Cp or No Cp Cyrodil?

Aliyavana

What do you prefer and why? But none of this "NO CP/CP is where the real pvpers are at!" Personally I like no cp better as the gap is smaller between new players and vets as the only thing the things that separate me from a fresh cp turned noob is only 150 cps and gear along with experience. Also time to kill is a lot faster in no cp.

Judas Helviaryn

Cp

CP campaigns allow for more build variety, higher tolerances, more limits to reach and surpass, and generally allows for more functional edge builds to create and destroy.

Counterplay is the name of the game, you adapt quick, or you die quicker. That means "unkillable" tanks too. If you play the meta in a CP campaign, you will get bored quick.

Emma_Overload

Cp

Shields are too small in No-CP, so fighting outnumbered is a death sentence.

MalcolM24

Cp

Decent solo play in no cp is impossible.

RaddlemanNumber7

Cp

I've got them, I use them.

Arthg

No Cp

I like things the hard way.

Ectheliontnacil

Cp

I like them max stats on my magblade! Also a good cp layout gives you a sizeable advantage over ppl who don't know how to distribute cp, it adds another layer of build optimization.

Leeched

Depends on my mood

I play both but I prefer noCP. I mostly go to Vivec when there is too much zerg going on in Sotha and I am solo. With cp its just way more easy to fight outnumbered than in Sotha.

Jierdanit

Other : NonVet

alainjbrennanb16_ESO

No Cp

non cp to me its more down to player skill and gear set up no relying on cp points

dennissomb16_ESO

Cp

CP for me as it is the only campaign that has a semblance of population balance (although that has steadily been getting worse over time)

DRAGON_KILLER_HUNTER

No Cp

sotha sil is awesome, much more fun than vivec and lot less laggy

Aliyavana

No Cp

DRAGON_KILLER_HUNTER wrote: »

sotha sil is awesome, much more fun than vivec and lot less laggy

a lot less laggy than vivec indeed

Kelces

Depends on my mood

But mostly non CP

Pink_Violinz

Cp

No cp butchers pretty much every build I have. If battlegrounds were CP I'd actually play them.

Heimpai

No Cp

No cp cuz my cp isn’t high enough and i won’t be fodder for maxed cp

AlienatedGoat

Neither. PvP sucks.

Gnortranermara

I prefer combat in non-CP, but there's very little population in non-CP Cyrodiil. Battlegrounds is perfect.

frostz417

Cp

CP is defensively unbalanced kinda.
Non CP is extremely offensively unbalanced. No CP BG’s is absolute cancer with all the proc sets that aren’t easily countered like in cp. Plus it’s even worse for mag since you have almost no stam so you break free twice and you’re done for. Also. Nothing better than hitting 6k vigor’s while being hit with sloads/caldrons legacy cancer sets.

Fiktius

Cp

I'm used to have longer fights, my entire playstyle is build around it. I'm also used to that my enemies are able to take hits and stand longer.
Every time when I go to play at non CP campaigns, I often drop my combo on enemy and when they die, I feel like:
"Oh, you died already? Now that's almost disappointment."

WillhelmBlack

No Cp

Emma_Overload wrote: »

Shields are too small in No-CP, so fighting outnumbered is a death sentence.

This is just one the reasons I prefer no CP. No unkillable builds. It's the reason a lot are put off by it.

If damage was brought down a touch overall and proc sets disabled, no CP would be perfect and I'd play ESO way more. But the game is balanced with Crutch Points and is the reason the game is a mess compared to how it was before CP.

RDMyers65b14_ESO

Cp

There is a very easy way to confirm the most popular server CP or no CP. Wait for prime time tonight and ask which one has the queue.

Deep_01

No Cp

Due to lags

RedRook

Cp

I like the even playing field of non-CP PVP, but it just creates different problems - damaging proc sets in particular are crazily overtuned for non-CP. Switching back and forth is also a pain in the ***, they're more different than same, at least for me.

Edited to redact swears

Chrysa1is

There are campaigns with cp and campaigns without.

phillyproduct

No Cp

I just wish ps4 no cp actually had people in it

Stovahkiin

No Cp

No-CP PvP is infinitely better than the cesspool of unkillable builds known as CP Campaigns.

Phage wrote: »

Neither. PvP sucks.

If one of us said that about PVE, then all of you PVE kids would run in and complain, “Wow, see, look how toxic pvp players are!”

JamieAubrey

Cp

I can't really vote since I've never done No CP but CP all the way

Zeytio

Depends on my mood

I would play non cp more but shields are sooo bad without cp to contribute to them. But for stam toons non cp is very fun with a small group.

Katahdin

Cp

Don't know if this is some veiled attempt to get CP eliminated in favor of your preference, but this has been asked before....numerous times.
It was overwhelmingly in favor of CP.

In any case, a poll here where probably the majority of the playerbase never sees it will not be a good representation.


Considering the only consistently pop locked campaign is CP, and the next busiest one is also CP would indicate that CP is preferred.

There are both so there is a choice. I support having a choice so people can play what they want. There are people that play no-CP, but it will never be as busy as Vivec CP except perhaps during midyear mayhem

SirSocke

No Cp

No CP, because I've optimized my CP for PvE and don't want to switch them every time.