ezeepeezee wrote: »If you mean it proc'd and did its ~850 damage 6 times in a single GCD, well, I doubt that, but if that's the case then it's not working as intended.
Probably what you're seeing is Sload's in your recap with an x6 next to it, meaning it proc'd one time and you took all 6 ticks of its damage over time effect.
DuskMarine wrote: »
Ragnarock41 wrote: »DuskMarine wrote: »
It would take 36 seconds for this set to proc 6 times in a row. Your entire thread just shows how much you DON'T know about the game, you think you saw sloads 6 times because its a dot that does damage 6 times over 6 seconds.
And saying this set is worse than viper? Now thats rich. You can outheal sloads. Its not even as strong as a regular bleed. When viper was meta , stamblades were murdering people so fast that they were getting killed before even falling down from their horses.
DuskMarine wrote: »Ragnarock41 wrote: »DuskMarine wrote: »
It would take 36 seconds for this set to proc 6 times in a row. Your entire thread just shows how much you DON'T know about the game, you think you saw sloads 6 times because its a dot that does damage 6 times over 6 seconds.
And saying this set is worse than viper? Now thats rich. You can outheal sloads. Its not even as strong as a regular bleed. When viper was meta , stamblades were murdering people so fast that they were getting killed before even falling down from their horses.
so a death recap with sloads popping up that many seperate times(not ticks genius) there isnt something wrong with that set?? that makes sense. a set as broken as that pieace of junk youll defend it till it tears you apart and breaks like it did to me
DuskMarine wrote: »Ragnarock41 wrote: »DuskMarine wrote: »
It would take 36 seconds for this set to proc 6 times in a row. Your entire thread just shows how much you DON'T know about the game, you think you saw sloads 6 times because its a dot that does damage 6 times over 6 seconds.
And saying this set is worse than viper? Now thats rich. You can outheal sloads. Its not even as strong as a regular bleed. When viper was meta , stamblades were murdering people so fast that they were getting killed before even falling down from their horses.
so a death recap with sloads popping up that many seperate times(not ticks genius) there isnt something wrong with that set?? that makes sense. a set as broken as that pieace of junk youll defend it till it tears you apart and breaks like it did to me
DuskMarine wrote: »its a learn to play issue thats where it ends at. get around the set cause its not that bad at all.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »Sload’s Semblance
overpowered Builds are the problem, not sloads set.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hey folks, just letting you know we have seen this thread and are looking into Sload's performance.
DuskMarine wrote: »i was defending this monstrosity of a set to begin with cause it didnt seem that bad i thought people were overreacting. well i dont think that anymore since i saw a guy in just one rotation that ultimately murdered me proc the dang set 6 times in one rotation how in gods name is this a possible outcome of a set zos???? dont wait to fix this thing fix it now not like you did with viper waiting 6 patches ultimately hurting pvp.........this set is a true mess up.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »
so you are telling me you cannot handle around 5000 damage during a fight in 6 seconds?
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »....but really that is not that bad because if you are fighting 5 people then you should die anyway. because you are outnumbered and THAT is what is wrong with eso, is overpowered builds that can fight 5 or more people and even take out zergs.
overpowered Builds are the problem, not sloads set.
Ragnarock41 wrote: »DuskMarine wrote: »
It would take 36 seconds for this set to proc 6 times in a row. Your entire thread just shows how much you DON'T know about the game, you think you saw sloads 6 times because its a dot that does damage 6 times over 6 seconds.
And saying this set is worse than viper? Now thats rich. You can outheal sloads. Its not even as strong as a regular bleed. When viper was meta , stamblades were murdering people so fast that they were getting killed before even falling down from their horses.
DuskMarine wrote: »ezeepeezee wrote: »If you mean it proc'd and did its ~850 damage 6 times in a single GCD, well, I doubt that, but if that's the case then it's not working as intended.
Probably what you're seeing is Sload's in your recap with an x6 next to it, meaning it proc'd one time and you took all 6 ticks of its damage over time effect.
i saw it pop 6 times on my recap
Ragnarock41 wrote: »DuskMarine wrote: »Ragnarock41 wrote: »DuskMarine wrote: »
It would take 36 seconds for this set to proc 6 times in a row. Your entire thread just shows how much you DON'T know about the game, you think you saw sloads 6 times because its a dot that does damage 6 times over 6 seconds.
And saying this set is worse than viper? Now thats rich. You can outheal sloads. Its not even as strong as a regular bleed. When viper was meta , stamblades were murdering people so fast that they were getting killed before even falling down from their horses.
so a death recap with sloads popping up that many seperate times(not ticks genius) there isnt something wrong with that set?? that makes sense. a set as broken as that pieace of junk youll defend it till it tears you apart and breaks like it did to me
Death recaps only show what did the most damage to you. IF you seriously got killed by a single set(and again, for this set to proc 6 times you need exactly 36 seconds, do you even have any friggen healing abilities on your bar?) this means one and one thing only
You were a shieldstacker that got beaten because you lack the knowledge to put some damn healing in your cookie cutter spoon fed build.
It does 6 ticks over 6 seconds and maybe you also saw Oblivion damage ticks from Oblivion enchants. I don't know if they look different in your recap, because I actually did not die from this so far or I did not pay attention.
DuskMarine wrote: »a set as broken as that pieace of junk youll defend it till it tears you apart and breaks like it did to me
DuskMarine wrote: »