MIDYEAR MAYHEM (Great time to test a "ALLIANCE LOCKED" Server

Crom_CCCXVI

Last year you added about 4 or 5 new servers if I remember for the population increase...
For once can you do something for your serious PvPers and make a server one alliance per account. (like the game used to be)

Every weekend in PvP at some point we start talking about "trans-factionals", how the game was more intense and fun when you actually knew who the bad guys were-- and now you kill someone on a different alliance, then 5 minutes later he is standing beside you are talking junk in zone chat..

If it fail miserably just delete the server with the rest of the extra ones, if it is full and the most busy, like I know it will be, consider keeping it

Runs

Would like to see this too.

Moonsorrow

Would like to see a server like this for sure.

Right now its already at the point often that if one alliance is dominating then many just go switch alliance making it even more dominating, resulting in less fun pvp for everyone. Well unless someone feels its fun to have almost all players at 1 alliance, whole map that color 24/7 and nothing to do in the end when no enemies even bother to try anymore.

KingMagaw

What is wrong with paying for a service and waiting 3 hours to use it?

Takes-No-Prisoner

KingMagaw wrote: »

What is wrong with paying for a service and waiting 3 hours to use it?

I have seen close to 600 on PS4 NA during last year.

KingMagaw

Takes-No-Prisoner wrote: »

KingMagaw wrote: »

What is wrong with paying for a service and waiting 3 hours to use it?

I have seen close to 600 on PS4 NA during last year.

Good for you. I hope you continue to play and especially donate to be able to be stuck in a queue like last year

Takes-No-Prisoner

KingMagaw wrote: »

Takes-No-Prisoner wrote: »

KingMagaw wrote: »

What is wrong with paying for a service and waiting 3 hours to use it?

I have seen close to 600 on PS4 NA during last year.

Good for you. I hope you continue to play and especially donate to be able to be stuck in a queue like last year

I'm just pointing out that 300 que is baby que compared to the monster we saw last year.

Beamer_Miasma

Indeed, together with the expected steam login issues, the frequent crashing, the 5 second bar swap and skill lag, the disappearing scenery and server timeouts on random rolls due to server overload and the general lag conditions caused by twice the regular number of daily logins, an untested server change is exactly what we need to make this event successful!

Kingslayer513

Pretty good idea, but it makes too much sense so it probably won't happen.

Katahdin

It will just be dominated by EP just like Vivec and people will just make that their EP server so nothing will change

ArchMikem

lol i saw a player like this just last night. Talking crap in chat but then minutes later rides by on his Yellow with friends, reking me in the process. Then after twenty minutes comes back on his red to throw in chat again.

These Campaigns need to be Alliance restricted so badly but ZOS wont do it.

Aesthier

uh....no.

Runs

Aesthier wrote: »

uh....no.

Why no? You wouldn't have to use that campaign if they added it.

TequilaFire

Transfactionals are way out of hand.
But they are of course the ones that scream no.
Would stop their fun of handing the scroll to their friends and turning my siege around when I heal.