VaranisArano wrote: »The final quest of Reapers March offers a hypothetical look at the future of the Dominion had you the Vestige not intervened.since Ayrenn never really settled matters with her own people and the khajiit were weak without a Mane, the dominion shatters and the Altmer turn against her. She tries to use artifacts to control people, but battlereeve Urcelmo betrays and fatally wounds her.
As for her canon death, I don't think there's any hints in game.
That is correct. There is no mention about the events of ESO in the previous games.I'm pretty sure queen wasn't in lore until ESO.
I believe one of the prevailing theories is that the events in ESO take place during a Dragon Break, so not only is history recorded inconsistently, it’s also incomplete.
In other words, nothing matters! LOL
I believe one of the prevailing theories is that the events in ESO take place during a Dragon Break, so not only is history recorded inconsistently, it’s also incomplete.
In other words, nothing matters! LOL
That theory is mostly coming from people who don't want the stories in this game to be cannon. Its a rather biased theory and considering the psijic questline (not the summerset story) its incorrect regardless.
I believe one of the prevailing theories is that the events in ESO take place during a Dragon Break, so not only is history recorded inconsistently, it’s also incomplete.
In other words, nothing matters! LOL
That theory is mostly coming from people who don't want the stories in this game to be cannon. Its a rather biased theory and considering the psijic questline (not the summerset story) its incorrect regardless.
Dragon Breaks are found throughout ES lore, not just ESO. Nothing to do with people wanting the game to be canon or not. It wasn’t created just for this game. Personally, I like the idea of the Dragon Break, and I DO want it all to be canon.
I believe one of the prevailing theories is that the events in ESO take place during a Dragon Break, so not only is history recorded inconsistently, it’s also incomplete.
In other words, nothing matters! LOL
That theory is mostly coming from people who don't want the stories in this game to be cannon. Its a rather biased theory and considering the psijic questline (not the summerset story) its incorrect regardless.
Dragon Breaks are found throughout ES lore, not just ESO. Nothing to do with people wanting the game to be canon or not. It wasn’t created just for this game. Personally, I like the idea of the Dragon Break, and I DO want it all to be canon.
Kinda hard to have the 3 alliances all controlling cyrodill to be canon, unless zos pulls a fast one and states that imperial legions loyal to the empire (and not to daedra or molag bal) managed to defeat the 3 alliances, the rogue legions and the daedra at the same time.
I believe one of the prevailing theories is that the events in ESO take place during a Dragon Break, so not only is history recorded inconsistently, it’s also incomplete.
In other words, nothing matters! LOL
That theory is mostly coming from people who don't want the stories in this game to be cannon. Its a rather biased theory and considering the psijic questline (not the summerset story) its incorrect regardless.
Dragon Breaks are found throughout ES lore, not just ESO. Nothing to do with people wanting the game to be canon or not. It wasn’t created just for this game. Personally, I like the idea of the Dragon Break, and I DO want it all to be canon.
Kinda hard to have the 3 alliances all controlling cyrodill to be canon, unless zos pulls a fast one and states that imperial legions loyal to the empire (and not to daedra or molag bal) managed to defeat the 3 alliances, the rogue legions and the daedra at the same time.
That’s part of the effect of a Dragon Break. Contradictory events are allowed to happen. From a writer’s perspective, it washes away the problem of inconsistencies from multiple lore authors. But when you take it at face value, it means they can do all sorts of shite and get away with it. :-)
I believe one of the prevailing theories is that the events in ESO take place during a Dragon Break, so not only is history recorded inconsistently, it’s also incomplete.
In other words, nothing matters! LOL
That theory is mostly coming from people who don't want the stories in this game to be cannon. Its a rather biased theory and considering the psijic questline (not the summerset story) its incorrect regardless.
Dragon Breaks are found throughout ES lore, not just ESO. Nothing to do with people wanting the game to be canon or not. It wasn’t created just for this game. Personally, I like the idea of the Dragon Break, and I DO want it all to be canon.
Night_Wolf2112 wrote: »Reading all the recent post about AD and Thalmor and the like.... I may have missed it, QUESTION... is there a lore book out there about the death of our beloved Queen? I would love to read the story!
I believe one of the prevailing theories is that the events in ESO take place during a Dragon Break, so not only is history recorded inconsistently, it’s also incomplete.
In other words, nothing matters! LOL
That theory is mostly coming from people who don't want the stories in this game to be cannon. Its a rather biased theory and considering the psijic questline (not the summerset story) its incorrect regardless.
Dragon Breaks are found throughout ES lore, not just ESO. Nothing to do with people wanting the game to be canon or not. It wasn’t created just for this game. Personally, I like the idea of the Dragon Break, and I DO want it all to be canon.
I wasn't suggesting they weren't and I am fully aware that dragon breaks are apart of the lore, ive played since arena for christ sake but theres no indication that there is currently a dragon break other than the fact the game takes place long before the other elder scroll games and there was virtually no reference too it. Its a little bit of a thin theory.
