Shadowasrial wrote: »Over the years every class has had nerfs undesirable to them, and every time they cry about it it seems to fall on deaf ears. But now the sorcs finally had thier dues coming and they cried and instead of following through like they have with every other class they caved and gave in. This is unacceptable. Why should one class get special consideration over all the other classes receiving nerfs? Nb critical damage builds were nerfed into the grave and left to rot. You capped crit chance, nerfed crit from stealth and sneak damage bonuses. We have impen as the primary trait choice in pvp. And now there is even talk of nerfing speed as well as the already known dodge chance. When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed. All the while magic sets remain untouched. This is complete and utter favoritism. End rant
Maybe if we spent less time saying ZOS plays favourites or arguing about X vs Y and focused on providing clear feedback with evidence and no bias in the correct threads, we'd be listened to more often. Just a thought.
Also this was a change considered by many across the game as a bad change. Shields are still getting smacked down, just in a way more in line with expectations of how the game plays.
I don't think all the other balance changes were as controversial as this one though. Yes everyone's had buffs or nerfs, but none so drastically out of line with the expectations of the game as adding a cast time to a defensive skill (at least none I can recall).Shadowasrial wrote: »Maybe if we spent less time saying ZOS plays favourites or arguing about X vs Y and focused on providing clear feedback with evidence and no bias in the correct threads, we'd be listened to more often. Just a thought.
Also this was a change considered by many across the game as a bad change. Shields are still getting smacked down, just in a way more in line with expectations of how the game plays.
While I agree it is still a huge nerf to mag classes I’m more angry about the fact they caved about the cast time. Every other class has given loads of feedback about why thier class skill shouldn’t be nerfed and they never once retracted a nerf for the sake of feedback. This is a first and to be frank it’s not right that everyone else’s feedback was ignored over the years
The_Brosteen wrote: »Wild guess here, do you just so happen to play an archer stam nb?
Emma_Overload wrote: »No other class has EVER been nerfed as hard as Sorcerers.... over and over and over.
BalticBlues wrote: »
"I used to be an adventurer like you, then I lost my 3rd bar, Overload and Shield power."
I'll just leave this here.BalticBlues wrote: »Emma_Overload wrote: »No other class has EVER been nerfed as hard as Sorcerers.... over and over and over.
Unfotunately, yes, just a few examples:
- shields down to 6s
- streak costs rising with use (while Cloaking is not)
- frags lost CC
- Runecage dodgeable
- 3rd bar completely gone with next patch
- Overload light attack nerfed for -50%
- shields receiving crit damage with next patch
- shieldss capped at 40% with next patch
... shall I continue?
Even though the cast time is gone, the next patch still is crippling.
I don't think all the other balance changes were as controversial as this one though. Yes everyone's had buffs or nerfs, but none so drastically out of line with the expectations of the game as adding a cast time to a defensive skill (at least none I can recall).Shadowasrial wrote: »Maybe if we spent less time saying ZOS plays favourites or arguing about X vs Y and focused on providing clear feedback with evidence and no bias in the correct threads, we'd be listened to more often. Just a thought.
Also this was a change considered by many across the game as a bad change. Shields are still getting smacked down, just in a way more in line with expectations of how the game plays.
While I agree it is still a huge nerf to mag classes I’m more angry about the fact they caved about the cast time. Every other class has given loads of feedback about why thier class skill shouldn’t be nerfed and they never once retracted a nerf for the sake of feedback. This is a first and to be frank it’s not right that everyone else’s feedback was ignored over the years
Also things are different now in that we also have the class reps who could go to ZOS and make clear arguments as to why this wasn't a good change. In the past all ZOS had to work with was hyperbolic ranting on the forums.
They've changed their path on things in the past as well. This isn't the first time something has come out with X but become Y by the end of PTS.
