Maintenance for the week of March 3:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – March 3
• NA megaservers for maintenance – March 5, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 11:00AM EST (16:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for maintenance – March 5, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 16:00 UTC (11:00AM EST)
• ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – March 6, 6:00AM EST (11:00 UTC) - 4:00PM EST (21:00 UTC)

Proof zos caters to sorcery over every other class.

Shadowasrial
Shadowasrial
✭✭✭✭✭
Over the years every class has had nerfs undesirable to them, and every time they cry about it it seems to fall on deaf ears. But now the sorcs finally had thier dues coming and they cried and instead of following through like they have with every other class they caved and gave in. This is unacceptable. Why should one class get special consideration over all the other classes receiving nerfs? Nb critical damage builds were nerfed into the grave and left to rot. You capped crit chance, nerfed crit from stealth and sneak damage bonuses. We have impen as the primary trait choice in pvp. And now there is even talk of nerfing speed as well as the already known dodge chance. When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed. All the while magic sets remain untouched. This is complete and utter favoritism. End rant
  • Turelus
    Turelus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe if we spent less time saying ZOS plays favourites or arguing about X vs Y and focused on providing clear feedback with evidence and no bias in the correct threads, we'd be listened to more often. Just a thought.

    Also this was a change considered by many across the game as a bad change. Shields are still getting smacked down, just in a way more in line with expectations of how the game plays.
    @Turelus - EU PC Megaserver
    "Don't count on others for help. In the end each of us is in this alone. The survivors are those who know how to look out for themselves."
  • Kadoin
    Kadoin
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Over the years every class has had nerfs undesirable to them, and every time they cry about it it seems to fall on deaf ears. But now the sorcs finally had thier dues coming and they cried and instead of following through like they have with every other class they caved and gave in. This is unacceptable. Why should one class get special consideration over all the other classes receiving nerfs? Nb critical damage builds were nerfed into the grave and left to rot. You capped crit chance, nerfed crit from stealth and sneak damage bonuses. We have impen as the primary trait choice in pvp. And now there is even talk of nerfing speed as well as the already known dodge chance. When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed. All the while magic sets remain untouched. This is complete and utter favoritism. End rant

    And what magic sets are those? Also, heard of absorb magic? It works well, really well.
    Edited by Kadoin on September 27, 2018 11:40AM
  • Daedric_NB_187
    Daedric_NB_187
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    El oh el
  • Anken5
    Anken5
    ✭✭✭
    The health cap is worst than the cast, so...
  • Shadowasrial
    Shadowasrial
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Turelus wrote: »
    Maybe if we spent less time saying ZOS plays favourites or arguing about X vs Y and focused on providing clear feedback with evidence and no bias in the correct threads, we'd be listened to more often. Just a thought.

    Also this was a change considered by many across the game as a bad change. Shields are still getting smacked down, just in a way more in line with expectations of how the game plays.

    While I agree it is still a huge nerf to mag classes I’m more angry about the fact they caved about the cast time. Every other class has given loads of feedback about why thier class skill shouldn’t be nerfed and they never once retracted a nerf for the sake of feedback. This is a first and to be frank it’s not right that everyone else’s feedback was ignored over the years
  • iiYuki
    iiYuki
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Shield changes affected all magicka light armour classes not just Sorcerers.
    "Play how you want... unless its not how we intended you to play in which case we'll nerf it".
    - ZO$

    - The ZO$ Theme Song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmUJWP_ebsQ
  • Shadowasrial
    Shadowasrial
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    iiYuki wrote: »
    Shield changes affected all magicka light armour classes not just Sorcerers.

    Yes but it was mostly the sorcs who cried the most and even in thier “discussion” they mentioned sorcs were the most affected by this and “unplayable”
  • Turelus
    Turelus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Turelus wrote: »
    Maybe if we spent less time saying ZOS plays favourites or arguing about X vs Y and focused on providing clear feedback with evidence and no bias in the correct threads, we'd be listened to more often. Just a thought.

    Also this was a change considered by many across the game as a bad change. Shields are still getting smacked down, just in a way more in line with expectations of how the game plays.

    While I agree it is still a huge nerf to mag classes I’m more angry about the fact they caved about the cast time. Every other class has given loads of feedback about why thier class skill shouldn’t be nerfed and they never once retracted a nerf for the sake of feedback. This is a first and to be frank it’s not right that everyone else’s feedback was ignored over the years
    I don't think all the other balance changes were as controversial as this one though. Yes everyone's had buffs or nerfs, but none so drastically out of line with the expectations of the game as adding a cast time to a defensive skill (at least none I can recall).

