The Gold Road Chapter – which includes the Scribing system – and Update 42 is now available to test on the PTS! You can read the latest patch notes here: https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/656454/
Maintenance for the week of April 22:
• [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – April 22, 4:00AM EDT (08:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – April 24, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – April 24, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – April 22, 4:00AM EDT (08:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – April 24, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – April 24, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
Do visitor limits in player housing need increasing?
Mureel
✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭
✭✭✭
I think that the visitor number allowed for houses is too small and prevents a lot of fun, player sponsored events!
I bought the CH landmass, and I'd like to have some duelling contests with seating and stuff with a self sponsored 100k prize etc - but 26 people at a time would make most big events rather lacklustre...
Does anyone else think the visitor limits need looking at?
Edited by Mureel on April 12, 2018 9:05AM I bought the CH landmass, and I'd like to have some duelling contests with seating and stuff with a self sponsored 100k prize etc - but 26 people at a time would make most big events rather lacklustre...
Does anyone else think the visitor limits need looking at?
Do visitor limits in player housing need increasing? 71 votes
Yes! More visitors allowed, please.
87%
62 votes
No thank you, they are fine as they are.
12%
9 votes
0
-
Runschei✭✭✭✭✭
✭Yes! More visitors allowed, please.More people? yes pls. More furniture slots? yES PLEASE5 -
Turelus✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Yes! More visitors allowed, please.I'm all for increasing all the caps on housing.
I think now that more guilds are getting guild halls it's needed to let more people in.@Turelus - EU PC Megaserver
"Don't count on others for help. In the end each of us is in this alone. The survivors are those who know how to look out for themselves."1 -
Mureel✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭Yes! More visitors allowed, please.The yes votes reasoning are a given, I think - but if anyone voting no, cares to comment as to their reasoning, I'd really like to read that. I cannot think of a logical reason not to want an increase - if you are at all into housing and if you aren't, I cannot see a logical reason why you'd vote in a poll that hasn't anything to do with you.
I am sure people have some good reasons for this I haven't thought of, so if you do, please share?0 -
MrWesleyPipes✭✭✭Yes! More visitors allowed, please.yes but not nearly as much as the furnishing slots need to be raised. priorities please since this has been an issue since the release of homestead.2 -
Chickenstein✭✭✭✭No thank you, they are fine as they are.The yes votes reasoning are a given, I think - but if anyone voting no, cares to comment as to their reasoning, I'd really like to read that.
There is no real reason. I just think of all things that could and should be tweaked, like furniture caps etc., this would just be the last on my list (though I understand the reasons for wanting that). So if I had to choose, this would not be it.Orc Harvester: It's about picking flowers and smashing things0 -
Mureel✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭Yes! More visitors allowed, please.Chickenstein wrote: »The yes votes reasoning are a given, I think - but if anyone voting no, cares to comment as to their reasoning, I'd really like to read that.
There is no real reason. I just think of all things that could and should be tweaked, like furniture caps etc., this would just be the last on my list (though I understand the reasons for wanting that). So if I had to choose, this would not be it.
You poll muddier! xD
Joking aside I do agree with you!
FYI, This poll doesn't exclude anything else, nor is it meant to.
I'm asking if it should be considered- but not in any mutually exclusive way.
Item and storage limits go before this for me too. ❤️Edited by Mureel on April 12, 2018 9:43AM0 -
Guarlet✭✭✭✭✭Yes! More visitors allowed, please.It would be nice for guilds that have 'guild halls' to allow more people to congregate.Edited by Guarlet on April 12, 2018 9:36AMAKA The Goblinator, PC/EU0 -
Chickenstein✭✭✭✭No thank you, they are fine as they are.Chickenstein wrote: »The yes votes reasoning are a given, I think - but if anyone voting no, cares to comment as to their reasoning, I'd really like to read that.
There is no real reason. I just think of all things that could and should be tweaked, like furniture caps etc., this would just be the last on my list (though I understand the reasons for wanting that). So if I had to choose, this would not be it.
