LeifErickson wrote: »You lose a ton of damage going Argonian. There is only certain builds where I think it's worth the damage loss.
LeifErickson wrote: »You lose a ton of damage going Argonian. There is only certain builds where I think it's worth the damage loss.
usmguy1234 wrote: »Argonians perform better than other classes?
usmguy1234 wrote: »Argonians perform better than other classes?
Argonian is not the class.
It’s BiS for all magicka except sorc imo. It’s a very strong package of sustain and healing. The off stat sustain especially is so desirable. Other races get more damage, yes. But damage is also easy to build for. I don’t think it necessarily needs a nerf though. Orc is equally overpowered in a PvP environment relative to other stam races, but the game isn’t just about PvP and these races need a place to shine.
CatchMeTrolling wrote: »
CatchMeTrolling wrote: »
The fact that I can go from 0-100 on all my resources (HP, mag and stam) with a tri-pot in PvP shows how un-balanced it is.
usmguy1234 wrote: »For those saying that you give up a lot of burst as argonian, I've seen a few argonian magblade/stamblade builds and they can be built super bursty with disgusting survivability.
usmguy1234 wrote: »For those saying that you give up a lot of burst as argonian, I've seen a few argonian magblade/stamblade builds and they can be built super bursty with disgusting survivability.
That's more a function of nightblade than argonian.
usmguy1234 wrote: »usmguy1234 wrote: »For those saying that you give up a lot of burst as argonian, I've seen a few argonian magblade/stamblade builds and they can be built super bursty with disgusting survivability.
That's more a function of nightblade than argonian.
Right but saying argonians can't stack damage and hit really hard while remaining tanky is misleading.
LeifErickson wrote: »The only thing Argonians have better than others is the off stat sustain. A player can get more mag regen out of high elf if they are sitting at somewhere around 2k regen (can't remember the exact number) but the Argonian will have better stam sustain than the high elf. But the high elf gets way more magicka and the elemental damage passive. Seems pretty balanced to me.
If Argonian got nerfed I would race change immediately.
usmguy1234 wrote: »LeifErickson wrote: »The only thing Argonians have better than others is the off stat sustain. A player can get more mag regen out of high elf if they are sitting at somewhere around 2k regen (can't remember the exact number) but the Argonian will have better stam sustain than the high elf. But the high elf gets way more magicka and the elemental damage passive. Seems pretty balanced to me.
If Argonian got nerfed I would race change immediately.
In a pvp sense sustain is everything. If you can sustain with only potions this allows you to stack fully in to damage. The reason the other races out perform argonians in pve is because sustain isn't such an issue. That 2k regen that my altmer has doesn't mean anything when I'm getting blasted with cost poisons and getting cc'd continuously.
IZZEFlameLash wrote: »usmguy1234 wrote: »LeifErickson wrote: »The only thing Argonians have better than others is the off stat sustain. A player can get more mag regen out of high elf if they are sitting at somewhere around 2k regen (can't remember the exact number) but the Argonian will have better stam sustain than the high elf. But the high elf gets way more magicka and the elemental damage passive. Seems pretty balanced to me.
If Argonian got nerfed I would race change immediately.
In a pvp sense sustain is everything. If you can sustain with only potions this allows you to stack fully in to damage. The reason the other races out perform argonians in pve is because sustain isn't such an issue. That 2k regen that my altmer has doesn't mean anything when I'm getting blasted with cost poisons and getting cc'd continuously.
Argonians also get affected by cost poisons. Cost poisons affect everyone.