    Also things are different now in that we also have the class reps who could go to ZOS and make clear arguments as to why this wasn't a good change. In the past all ZOS had to work with was hyperbolic ranting on the forums.

    They've changed their path on things in the past as well. This isn't the first time something has come out with X but become Y by the end of PTS.
    @Turelus - EU PC Megaserver
    "Don't count on others for help. In the end each of us is in this alone. The survivors are those who know how to look out for themselves."
  • The_Brosteen
    The_Brosteen
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wild guess here, do you just so happen to play an archer stam nb?
  • Shadowasrial
    Shadowasrial
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wild guess here, do you just so happen to play an archer stam nb?

    No I play a dw 2h stam nb get it right
  • Reistr_the_Unbroken
    Reistr_the_Unbroken
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    This whole theme fits when everything is normal, then the forms explode in nerfs at the end and I’m not sure why
    🤔

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8QPEVQp1MZw
    Edit: to me at least it seems that way
    Edited by Reistr_the_Unbroken on September 27, 2018 11:47AM
  • Emma_Overload
    Emma_Overload
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No other class has EVER been nerfed as hard as Sorcerers.... over and over and over.
    #CAREBEARMASTERRACE
  • Morgul667
    Morgul667
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Even non sorc people acknowledge this was a bad change

    Nightbades are in a good spot.
  • The_Brosteen
    The_Brosteen
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I do like the "When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed."

    #makeprocsetsgreatagain amiright
  • HowlKimchi
    HowlKimchi
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Read up

    https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/437982/class-reps-meeting-notes-september-25/p1

    The revert of the cast time was because of the community and not ZOS.
    previously @HaruKamui but I outgrew my weeb phase (probably)

    PC/NA - EP - Howl Bragi/Howl Kimchi
  • BalticBlues
    BalticBlues
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    No other class has EVER been nerfed as hard as Sorcerers.... over and over and over.

    Unfotunately, yes, just a few examples:
    - shields down to 6s
    - streak costs rising with use (while Cloaking is not)
    - frags lost CC
    - Runecage dodgeable
    - 3rd bar completely removed next patch
    - Overload light attack nerfed -50% next patch
    - shields receiving crit damage next patch
    - shields capped at 40% HP next patch
    ... shall I continue? The next patch still is crippling.

    In PvP, from now on I will only play my NB, even though I find Cloak to be (ch)easymode.
    And my Sorc? Is becoming...
    651-1.jpg
    "I used to be an adventurer like you, then I lost my 3rd bar, Overload and Shield power."


    Edited by BalticBlues on September 27, 2018 12:03PM
  • Turelus
    Turelus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No other class has EVER been nerfed as hard as Sorcerers.... over and over and over.

    Unfotunately, yes, just a few examples:
    - shields down to 6s
    - streak costs rising with use (while Cloaking is not)
    - frags lost CC
    - Runecage dodgeable
    - 3rd bar completely gone with next patch
    - Overload light attack nerfed for -50%
    - shields receiving crit damage with next patch
    - shieldss capped at 40% with next patch

    ... shall I continue?
    Even though the cast time is gone, the next patch still is crippling.
    I'll just leave this here. :tongue:

    @Turelus - EU PC Megaserver
    "Don't count on others for help. In the end each of us is in this alone. The survivors are those who know how to look out for themselves."
  • GallantGuardian
    GallantGuardian
    ✭✭✭✭
    Turelus wrote: »
    Turelus wrote: »
    Maybe if we spent less time saying ZOS plays favourites or arguing about X vs Y and focused on providing clear feedback with evidence and no bias in the correct threads, we'd be listened to more often. Just a thought.

    Also this was a change considered by many across the game as a bad change. Shields are still getting smacked down, just in a way more in line with expectations of how the game plays.

    While I agree it is still a huge nerf to mag classes I’m more angry about the fact they caved about the cast time. Every other class has given loads of feedback about why thier class skill shouldn’t be nerfed and they never once retracted a nerf for the sake of feedback. This is a first and to be frank it’s not right that everyone else’s feedback was ignored over the years
    I don't think all the other balance changes were as controversial as this one though. Yes everyone's had buffs or nerfs, but none so drastically out of line with the expectations of the game as adding a cast time to a defensive skill (at least none I can recall).

    Also things are different now in that we also have the class reps who could go to ZOS and make clear arguments as to why this wasn't a good change. In the past all ZOS had to work with was hyperbolic ranting on the forums.

    They've changed their path on things in the past as well. This isn't the first time something has come out with X but become Y by the end of PTS.