You poll muddier! xD
This poll doesn't exclude anything else.
I'm asking if it should be considered- but not in any mutually exclusive way.
Item and storage limits go before this for me too. ❤️
Heh
well then better not call the option "they are fine as they are" which manipulated me to click right away Orc Harvester: It's about picking flowers and smashing things0 -
Mureel✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭Yes! More visitors allowed, please.
Yes I agree! People have offered many theories as to why item limit increases aren't happening. I'm not sure I believe them, but lots of possible reasons have been posited.MrWesleyPipes wrote: »yes but not nearly as much as the furnishing slots need to be raised. priorities please since this has been an issue since the release of homestead.
It's a shame some things like rocks/trees/flowers cannot be a 'stamp' type thing so that you only need one, but can place it multiple times in the same house. A second one for a second house etc- but I understand why they don't do that - monetisation reasons mainly.
If they could though, that would sort out a lot of space and loading issues.
0 -
Scorpiodisc✭✭✭I think that the visitor number allowed for houses is too small and prevents a lot of fun, player sponsored events!
I bought the CH landmass, and I'd like to have some duelling contests with seating and stuff with a self sponsored 100k prize etc - but 26 people at a time would make most big events rather lacklustre...
Does anyone else think the visitor limits need looking at?
I would much rather be able to place my alts in the house when I am not playing them.2 -
chess1ukb16_ESO✭✭✭✭No thank you, they are fine as they are.more items 1000% more important than increasing player capIreniicus
GM - Tamriel Traders Guild (TTG); Divine Deals; Allmart & The Alchemist Emporium0 -
DieAlteHexe✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Yes! More visitors allowed, please.Scorpiodisc wrote: »I think that the visitor number allowed for houses is too small and prevents a lot of fun, player sponsored events!
I bought the CH landmass, and I'd like to have some duelling contests with seating and stuff with a self sponsored 100k prize etc - but 26 people at a time would make most big events rather lacklustre...
Does anyone else think the visitor limits need looking at?
I would much rather be able to place my alts in the house when I am not playing them.
Yes! YES!
Dirty, filthy casual aka Nancy, the Wallet Warrior Carebear Potato Whale Snowflake0 -
Mureel✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭Yes! More visitors allowed, please.chess1ukb16_ESO wrote: »more items 1000% more important than increasing player cap
The 2 things aren't mutually exclusive.
Edited to add: also it seems a lot more viable than adding more item slots, if what others have said about it is even true.Edited by Mureel on April 12, 2018 11:26AM0 -
Andarne✭✭✭Yes! More visitors allowed, please.Everything about Housing needs increased. It's far, far too restrictive.
Heck - if anybody ever played Star Wars Galaxies (RIP) you could place thousands of items in a non-instanced location.
ESO easily has ten years on SWG, I think they need to get their fingers out and throw some love towards Homesteads.2 -
Scorpiodisc✭✭✭Everything about Housing needs increased. It's far, far too restrictive.
Heck - if anybody ever played Star Wars Galaxies (RIP) you could place thousands of items in a non-instanced location.
ESO easily has ten years on SWG, I think they need to get their fingers out and throw some love towards Homesteads.
Forget about just houses. In Star Wars Galaxies my guild had their own city on Dantooine0 -
redspecter23✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Yes! More visitors allowed, please.Obviously there should be as high a cap as ZOS can possibly add. Their excuse of that leading to performance issues is a bit of BS. Performance issues don't seem to stop them from developing anything else in the game. *COUGH* Cyrodiil *COUGH* If adding one more visitor to houses will lead to constant game crashes and server shutdowns, I'll eat my shoe.1 -
ghastley✭✭✭✭✭
✭No thank you, they are fine as they are.I voted no mainly because I don't want a simple increase across the board. Yes, there are instances that could use a higher count as a trade-off against something else, and I'd prefer a system that lets you make those trades. E.g. You want to make an open arena - trade visitor slots against furnishing.
0