The reason I referenced the psijic story was purely because of the augur. After all, he would know.
I believe one of the prevailing theories is that the events in ESO take place during a Dragon Break, so not only is history recorded inconsistently, it’s also incomplete.
In other words, nothing matters! LOL
That theory is mostly coming from people who don't want the stories in this game to be cannon. Its a rather biased theory and considering the psijic questline (not the summerset story) its incorrect regardless.
Dragon Breaks are found throughout ES lore, not just ESO. Nothing to do with people wanting the game to be canon or not. It wasn’t created just for this game. Personally, I like the idea of the Dragon Break, and I DO want it all to be canon.
I wasn't suggesting they weren't and I am fully aware that dragon breaks are apart of the lore, ive played since arena for christ sake but theres no indication that there is currently a dragon break other than the fact the game takes place long before the other elder scroll games and there was virtually no reference too it. Its a little bit of a thin theory.
The reason I referenced the psijic story was purely because of the augur. After all, he would know.
Hmm... You just reminded me that someone else made a post detailing a lot of this out, including some of the evidence pointing to a DB. It certainly helps explain why there are thousands of other Vestiges running around on my screen when I know I’m the one who defeated Molag Bal.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/350805/why-is-everyone-so-upset-eso-takes-place-duing-a-a-dragon-break-it-wont-effect-tes6-relax
These are only mentions in the broadest possible strokes, nothing specific enough to be a clear reference to the Three Banners War or the Planemeld. We knew it was a time of strife and short-lived emperors, that's pretty much it.starkerealm wrote: »
That's not entirely true. The Impergum is mentioned in previous lore. Additionally, the first Aldmeri Dominion (the one from ESO) was mentioned as far back as 2005. So it's not completely out of left field. That said, Ayrenn, Jorunn, and Emeric didn't show up before ESO. Also, in spite of being fairly significant, historically, Varen didn't get a nod either.
starkerealm wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
Cite one in game reference pre-2014.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
Cite one in game reference pre-2014.
In game ? Pre-2014 ? Since ESO was released in 2014, that would not be possible.
Kirkbride included her in his works prior to ESO, and Bethesda published lore about her before ESO too.
Ayrenn wasn't created for the sake of ESO, she was incorporated into ESO.
I'll take out of game references too. Just because she might have been mentioned somewhere before ESO's release doesn't mean she wasn't created for ESO - after all, they didn't just put her character in the game on launch day, she was written long before that.anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
Cite one in game reference pre-2014.
In game ? Pre-2014 ? Since ESO was released in 2014, that would not be possible.
Kirkbride included her in his works prior to ESO, and Bethesda published lore about her before ESO too.
Ayrenn wasn't created for the sake of ESO, she was incorporated into ESO.
I'll take out of game references too.
I guess she might have existed as a character concept that was eventually put to use in ESO, but that would be weird, considering that her Dominion didn't become a fleshed out concept until pretty late in the series. I'd love to know what you're referring to, I can't think of any such examples. This reminds me how much it sucks that we can't easily search old Bethesda forums anymore...
I know, but I don't care. With questions like this, out of game sources are just as interesting as the in game ones. Again, even if she wasn't in the games, she might have existed as a concept - and that's what I want to read about.starkerealm wrote: »I'll take out of game references too.
Generally speaking, no. When it comes to TES canon, there's only a few out of game sources that are weighted at face value. Off hand, the Pocket Guide to the Empire (both Editions) are canon, and I think the two novels are as well. Beyond that, if it didn't show up in the games, it operates at a significantly degraded credibility. This is exacerbated by Kirkbride, who has continued writing fanfiction for the setting since he departed BGS in the late 2000s.
I appreciate the lore lesson, but you know, I've read the Pocket Guides too.starkerealm wrote: »I guess she might have existed as a character concept that was eventually put to use in ESO, but that would be weird, considering that her Dominion didn't become a fleshed out concept until pretty late in the series. I'd love to know what you're referring to, I can't think of any such examples. This reminds me how much it sucks that we can't easily search old Bethesda forums anymore...
The Dominion (and Thalmor), have actually been around longer than you might realize. They get discussed in the Pocket Guide as far back as Oblivion (2005.) The big thing to understand is that the Dominion in ESO is not the same Dominion as Skyrim's.
Specifically, ESO takes place during the first Aldmeri Dominion. This organization lasted through most of the second era, though I cant remember exactly when it finally fell apart.
In Skyrim you're dealing with the Second Aldmeri Dominion. They styled themselves after the first Dominion, but there's no real continuity between these two.
The Thalmor are still there. It's the same group. The difference is that after the Oblivion Crisis, they started aggressively seizing power in Alinor. So, by the time you see them in Skyrim, they're the de facto leadership of the Second Dominion. The Thalmor you encounter in ESO are, technically, the same group, but this is nearly 800 years before they'd come to power, so you see them in their original role as administrators.