    Repentance .... that was pretty controversial ... no other class has ever had to fight for sustain
  • Lord_Eomer
    Lord_Eomer
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Over the years every class has had nerfs undesirable to them, and every time they cry about it it seems to fall on deaf ears. But now the sorcs finally had thier dues coming and they cried and instead of following through like they have with every other class they caved and gave in. This is unacceptable. Why should one class get special consideration over all the other classes receiving nerfs? Nb critical damage builds were nerfed into the grave and left to rot. You capped crit chance, nerfed crit from stealth and sneak damage bonuses. We have impen as the primary trait choice in pvp. And now there is even talk of nerfing speed as well as the already known dodge chance. When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed. All the while magic sets remain untouched. This is complete and utter favoritism. End rant

    Sorc took only nerf since last year and are you still complaining about sorc?

    This class is going to be weakest anyway!
    Edited by Lord_Eomer on September 27, 2018 12:40PM
  • usmguy1234
    usmguy1234
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Over the years every class has had nerfs undesirable to them, and every time they cry about it it seems to fall on deaf ears. But now the sorcs finally had thier dues coming and they cried and instead of following through like they have with every other class they caved and gave in. This is unacceptable. Why should one class get special consideration over all the other classes receiving nerfs? Nb critical damage builds were nerfed into the grave and left to rot. You capped crit chance, nerfed crit from stealth and sneak damage bonuses. We have impen as the primary trait choice in pvp. And now there is even talk of nerfing speed as well as the already known dodge chance. When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed. All the while magic sets remain untouched. This is complete and utter favoritism. End rant

    A nightblade complaining about lack of favoritism... color me amused.
    Zaghigoth- Orc Stamplar
    Soul Razor- Altmer Magsorc
    Les Drago- Redguard Stamdk
    Eirius- Altmer Magdk
    Stormifeth- Altmer Magplar

    Disclaimer: My comments are a little sarcasm mixed with truth. If you can't handle that don't respond to me.

  • Imperial_Voice
    Imperial_Voice
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    usmguy1234 wrote: »
    Over the years every class has had nerfs undesirable to them, and every time they cry about it it seems to fall on deaf ears. But now the sorcs finally had thier dues coming and they cried and instead of following through like they have with every other class they caved and gave in. This is unacceptable. Why should one class get special consideration over all the other classes receiving nerfs? Nb critical damage builds were nerfed into the grave and left to rot. You capped crit chance, nerfed crit from stealth and sneak damage bonuses. We have impen as the primary trait choice in pvp. And now there is even talk of nerfing speed as well as the already known dodge chance. When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed. All the while magic sets remain untouched. This is complete and utter favoritism. End rant

    A nightblade complaining about lack of favoritism... color me amused.

    Right? ZoS favorite child mad that its sibling got a new toy.
  • Fleshreaper
    Fleshreaper
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Over the years every class has had nerfs undesirable to them, and every time they cry about it it seems to fall on deaf ears. But now the sorcs finally had thier dues coming and they cried and instead of following through like they have with every other class they caved and gave in. This is unacceptable. Why should one class get special consideration over all the other classes receiving nerfs? Nb critical damage builds were nerfed into the grave and left to rot. You capped crit chance, nerfed crit from stealth and sneak damage bonuses. We have impen as the primary trait choice in pvp. And now there is even talk of nerfing speed as well as the already known dodge chance. When ever a stam class gets an armor set that can effectively kill a shield stacking mag sorc it gets nerfed. All the while magic sets remain untouched. This is complete and utter favoritism. End rant

    I hear ya, I do and I mostly agree. However, something to think about. When trying to find out what works and what does not work, you must first have a control subject. This just happens to be the sorc. ZOS uses the sorc as the base line and nerfs and/or buffs around the death to kill ratio. We the players do not have these numbers and we just have to "trust" ZOS to be fair. With this in mind, it's clear that sorcs are focus and I believe that is why they will always be a little more over powered then any other class.
  • Turelus
    Turelus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    usmguy1234 wrote: »
    A nightblade complaining about lack of favoritism... color me amused.
    Right? ZoS favorite child mad that its sibling got a new toy.
    A year ago everyone was saying the same about Sorcerer. ZOS changes their favouritism on a yearly basis it seems. :tongue:
    @Turelus - EU PC Megaserver
    "Don't count on others for help. In the end each of us is in this alone. The survivors are those who know how to look out for themselves."
  • Malyck
    Malyck
    ✭✭✭
    While I agree it is still a huge nerf to mag classes I’m more angry about the fact they caved about the cast time. Every other class has given loads of feedback about why thier class skill shouldn’t be nerfed and they never once retracted a nerf for the sake of feedback. This is a first and to be frank it’s not right that everyone else’s feedback was ignored over the years
    Maybe this is a first. they listened to the community and the class leads. In the end their goal will still be accomplished by other means, but it won't affect the fluidity of combat as much. I play all classes and I rely on shields on many of them, so I am OK with the new proposed changes.

