But but I like pineapples on pizza foreal @Aliyavana
But but I like pineapples on pizza foreal @Aliyavana
then use sloads shamelessly
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »But but I like pineapples on pizza foreal @Aliyavana
then use sloads shamelessly
Sload's was never much of an issue, even in the battlegrounds. lol
Stop trying to guilt people into playing their game how you want.
Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
yet you praised zos the second sloads was nerfed to not go through stealth. If you never had trouble with sloads you wouldn't have made that thread
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
yet you praised zos the second sloads was nerfed to not go through stealth. If you never had trouble with sloads you wouldn't have made that thread about a change that greatly benefits nightblades.
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
yet you praised zos the second sloads was nerfed to not go through stealth. If you never had trouble with sloads you wouldn't have made that thread
Sload's breaking stealth was the only issue I had with the set, and a minor one at that.
Now that that's gone, the damage stacking is the only thing you're complaining about anymore, and if you're fighting enough people that you die from their stacked Sload's procs alone, you were dead whether they had that set or not.
I've yet to meet this fabled Zerg of Sload, and I believe as a lowly Tribune, I can at least brag about that. Both Cyrodiil and the BGs, as a predominant magsorc, stam sorc, magblade, stamblade, magDK, and stamplar player, I can count on one hand how many times Sloads alone has killed me when I wasn't being careless and goofing off. (It's once, my first encounter with it.)
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
yet you praised zos the second sloads was nerfed to not go through stealth. If you never had trouble with sloads you wouldn't have made that thread about a change that greatly benefits nightblades.
everything in your comment is backwards.
i made a thread thanking zenimax that sloads no longer pulls people out of stealth,
not allowing us to stealth from a D.O.T. is not intended, and the devs commented saying that clearly was never intended.
the damage of sloads is weak, it needs damage buff or it's not worth wearing.
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
yet you praised zos the second sloads was nerfed to not go through stealth. If you never had trouble with sloads you wouldn't have made that thread
Sload's breaking stealth was the only issue I had with the set, and a minor one at that.
Now that that's gone, the damage stacking is the only thing you're complaining about anymore, and if you're fighting enough people that you die from their stacked Sload's procs alone, you were dead whether they had that set or not.
I've yet to meet this fabled Zerg of Sload, and I believe as a lowly Tribune, I can at least brag about that. Both Cyrodiil and the BGs, as a predominant magsorc, stam sorc, magblade, stamblade, magDK, and stamplar player, I can count on one hand how many times Sloads alone has killed me when I wasn't being careless and goofing off. (It's once, my first encounter with it.)
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
yet you praised zos the second sloads was nerfed to not go through stealth. If you never had trouble with sloads you wouldn't have made that thread about a change that greatly benefits nightblades.
everything in your comment is backwards.
i made a thread thanking zenimax that sloads no longer pulls people out of stealth,
not allowing us to stealth from a D.O.T. is not intended, and the devs commented saying that clearly was never intended.
the damage of sloads is weak, it needs damage buff or it's not worth wearing.
hehe, sloads totally needs a damage buff and is a totally non broken unmitigable set
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »dwemer_paleologist wrote: »dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
yet you praised zos the second sloads was nerfed to not go through stealth. If you never had trouble with sloads you wouldn't have made that thread about a change that greatly benefits nightblades.
everything in your comment is backwards.
i made a thread thanking zenimax that sloads no longer pulls people out of stealth,
not allowing us to stealth from a D.O.T. is not intended, and the devs commented saying that clearly was never intended.
the damage of sloads is weak, it needs damage buff or it's not worth wearing.
hehe, sloads totally needs a damage buff and is a totally non broken unmitigable set
You heard it here first. Aliyavana endorses Sload's.
Archived.
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
yet you praised zos the second sloads was nerfed to not go through stealth. If you never had trouble with sloads you wouldn't have made that thread
Sload's breaking stealth was the only issue I had with the set, and a minor one at that.
