfit/costume/tabard.. and apparently adding a hide option to the tabard is far more complicated then it seems.
Blackleopardex wrote: »To make the tabard slightly more important it could be required to have the tabard of the specific guild you wanna use in your inventory, to be able to show that guild.
Blackleopardex wrote: »According to zos apparently not. It has to do with the different layers armor/outfit/costume/tabard.. and apparently adding a hide option to the tabard is far more complicated then it seems.
I seriously doubt that's true. Costumes already hide the tabard, which means the code to make it not visible is already there. If the code is there, it would be easy enough to add a toggle to it.
Blackleopardex wrote: »To make the tabard slightly more important it could be required to have the tabard of the specific guild you wanna use in your inventory, to be able to show that guild.
This would certainly be more complicated than a toggle to make a worn tabard visible/invisible. If ZOS is truly avoiding the hide option due to it being far more complicated than it seems, they're not going to go for an even more complicated option.
The simplest route for such things is usually the best option.
I have to laugh at how OP starts off saying this is not another thread about hiding the guild tabard, but ends up explaining it is another thread about hiding the guild tabard since it is a idea to basically totally hide it, basically replace tabards with a different mechanism.
No offense, but that really is good. As for the suggestion or hiding tabards I do not care either way.
BTW, If Zos really wanted to make it so players could hide their tabard they could do it without creating an entire new system. As someone already pointed out costumes hide the tabard. It would probably be easier to just do a hide tabard toggle.
xenowarrior92eb17_ESO wrote: »
2 days = Necroposting?
Blackleopardex wrote: »BTW, If Zos really wanted to make it so players could hide their tabard they could do it without creating an entire new system. As someone already pointed out costumes hide the tabard. It would probably be easier to just do a hide tabard toggle.
If it was that easy it would already have been done.
Blackleopardex wrote: »BTW, If Zos really wanted to make it so players could hide their tabard they could do it without creating an entire new system. As someone already pointed out costumes hide the tabard. It would probably be easier to just do a hide tabard toggle.
If it was that easy it would already have been done.
You are assuming that Zos has given this significant consideration. Clearly this is not a hotbed issue to begin with considering the light response in this thread. Again, idc about the issue one way or another.
Blackleopardex wrote: »No, this is not another post about an option to hide the tabard, so hold your comments until you read my idea. So, as many of you know we can't represent the guild we wanna on our nameplates, without having the guild tabard destroy our awesome outfits. We use gold and much time to make our outfits just to have them broken, when we wanna represent a guild. My idea is to make a separate section next to our title, where the player can choose if and what guild the player wanna represent on the nameplate. I made a quick example of what it could look like:
Let me know what you guys think!
You are not the first one to say this.
BUT I AGREE!
seriously, the bare bone of the code are already there, since we can select titles from drop down menu. this would be an absolutely perfect solution. now Id rather not have to carry 5 different tabbards in my bags on every single character, just to be able to chose between guilds, but then again, its not like tabbards don't still have use for specific guild functions.
Blackleopardex wrote: »According to zos apparently not. It has to do with the different layers armor/outfit/costume/tabard.. and apparently adding a hide option to the tabard is far more complicated then it seems.
I seriously doubt that's true. Costumes already hide the tabard, which means the code to make it not visible is already there. If the code is there, it would be easy enough to add a toggle to it.Blackleopardex wrote: »To make the tabard slightly more important it could be required to have the tabard of the specific guild you wanna use in your inventory, to be able to show that guild.
This would certainly be more complicated than a toggle to make a worn tabard visible/invisible. If ZOS is truly avoiding the hide option due to it being far more complicated than it seems, they're not going to go for an even more complicated option.
The simplest route for such things is usually the best option.
Blackleopardex wrote: »
And what happens to tabbards? A simple hide tabbard switch sounds a bit easier to implement.
milaan_muc wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno Can you please add such an option? Thanks.
xenowarrior92eb17_ESO wrote: »