    I applaud ZOS for listening and making compromises on this change. Hopefully this can lead the way forward on future changes.



  • pod88kk
    pod88kk
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    The stamina version of each class hits harder than it's magicka version soooooo
  • visionality
    visionality
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Turelus wrote: »
    Maybe if we spent less time saying ZOS plays favourites or arguing about X vs Y and focused on providing clear feedback with evidence and no bias in the correct threads, we'd be listened to more often. Just a thought.

    Also this was a change considered by many across the game as a bad change. Shields are still getting smacked down, just in a way more in line with expectations of how the game plays.

    While I agree it is still a huge nerf to mag classes I’m more angry about the fact they caved about the cast time. Every other class has given loads of feedback about why thier class skill shouldn’t be nerfed and they never once retracted a nerf for the sake of feedback. This is a first and to be frank it’s not right that everyone else’s feedback was ignored over the years

    Sorcs have been nerfed continuously over the last 12 monts, and the only tradeoff buff - rune cage unavoidable in exchange for the nerf of crystal frags - has been turned into a double-nerf within 12 weeks. So claiming sorcs would get special treatment by ZOS is just outright wrong. More telling might be the fact that a massive number of ppl have canceled their subscriptions since the sheld-nerf was published. ZOS hopes to give them the illusion they have listend to their anger and their arguments while in fact shields still are completely gutted, at least for PVP.

    And on a side note: Complaining that one toxic nerf has been exchanged for another toxic nerf for a class you clearly despise is a sign of pathetic social and empathic abilities.
  • Hymzir
    Hymzir
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Turelus wrote: »
    Maybe if we spent less time saying ZOS plays favourites or arguing about X vs Y and focused on providing clear feedback with evidence and no bias in the correct threads, we'd be listened to more often. Just a thought.

    Also this was a change considered by many across the game as a bad change. Shields are still getting smacked down, just in a way more in line with expectations of how the game plays.

    While I agree it is still a huge nerf to mag classes I’m more angry about the fact they caved about the cast time. Every other class has given loads of feedback about why thier class skill shouldn’t be nerfed and they never once retracted a nerf for the sake of feedback. This is a first and to be frank it’s not right that everyone else’s feedback was ignored over the years

    It's actually not the first time they retracted a nerf due to community feedback... Remember when they wanted to nerf Haunting Curse? Sorcs were angry and made a lot of noise about it. In the end, not only was the nerf reverted, they ended up buffing Haunting Curse. So at least they didn't buff shields this time.

    For a long long time, the general mood on the forums was that everyone over at ZOS played Sorcs and only Sorcs, 'cause they were never nerfed and only buffed. That was, of course, before the rise of the Nightblades, and after the fall of Vampire DKs. I still remember way back when NBs were a joke class, and how ridiculously OP DKs were at launch.

    But it is true, that Sorcs have never had to deal with class destroying nerfs, the kind that force you to not only change your build and gear, but your playstyle as well. And that is why I think people put up such a clamor about the cast time. People, who have mostly played other classes since launch, have had to re-invent their builds and playstyles several times, so they are used to it. Sorcs have been mostly spared from this, and while there have been small diversions as stuff got changed, nerfed and buffed over the years, the core playstyle of the sorc has been the same for the past 4 years. Cast time on shields would have been the end of that.

    Anyway, on topic, I like to think, that the reason, they caved in on the cast time, was due to the Class Rep thing. That things went differently this time because there was a way for the community to get through to the devs, and not due to Sorc favoritism. Hopefully, they will listen to the reps in future too, about any similarly disliked changes about to hit some other class.
  • Haashhtaag
    Haashhtaag
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    iiYuki wrote: »
    Shield changes affected all magicka light armour classes not just Sorcerers.

    Yes but it was mostly the sorcs who cried the most and even in thier “discussion” they mentioned sorcs were the most affected by this and “unplayable”

    I would say all LA characters complained but sorcs being the most effected brought out more.
  • Yellow_Monolith
    Yellow_Monolith
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I wish Zos would do something about the state of Mag warden.
  • Kuramas9tails
    Kuramas9tails
    ✭✭✭✭✭
      Your friendly neighborhood crazy cat lady of ESO
      New PSN name: SundariTheLast. Proud seller in RedEye Empire, PURPLE GANG and Backalley Trading.
      AD High Elf Mageblade DPS (General)(Former Empress) -- Stormproof/VMOL, VHOF, VDSA completion
      AD Khajiit Mageblade DPS -- Flawless Conquerer
      FOR THE QUEEN!
      PS4/NA
    This discussion has been closed.