Now that that's gone, the damage stacking is the only thing you're complaining about anymore, and if you're fighting enough people that you die from their stacked Sload's procs alone, you were dead whether they had that set or not.
I've yet to meet this fabled Zerg of Sload, and I believe as a lowly Tribune, I can at least brag about that. Both Cyrodiil and the BGs, as a predominant magsorc, stam sorc, magblade, stamblade, magDK, and stamplar player, I can count on one hand how many times Sloads alone has killed me when I wasn't being careless and goofing off. (It's once, my first encounter with it.)
are you a templar?
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »dwemer_paleologist wrote: »dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
yet you praised zos the second sloads was nerfed to not go through stealth. If you never had trouble with sloads you wouldn't have made that thread about a change that greatly benefits nightblades.
everything in your comment is backwards.
i made a thread thanking zenimax that sloads no longer pulls people out of stealth,
not allowing us to stealth from a D.O.T. is not intended, and the devs commented saying that clearly was never intended.
the damage of sloads is weak, it needs damage buff or it's not worth wearing.
hehe, sloads totally needs a damage buff and is a totally non broken unmitigable set
You heard it here first. Aliyavana endorses Sload's.
Archived.
IndyWendieGo wrote: »Judas Helviaryn wrote: »dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
yet you praised zos the second sloads was nerfed to not go through stealth. If you never had trouble with sloads you wouldn't have made that thread
Sload's breaking stealth was the only issue I had with the set, and a minor one at that.
Now that that's gone, the damage stacking is the only thing you're complaining about anymore, and if you're fighting enough people that you die from their stacked Sload's procs alone, you were dead whether they had that set or not.
I've yet to meet this fabled Zerg of Sload, and I believe as a lowly Tribune, I can at least brag about that. Both Cyrodiil and the BGs, as a predominant magsorc, stam sorc, magblade, stamblade, magDK, and stamplar player, I can count on one hand how many times Sloads alone has killed me when I wasn't being careless and goofing off. (It's once, my first encounter with it.)
My question is;
Does anyone still slot purge? No?
Oh. Oh well.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »IndyWendieGo wrote: »Judas Helviaryn wrote: »dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sloads was never a problem.
However, since sloads was nerfed into the ground, now people are having a problem finding an excuse for losing.
exactly, Well Said.
myself, i have never even died to sloads, it's damage was weak, but now it's even weaker.
if anything, sloads should get a buff, so it's a decent damage dealing set, but untill that happens its not really worth wearing.
yet you praised zos the second sloads was nerfed to not go through stealth. If you never had trouble with sloads you wouldn't have made that thread
Sload's breaking stealth was the only issue I had with the set, and a minor one at that.
Now that that's gone, the damage stacking is the only thing you're complaining about anymore, and if you're fighting enough people that you die from their stacked Sload's procs alone, you were dead whether they had that set or not.
I've yet to meet this fabled Zerg of Sload, and I believe as a lowly Tribune, I can at least brag about that. Both Cyrodiil and the BGs, as a predominant magsorc, stam sorc, magblade, stamblade, magDK, and stamplar player, I can count on one hand how many times Sloads alone has killed me when I wasn't being careless and goofing off. (It's once, my first encounter with it.)
My question is;
Does anyone still slot purge? No?
Oh. Oh well.
i have purge on my front bar and i have allways had purge on my bar, the main reason was from D.O.T.s like poisens as well as the stupid exploision thing from sorcs, you can remove things and keep yourself in good health if you purge stuff, it can win fights for you.
sloads can and will remove if you purge.
but if your fighting multiple people then you will die just like @Judas Helviaryn said:
quote:
"the damage stacking is the only thing you're complaining about anymore, and if you're fighting enough people that you die from their stacked Sload's procs alone, you were dead whether they had that set or not."
end quote:
and he's Right, it doesnt matter what the group attacking you is wearing, sloads or not your gona die from too much damage.
it's normal, happens to all of us.