Shadowasrial wrote: »Over the years every class has had nerfs undesirable to them, and every time they cry about it it seems to fall on deaf ears. But now the sorcs finally had thier dues coming and they cried and instead of following through like they have with every other class they caved and gave in. This is unacceptable. Why should one class get special consideration over all the other classes receiving nerfs? Nb critical damage builds were nerfed into the grave and left to rot. You capped crit chance, nerfed crit from stealth and sneak damage bonuses. We have impen as the primary trait choice in pvp. And now there is even talk of nerfing speed as well as the already known dodge chance. When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed. All the while magic sets remain untouched. This is complete and utter favoritism. End rant
Shadowasrial wrote: »Over the years every class has had nerfs undesirable to them, and every time they cry about it it seems to fall on deaf ears. But now the sorcs finally had thier dues coming and they cried and instead of following through like they have with every other class they caved and gave in. This is unacceptable. Why should one class get special consideration over all the other classes receiving nerfs? Nb critical damage builds were nerfed into the grave and left to rot. You capped crit chance, nerfed crit from stealth and sneak damage bonuses. We have impen as the primary trait choice in pvp. And now there is even talk of nerfing speed as well as the already known dodge chance. When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed. All the while magic sets remain untouched. This is complete and utter favoritism. End rant
usmguy1234 wrote: »Shadowasrial wrote: »Over the years every class has had nerfs undesirable to them, and every time they cry about it it seems to fall on deaf ears. But now the sorcs finally had thier dues coming and they cried and instead of following through like they have with every other class they caved and gave in. This is unacceptable. Why should one class get special consideration over all the other classes receiving nerfs? Nb critical damage builds were nerfed into the grave and left to rot. You capped crit chance, nerfed crit from stealth and sneak damage bonuses. We have impen as the primary trait choice in pvp. And now there is even talk of nerfing speed as well as the already known dodge chance. When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed. All the while magic sets remain untouched. This is complete and utter favoritism. End rant
A nightblade complaining about lack of favoritism... color me amused.
Shadowasrial wrote: »Over the years every class has had nerfs undesirable to them, and every time they cry about it it seems to fall on deaf ears. But now the sorcs finally had thier dues coming and they cried and instead of following through like they have with every other class they caved and gave in. This is unacceptable. Why should one class get special consideration over all the other classes receiving nerfs? Nb critical damage builds were nerfed into the grave and left to rot. You capped crit chance, nerfed crit from stealth and sneak damage bonuses. We have impen as the primary trait choice in pvp. And now there is even talk of nerfing speed as well as the already known dodge chance. When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed. All the while magic sets remain untouched. This is complete and utter favoritism. End rant
usmguy1234 wrote: »A nightblade complaining about lack of favoritism... color me amused.
A year ago everyone was saying the same about Sorcerer. ZOS changes their favouritism on a yearly basis it seems.Imperial_Voice wrote: »Right? ZoS favorite child mad that its sibling got a new toy.
Maybe this is a first. they listened to the community and the class leads. In the end their goal will still be accomplished by other means, but it won't affect the fluidity of combat as much. I play all classes and I rely on shields on many of them, so I am OK with the new proposed changes.Shadowasrial wrote: »While I agree it is still a huge nerf to mag classes I’m more angry about the fact they caved about the cast time. Every other class has given loads of feedback about why thier class skill shouldn’t be nerfed and they never once retracted a nerf for the sake of feedback. This is a first and to be frank it’s not right that everyone else’s feedback was ignored over the years
Shadowasrial wrote: »Maybe if we spent less time saying ZOS plays favourites or arguing about X vs Y and focused on providing clear feedback with evidence and no bias in the correct threads, we'd be listened to more often. Just a thought.
Also this was a change considered by many across the game as a bad change. Shields are still getting smacked down, just in a way more in line with expectations of how the game plays.
While I agree it is still a huge nerf to mag classes I’m more angry about the fact they caved about the cast time. Every other class has given loads of feedback about why thier class skill shouldn’t be nerfed and they never once retracted a nerf for the sake of feedback. This is a first and to be frank it’s not right that everyone else’s feedback was ignored over the years
Shadowasrial wrote: »Maybe if we spent less time saying ZOS plays favourites or arguing about X vs Y and focused on providing clear feedback with evidence and no bias in the correct threads, we'd be listened to more often. Just a thought.
Also this was a change considered by many across the game as a bad change. Shields are still getting smacked down, just in a way more in line with expectations of how the game plays.
While I agree it is still a huge nerf to mag classes I’m more angry about the fact they caved about the cast time. Every other class has given loads of feedback about why thier class skill shouldn’t be nerfed and they never once retracted a nerf for the sake of feedback. This is a first and to be frank it’s not right that everyone else’s feedback was ignored over the years
Shadowasrial wrote: »